Pidesco

Isn't Tigs' graphics card a discrete GPU?

If you can, upgrade your GPU. It should make some difference in performance with games in general.

The distance travelled by light in a vacuum in 1/c seconds. My shoe size is a 43(10

Specs?

A scientist not using metric is, quite frankly, incredible. The problem wasn't one using imperial and the other one using metric, the problem was a scientist using imperial at all.

The combat, at least, is much improved over the first game, right? Because the original combat was terrible. When you have played more say something about mixing and matching of stances.

Tell us about that. Now.

I love custom character creation, but it is not a must have, these days, nor is it devolving from current RPGs. It really depends on what the game is specifically designed for.

Regarding those inventory screens, the items seem sorted to me. All the swords are together, all the guns are together, and I'm guessing the clothes that are separated, are separated by character. So the clothes next to the guns, for example, may be Katarina's clothes

Except, reality isn't deterministic. Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of quantum physics knows this. Regardless of the universe's actual inner workings, a person (in this case, the Tibetan monk) can have whatever beliefs he wants. I'm positing that the monk believes in a deterministic universe. In any case, it's perfectly possible to argue that there's a deterministic framework hidden behind quantum mechanics. It's pure speculation, of course, and it's not my own opinion, but it's a valid way of seeing things. No, it's not. The universe is quite clearly probabilistic. ok.

My Collector's Edition has been dispatched!

Except, reality isn't deterministic. Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of quantum physics knows this. Regardless of the universe's actual inner workings, a person (in this case, the Tibetan monk) can have whatever beliefs he wants. I'm positing that the monk believes in a deterministic universe. In any case, it's perfectly possible to argue that there's a deterministic framework hidden behind quantum mechanics. It's pure speculation, of course, and it's not my own opinion, but it's a valid way of seeing things.

Way off-topic posts do not increase you post count.

I want to see that experiment. I don't think that's possible. Also I don't understand the first sentence of the article, there's no either/or between time being a dimension and being "the numerical order of material change".

There is no way for one person to determine whether his own self-awareness is true or false. So there is no other choice but to accept your self-awareness as true.

Philosophically speaking, I'd interpret the monk's statement as a way of tackling free will within a deterministic worldview. My "translation": Reality is deterministic, but the illusion of human free will is a necessary one in order to function as a self aware entity.

I'd need to read the original article but, it seems to me they are arguing over semantics. That time is the order of events seems to me tautological and, in any case, doesn't go against the notion of time as a 4th dimension.

Indeed it does.

Um, in what way was his statement silly? His statement: "Also, Einstein thought gravity was a constant, which is complete hogwash. Mass is just a variable as everything else." First, his statement implies that the modern possibility of gravity not being constant is due to the variability of mass. This is not true and does not make sense. Secondly, even considering the hypothesis of the gravitational constant depending on the particles involved, it's still a theory that hasn't been experimentally verified and so, as such, does not turn the notion of the gravitational constant being, well, constant, into "complete hogwash."

Hold the facepalm, bro. There are plenty of people way more educated than me who are thinking along the same lines, for instance I'm sorry but your original statement is still very silly.

"but he also plays hopscotch."

Science isn't faith based.

I'm not really into the whole revenge aspect of this. I am relieved. I wish there was a better way to deal with a truly disturbed and violent individual like this, but I think most of those ways are unrealistic. For example, the best way for this situation to be resolved is for the millions of Muslims in this world to stand up against people like Osama Bin Laden who pervert the message of Islam. But unfortunately there is still too much divisiveness even among the moderates in the Muslim community. Bin Laden, while at least partially responsible for many acts of terrorism was not a lone serial killer. He was part of a large, organized group of violent people with huge chips on their shoulders regarding western civilization. Eliminating Bin Laden achieved nothing in terms of curbing future terrorist attacks. The Muslim Brotherhood is a huge organization with millions poured into their coffers regularly that isn't going to be stopped by killing any specific individual. Your average Muslims are being routinely stepped on by the US backed and completely corrupt Saudi royal family while, concurrently, fundamentalist Muslim schools (AKA terrorist schooling and recruitment centers) are being bankrolled by the same royals in order to keep the Wahhabis from rebelling. Not exactly a recipe to stop terrorism. All killing Bin Laden did was give a boost to the current US administration popularity at home, and make most Americans a bit happier.

I didn't, Nepenthe did and Raithe screwed up the quote. Edit: Fixed it.

Just to really throw some fuel on the bonfire then.. I could say that one of the few good things to come out of 9/11 was that a whole heap of Americans suddenly stopped giving money to the IRA. They kept giving money to the Wahhabis and the Muslim Brotherhood, though.