Tale

You claim to want suggestions and tips on how to build a basilisk war droid and a lightsaber. There's not a corner of the internet where you could ever be considered serious, regardless of how immature you try to act.

lol no im darth revan jk heres one dk if its the one mando has emperor_palpatine69.tripod.com/Droids/Pics/Ba... Impressive.

You forgot to end your message with "LOL" You are a disgrace to the art.

Still a fake poster.

Fake poster.

I think you may be interpreting "give a chance to go to bed" a bit too liberally. I don't play games of chance.

I wouldn't. She's got to have a sense of humor. I'm tired of them pressing charges.

Redheads don't actually exist. I've never seen one. Have yu considered a tertium quid? They could all be Canadian. Actually, I would consider the third option to be that I have no schema for redheads and thus only remember them as brunettes.

Redheads don't actually exist. I've never seen one.

Did she do that because of the treatment for her illness? Ive seen people do that before for that reason. Not the eyebrows mind you but eh, she was showing you a thing or two. She had wanted to shave her head for a while, and finally decided to do it. Its really putting a lot of strain on a relationship that was already strained. Every time we talk she brings up her hair, which eventually leads to me mentioning how much I hate it, which pisses her off and I get in trouble. L2carelessabouthair

Isn't that what Sawyer is putting together as a NWN2 module?

No, it doesn't. Hiro says differently in the comic, but that's because Hiro doesn't know the truth.

It was never Sylar, always Peter. That entire episode seemingly set the future timeline to come about. Sylar never had Claire's powers, so that's not why he survived being attacked by Hiro. And Sylar wasn't the one to blow up.

Because only Peter and Sylar know the truth.

I prefered Eccleston, but Tennant is doing a really good job.

I remember one guy I met, named Rob the Robot. Me and a friend were going to scam him with an item trade. Well, so we did, only he also tried scamming us. The funniest part about it, is we end up trading 1 credit for a monomate or whatever, then Rob goes running off, giggling like he just made off with the contents of Fort Knox.

I see your rubbish and raise you rubbish again. FPS games are about action. Something just as accomplish able with old assets as story. The proof that flashy graphics aren't as needed is still readily evidenced by the fact that the most popular online FPS is an 8 year old game.

I was such a griefer in Phantasy Star Online. If anyone in here played that game, chances are I've robbed at least one of you. Also, I raised TWO Seamen to freedom in one game.

That's a terrible argument for, well, anything. "You don't like our faulty product that causes injury, it's not hard to simply not buy it." It's not a terrible argument. Your example is outlandish and not remotely applicable. It's more like "well, you don't like our product, you can simply not purchase it." Trying to relate it to injury is silly. Once again, this is ignoring the benefits of episodic gaming. One being that episodes are indeed released quicker. Before any argument can be made about episode 2 taking a while, it should be openly acknowledged that episode 1 was released. If they used a different model, episode 1 not only would not have been released, it wouldn't be released by the time episode 2 was ready and either by the time all the episodes were completed a single full scale product would either not yet be ready (due to integrating all features into the entire series) or be a distinctively inferior product (due to having no feedback or features that would have been integrated later in the cycle). Another being that even 2 years is often a short time for a game to be properly developed. Television is a lot more stable an industry than gaming. The majority of games do not make a profit. Personally, I think the biggest thing I have to disagree with you is your seeming perceptions of what is expected of a sequal. By such reasoning, KOTOR II wasn't a sequel (or maybe just a poor sequel). One of the big reasons gaming is in such a poor state is because of expectations like that. The thinking that everything has to be completely rebuilt from scratch. If you want to use TV analogies, they reuse actors, props, and sets across the entire length of a series and not just seasons. Movies will reuse actors, props, and sets from entire other movies.

And that's where you make a mistake. An "episode" is nothing other than just a game where they would like to create more. You see "full length" episodes. The .Hack games and Xenosaga being examples. The original .Hack was actually completed, Xenosaga not quite. There's no more guarantee that they'll make more than there is a guarantee on non-episodes there will be a sequel. The only thing you have is the early assurance they would like to make more. All it means is they have a bigger plan. That argument doesn't do episodic gaming any justice at all. I mean why buy one Tomb Raider game in 1996 when you can wait ten years and buy a whole bunch of Tomb Raider games! If you have a complaint against Tomb Raider games leaving you waiting between releases, why not? Episodes like we see in Half-Life 2, Sam & Max, and Sin are nothing more than a business model to attempt to get higher turnaround and feedback to help fund the rest of the game, really. That's all it really is. If you don't agree with the time between them, it's not hard to simply not buy them. It's a business model to try to cope with the rising costs of game development. And it does have consumer benefits, though nobody seems to care about those unless they're not met.

You can always just wait before buying.

Generally, anytime I see the word "sucks" it is part of whining.

People truly will whine about anything.

Rainbow Six?

There's a Gold Edition, which has both.