I want teh kotor 3

I think Inglorious Bastards should have won everything it was nominated for (and even stuff it wasn't) and that Brad Pitt deserves an Oscar for his role.

Who, me? Why was it interesting? I'm not backing down from my opinion, just deciding to use my energy elsewhere, and by that I mean stop procrastinating.

Certainly, he was better than Obama is. Either of them are better than someone who has advocated nuking two different peoples in the past week or so for the crime of being Iranian or German. If your ultimate "point" is that Mahmoud cannot be trusted with nukes but "we" can then you haven't so much shot yourself in the foot as self amputated both legs. I said we should have nuked Germany during WWI, when we were at war with them, as I thought it would have been a better tactical decision than Hiroshima. I advocate nuking Iran because it has shown the intent to destroy Israel, an ally of the US in an area where it has no others. My point is not that Ahmadinejad has more or less of a right to have nukes than any other leader; my point is that Israel should attack first.

I'm procrastinating.

It looks more like two sumo wrestlers with wizard hats on.

I'm playing the award-winning game of "procrastination." The AI keeps on screwing me over.

Ya know, that's a valid point. This arguing is never going to go anywhere. LoF sure as all hell isn't ever going to be able to convince me that I should trade in my (admittedly rather unique) worldview for Commiedom, and vice versa. Why waste my time?

I believe its Tali.

China and Venezuela are closely economically tied to the United States and would be unlikely to pursue war with us. Iran is only a regional power, and no threat to the US proper. Russia is more busy worrying about things like 15% unemployment than to try to invade the United States. With what navy would they do so? Would they nuke us? (No) The Taliban, ooh, real scary, a bunch of bum**** goatfarmers on the other side of the planet, real threat. And terrorists can't be beaten by tanks and bomber jets, you lunatic, nor can they pose any realistic threat to the United States. China is a real enemy precisely because we have such strong economic ties. They own a great deal of America's treasury, and so any aggression by them towards us could conceivably lead to violence.

Sorry, but what he described was as much Libertarianism as it was Anarchism seeing as Libertarianism advocates both the maximization of individual liberty and rights and the minimization, or in some cases abolition, of government. In the more extreme forms those titles are interchangeable. I was referring to more moderate Libertarianism. Sorry, I should have made that clear. EDIT: @ DN (below me): They'd probably both work well, but I think we need some government, just a very minimal amount.

Yup. There are too many states, and too much discrepancy between laws. Personally, I think the entire country could be best served with 4 criminal laws and no more, but nobody would ever agree to that other than me.

What Kill said. And LoF, military, by basic human nature, will never be unnecessary. Out of curiosity, you do realize that, without a military, none of your beloved Commie governments could have taken power, right?

BWAAAHAAAAHAAAAAAAA! That's a yes.

It's just for a soundtrack on a planet, event, character, etc., not for background music for gameplay. Uhh... So, your list is more "inspired by" the games than "for" them?

No, it's not. Yes, it is. The OP suggests the removal of nearly all government functions. That is, for all intents and purposes, anarchism.

I'm a Libertarian. What was originally suggested isn't libertarianism, its anarchism. They're not the same. Most libertarians agree that most of government needs to go, but that some is necessary. EDIT: From the OP, the steps suggested in 1 2 and 3 are bad. 4 5 and 6 (just calling it that) should be enacted.

Certainly, he was better than Obama is.

This. I'm not a big fan of socialism, to say the least, but even I admit that some socialistic elements (public education, roads, military, and police) must exist.

Explain.. How can someone who has won in free votes, be a totalitarian scum??? He didn't win a free election. Oh yeah, so because FOX and CNN said it without any evidence presented, it must be true... yeah... i bet the evidence is on the shelf next to the evidence of Iraqi's weapons of mass destruction, and next to the evidence that if there was no piracy, every download would be turned into a sale... How about The New Yorker? Or the New York Times? Or Newsweek? Want more evidence?

I think Iran needs to go because its government is comprised of totalitarian scum. Also, it'll eventually come to a war between Israel and Iran, and I'd much rather have Israel.

I just made my ringtone. I'm awesome.

This. But I'll be cheering too.

Of course, because that's what I expect ALL students who use facebook to be talking about Edit: I'm sick and I've been told I'm talking like Marcus Fenix.

I'm supposed to be writing an essay. Instead, I got into a giant argument on facebook about-- of course-- whether or not pure laissez-faire capitalism is good...

Neither Stalin nor Mao came anywhere near creating a paradise. Sorry.