obyknven

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZ7iUHfX7LA&hd=1 O RLY?

I've been trying to explain that to him for like the last year. His trolling could be way more effective with focus. That's why I always scoff when people compare him to Lord of Flies, he's nowhere near as organized or coherent. But I am not troll. Why you all so ... brainwashed? Taliban homeland occupied by enemy - check They fight with occupants for homeland sovereignty - check This girl shot by Taliban because she spread propaganda against them (i.e. against freedom fighters) - check http://www.thenews.c...lah-led-Taliban What wrong? P.S. I don't like Taliban, but don't understand why Westlings make histeria abou this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_egivBTPHhE&hd=1 Haters gonna hate

Is . . . that video supposed to be your idea of what looks good? Because it looks absolutely vile, to a truly ungodly extent . . . all of the characters, but especially the female characters, it's just revolting. Why . . . would you ever want that? In anything? Ever? It's example of good detailed and animated 3d models. P.S. Female characters of nonhuman race, your concept beauty not work here.

bump

But Taliban is Freedom Fighters... And this girl spread propaganda against them in own blog. Who really hates Freedom?

It is difficult question. Afghanistan occupied by enemy and this girl is simple collaborator. The usual punishment for collaboration with the enemy in time of war is death. Europeans were doing the same thing in the WW2. In present time "democratic" U.S.: http://www.smh.com.a...0927-26m7s.html

Obsidianz please don't make low-quality 3d models again. They looks too terrible. Just comparise your work with others games. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_yyg0WCnTw&hd=1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8IknyQhliA&hd=1

Lololol In these videos explained why all who draws wings on his back hussars - stupid ones. http://youtu.be/aZoN_tb950o http://youtu.be/IDa_1eTptoU The Devil is in the details.

I don't talk about this. I say they can't make this properly, because European culture alien to them. For example this is chinese warriors by Angus Mcbridge They look simplified and clownish with comparison to illustration of Liu Yong Hua so I would prefer the original U.S. design than inept imitation of someone.

Did we say it shouldn't? We are talking about inspiration, not duplication. U.S. developers can't do Medieval/Renaissance historical inspired armors, they have different cultural background. Obsidianz is not CD Projekt RED. Do not want.

U made Mongols lol. Chinese and Japan armorers lol too. Even Indian armorers lol.

U made Mongols lol. Chinese and Japan armorers lol too.

In present time PE too similar for this I'm so sad.

Oh, you have lack of information. Imagine society consist from two parts. One part is vampires. They must kill human and suck they blood, because they can't exist without this. They are exploitators. Other part is humans. They are just food and prey for vampires. Thousands of they must paying their lives for the prosperity of the Vampires. They are exploited classes. Part of humans bribed by vampires. Vampires use them as human hunters, protectors and just for pleasure. They servants of the exploiters, the parasitic part of society. Part of humans like sheep being led to the slaughterhouse. They are passive majority of the exploited classes. Part of humans fights against vampires and their servants. These Vampire Hunters are communists. can not be a peaceful resolution of this. Vampire hunters will destroy all vampires and save humanity, or vampires exterminate all mankind. Do you understand my allegory? Recommend a read "State and Revolution" by Lenin http://www.marxists....terev/index.htm especially this http://www.marxists....rev/ch05.htm#s2 "From Protest to Resistance" by Ulrike Meinhof http://germanhistory...document_id=895 "Guerrilla war, a method" by Ernesto Che Guevara http://www.marxists....-war-method.htm "World Revolution 2: the Return to a Global Revolutionary Strategy Based on the Experience of the 20th Century" by Alexander Tarasov http://scepsis.ru/en...icles/id_10.php

Looks like U.S. Government want this death. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57528335/security-dwindled-before-deadly-libyan-consulate-attack/

The only people I ever hear this coming from are right-wingers and Cuban exiles. I've yet to see a shred of concrete proof. According all neutral sources, Che has not done anything to actively against homosexuals. I recommend getting a copy of "rainbow solidarity in defense of cuba" by Leslie Feinberg, it goes into details about the progression of Gay rights in Cuba. http://www.transgend...r.org/cuba.html From amazon review:

In Memoriam Comandante Che Guevara Lynch Born June 14th 1928 Murdered 8th October 1967 45 Years Remembered http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOfo6VMFIHM&hd=1

NATO have even more enemies. War against NATO is inevitable, it is a matter of our survival, peace can't be between us. Why not start this war now? Heh, thought we were having a real conversation for a second, my bad Beware of Denyen bearing gifts. We have no illusions about NATO nature. After USSR collapse NATO captures one country after another. Every Second we procrastinate our enemy gets that much stronger ...

NATO have even more enemies. War against NATO is inevitable, it is a matter of our survival, peace can't be between us. Why not start this war now?

I would assume Turkey would get pretty substantial help from countries like the US. Who would back Syria? Iran, Lebanon (Hezbollah) and Eurasian Union. In perspective Kurdish rebellion in Turkey and Shia rebellion in Iraq, Taliban rebellion in Afghanistan.

... I wouldn't consider the dissolution of culture/nationalism as something that would make people all communists or anything like that, working towards the collective. Substitution of concepts. Multiculturalism is not Marxism thing. This is North-American consumption postmodern culture. Because consumers can't produce anything, they steal elements of other cultures and mix these parts. Internationalism totally different. It's just alliance exploited class of all nations in class war against parasitic classes. Following on from Marx, Lenin took up the national question as a means of arming the revolutionary social democracy in Russia and uniting the oppressed nationalities under the banner of the working class. In answer to national oppression, the Russian Marxists (in the famous Clause 9 of the Russian Social Democratic Party) called for the right of nations to self-determination - that is, to complete separation as states. "To accuse those who support freedom of self-determination, i.e., freedom to secede, of encouraging separation, is foolish and hypocritical as accusing those who advocate freedom of divorce of encouraging the destruction of family ties", stated Lenin. (The Right of Nations to Self-Determination, p.83) "The bourgeoisie always places its national demands in the forefront, and does so in categorical fashion. With the proletariat, however, these demands are subordinated to the interests of the class struggle." (Ibid, p.21) And again, "While recognising equality and equal rights to a national state, it values above all and places foremost the alliance of the proletarians of all nations, and assesses any national demand, any national separation, from the angle of the workers' class struggle." "The cornerstone of the whole policy of the Communist International on the national and colonial questions", stated Lenin, "must be closer union of the proletarians and working masses generally of all nations and countries for a joint revolutionary struggle to overthrow the landlords and the bourgeoisie; for this alone will guarantee victory over capitalism, without which the abolition of national oppression and inequality is impossible." (Preliminary Draft of Theses on the National and Colonial Questions, 5th June 1920) More in "Nationalism in Lenin" by Leon Trotsky. http://www.marxists....25/lenin/10.htm

just for comparison. http://www.themoscow...cle/468391.html That's a great story! It's refreshing to see you post a scenario where multiculturalism existed and flourished. This is not multiculturalism. It's indifference. We just trade with them without influence to each other. For example Russians conquer Tartars 460 years ago. Russian and Tartars cultures not influence each to other, it' two parallel worlds without intersections. We have relations, but they have economical, political or military nature. Multiculturalism totally different from this. Multiculturalism it's just soft assimilation by North-American Neo-liberal culture with destruction any other cultures.

They look at my breast