Orogun01

Now I really gotta ask what they were doing all these months, if you can't even change Thorton's face.

Speak for everyone else that isn't me.

So? Shepard has a canon face but there is still the option to create your own. I'm not asking for much, just some textures that don't make beards look so fake.

No PC version?!

I'm okay with the face model, but the baby doll skin is a bother. Is it really to hard to add some pores there?

We haven't had hurricanes for 3 years almost and may I add that winter down here is just 2 months before we go back to scorching heat and prayers for rain.

That seems a little to advanced, specially since this game is not made for modding in the first place. Something like that would take a lot of programming skill and time, that would narrow it down to a few willing individuals. Most likely a scar mod customization ME style.

I don't know for sure but I think that there isn't a control group.

Or a scar? Well, I'm sure that someone will come up with something, even ME had mods.

Jamie Foxx (born Eric Marlon Bishop) took his stage surname as tribute to comedian Redd Foxx (born John Elroy Sanford) who in turn took his stage surname from Jimmie "The Beast" Foxx, Philidelphia Athletics/Red Sox 1st Baseman from 1936-1942 I'm so into you

If I can't get a better looking complexion for his skin, I'll just mod it in or something. I really can't stand Mike's plastic face. Please share.

maybe i was doing it wrong but i spent probably 60 hours on that game and was still getting owned by regular enemies in the later parts. hitting end bosses for 3 damage.... not my idea of easy. I'm no rpg pro, but games like ff6 are easy as pie and vagrant story was hard as hell Then you should try the Last Remnant, the only game where you could have 999999 HP and die. True story.

Wait, you are going to put him in front of a motel? And miss the chance to put the box in front of David Blaine's hows with a big sign that reads: This is how is done, you phony! Personally I don't think that he is violating the laws of biology and physic, merely circumventing them by taking his energy input from another source. My biggest concern is that there is only one test subject to get any definite (applicable) results. Plus, even with conclusive evidence there is bound to be a lot of skepticism among the scientific community. Not that it would be a bad thing since there could be bias on part of the Indian scientist that are conducting the test.

So all this extra time and the same face Maybe, because is a beta this features weren't in it. But dammit I don't want a boy toy spy!

Just beat Legendary Dark Knight mode yesterday

Walsh, I don't disagree with your comment but I see it from a more humanist perspective. There are scientists who through nurture or choice have a passion for a certain area of science and a unique perspective. That's their drive and motive for research, not the utilitarian sense. E.G. Einstein whilst as a kid dreamed to ride in the back of a beam of light, a dream that through his life lead him to the theory of relativity. Or like Newton, sometimes discovery is just the right person at the right place and time. However this testing is not so unfounded as it seems, there have been other instances of testing "superhumans";if you will, that have given interesting results. Wim Hof was tested by submerging his body in a tub of ice with temp. bellow 20, all the while his core temperature actually saw a rise. The final conclusion was that through meditation and control of his physiology he had an uncanny resistance to cold. Could be a similar case here, a man that has trained his body to survive from minimal amounts of energy.

Kasabian- West Ryder Pauper Lunatic Asylum How this gem of an album hid from my radar for so long baffles me.

Because if you're a real scientist, you can't write in your report "LIAR LIAR" and call it a day? Something as obviously false as this isn't worth the trouble of testing. If I said I could fly and **** gold, is it worth a scientific study to prove I can't? If scientist thought like that I would say that they are biased towards the subject and therefore should not study it. You can't determine beyond a shadow of a doubt that something is false just because you think it's a lie. Because you know what: the world isn't flat and the center of the universe.

Well, I've done almost everything, but I have no idea how I managed to get 76 hours, too (I've completed the first ME in less than 40 hours). Personally, I think that an rpg MUST be long. It's not only because rpgs are "epic" (I suggest to play Steambot Chronicles, a wonderful PS2 game that isn't absolutely epic but lasted MONTHS on my console!), but also because they're the only genre that can give this kind of experience. To be clear, games nowadays are becoming shorter and shorter, so if I want to seriously immerse myself in some gaming world I only have RPGs. Steambot Chronicles, isn't that a JRPG with mini-games and a dating sim?

Now that's BS. You can definitely survive longer than that without either food or water. Do you have any sources for your claim? It would take an individual in extremely bad physical shape/ in extreme conditions to die in a day without water. Minimum you can go 2 days without water, beyond that physique, willpower and environment are factor in determining how long before death.

There are free online shooters, not with the same level of quality but if you can look past that.

That's because most people don't know what an ACS module is.

Saw Robin Hood today, prime Riddley Scott work. The production values, the photography and direction his mark all over it and the story adds a new perspective to the myth. Not one I regret.

The Witcher originally also had a strict requirements check that wouldn't allow the game to play and the TAGES protections which I'm very critical of. Specially since it made the game crash every hour.

Is plastic, so you need to buy the lube. That's how they get ya