I want teh kotor 3

....and another that i will not bother with, thanks to mr. Yahtzee. If you use ZP as your main source of reviews, it doesn't seem like you'll buy very many games... I think he's only liked 3 games that he's reviewed (Bioshock, Portal, and... something else)...

That is the most idiotic thing I have read in ages. How, exactly, do business help you by making money? Stock. EDIT: Made it less douche-y.

*notes sig*

:lol: :lol:

Those are fairly gigantic things. Roads alone require a huge amount of work and maintenance. Very true. That's why I readily admit that some government and taxes are necessary, just not to the god-awful extent we have them now.

It's still a start... Just imagine the possibilities.... Portal on my laptop... Its gonna be great...

Not villainizing anyone. But corporations are capable of more harm on their own than greedy individuals simply because they are well organized groups of people working in concert towards their goals. L'union fait la force and all... and often that union is used to shift responsibility from the individual. It goes without saying that they are also capable of more good, too. By your logic, then, governments can do far more harm than can corporations, and it just boils down to whose interests you prefer: those of business or those of government. I, for one, prefer business. Why would you rather trust a business, whose main interest is to make money, than a government, whose main interest is to serve the people it governs? When businesses make money, they help me. Government doesn't, for the most part. And by "for the most part" I mean everything other than roads, cops, and the military.

Oh my God that is so wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong! This.

Its gonna be great...

Not villainizing anyone. But corporations are capable of more harm on their own than greedy individuals simply because they are well organized groups of people working in concert towards their goals. L'union fait la force and all... and often that union is used to shift responsibility from the individual. It goes without saying that they are also capable of more good, too. By your logic, then, governments can do far more harm than can corporations, and it just boils down to whose interests you prefer: those of business or those of government. I, for one, prefer business.

Corporations are after the same thing everybody else is: money. So why villainize them as opposed to everybody else's?

The difference between the level of education at, for example, Princeton and a smaller school like Rowan isn't much. The education is what you make of it, if you put in the effort to excel in your field, then you will. Plenty of graduates from community colleges are making more than the Big Name School graduate. But if paying 200k for 4 years for the name of a school is up your alley, I'd say go for it. But at least do yourself a favor and pick a nicer school than Princeton. Great education or not, you won't be having much fun there. While the level of education is obviously related to what you put in, a great university helps too. Besides, a diploma that says "Princeton" opens doors... And I think I'll have plenty of fun at Princeton, seeing as though it has one of the best physics programs in the country, and a pretty damn good mathletics team.

To each his own, I guess. I'll be up there at Rutgers with two very good friends, though we opted not to dorm together freshman year because we'd probably end up hating each other. We also wanna branch out out and meet some new people as well. Princeton is my second choice, and my best friend's first, so there's a chance we may end up doing something similar to that... unless you're getting a scholarship I'd pass on Princeton. 40k for a school is just ridiculous. Save yourself the money. I don't care about the money so much as about getting the best education possible.

To each his own, I guess. I'll be up there at Rutgers with two very good friends, though we opted not to dorm together freshman year because we'd probably end up hating each other. We also wanna branch out out and meet some new people as well. Princeton is my second choice, and my best friend's first, so there's a chance we may end up doing something similar to that...

Double major in pharmaceuticals and business? good luck balancing that workload while trying to maintain any form of a social life. Meh. Social lives are overrated, but, then again, I want to go to MIT, so I don't really expect to have one... Wait... Double majoring at MIT (what I plan to do if I get in)... That sounds suicidal... Uh, social lives aren't overrated. I'd take an average paying job and a great group of friends over a 10mil a year job and no one to spend it with any day. I'm... Definitely not a people person. So yeah, I would rather have a nice job at CERN than a bunch of friends... One or two people is more than enough...

Double major in pharmaceuticals and business? good luck balancing that workload while trying to maintain any form of a social life. Meh. Social lives are overrated, but, then again, I want to go to MIT, so I don't really expect to have one... Wait... Double majoring at MIT (what I plan to do if I get in)... That sounds suicidal...

So double major if you can't decide.

You know what I'm about to post... K3K3K3K3K3K3K3K3K3K3

I didn't like Bioshock 1, so I avoided the sequel altogether. Anyway, I decided to re-play Halo 2's campaign.

I was going to post "not remotely sad" until I saw the joke, at which point I lol'd.

This. Just in case you haven't figured that out yet.

Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. I suggest you read a bit more on the subject of WWII before making your ignorance public so casually. The theoretical foundations of the science behind nuclear weapons were laid out in the early 1930s, more than a decade after the end of WWI. IT WAS A TYPO. I know full well that the Manhattan Project was completed dueing WWI, not WWII. I'm not stupid. No point, huh? Taking out the Nazi leadership (or a great deal of it) quickly and decisively would have been useless? Nukes destroy cities. When the military command is in said city, there is no more military command. War becomes far easier. Civilians die, but better their civilians than our soldiers. I fail to see how WMDs come into the equation, there. The IDF has a history of success against overwhelming odds. When did nuclear weapons become the sole option for preemptive/defensive strikes? And, more pertinently, why on Earth should Israel attack Iran?! Iran is trying to obtain nukes. Their leader has previously expressed a desire to destroy Israel. When Iran gets nukes, chances are they'll grow a set and attack Israel. To prevent this, Israel needs to attack first. Nukes are necessary because Iran has 'em, or will have them.

The Hurt Locker did and IMO it was a better movie. Not to say that Inglorious Basterds wasn't great, but from a technical standpoint the Hurt Locker awards were well deserved. Christoph Waltz was excellent on that movie though, he stole the spotlight from everyone else. I never saw Hurt Locker, perhaps I should...

I think Wilson may have been planted by the collectors.