rjshae

About right too...

One example only serves to show how not to do it. There are cRPG games that implemented multi-player just fine without impacting the single-player experience.

Unfortunately, many of the humorous images out there contain grammatical errors.

People liked Aerie? Yes, there are players that liked Aerie, particularly since she can be romanced. Tastes vary.

I suspect there's probably not a few players looking for an Aerie-like experience in PoE2. Ydwin doesn't quite fit the bill, but she's probably closer than the other recruits.

The problem is this isn't a useful poll for marketing research purposes. People who prefer co-op wouldn't be here taking part in the poll. If they were, the results could be quite different.

I had a thought. For the sake of drama, one of the existing full companions could get a glorious death at a key moment in the campaign. One of the sidekicks could then be elevated to a full companion in the expansion as a fill-in.

This isn't particle physics, so I don't see a need for the designers to skew to some symmetrical class relationship. I'd rather see them improve and enhance the current classes.

Meh, isn't it better if they're working on the actual game rather than wasting time on making detailed updates?

The running Otyugh animation:

NWN2 Plug #14:

"The Apprehension Engine" Our office needs one of these...

I see Trump's "thin-skin brigade" has been busy. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39828336

She's probably old enough to be your grandmother, keeps her three re-animated husbands in her cellar, and collects coprolites for a crap museum.

Numbers are harder to get confused over than abstract icons though. Not to mention that there isn't all that much space in those thumbnails. Not as long as the number of icons remain low and their footprint is small. Humans can easily recognize 3-4 objects at a glance. True, however since some abilities are one point per use, you would have some thumbnails with 10 icons over them. Huh? One point per use = @

Numbers are harder to get confused over than abstract icons though. Not to mention that there isn't all that much space in those thumbnails. Not as long as the number of icons remain low and their footprint is small. Humans can easily recognize 3-4 objects at a glance.

If it were me I'd get rid of the negative numbers and replace them with a matching number of icons. For example, -4 becomes @@@@. That will make it look less like a math problem.

If they delivered it now it would be a misguidebook.

There's a natural selection process at work. Athletic people tend to be more physically attractive due to symmetry. Adventurers tend to not be old due to attrition. http://www.today.com/health/why-good-athletes-are-good-looking-too-2D12054705