There's basically two instances where unreliable narrator were envoked and both were backed away from immediately.
Nobody would be happy having choices and character overwritten by such a thing, anyway. "What you choose to do doesn't matter, the narrator's just lying!" "You son of a... LYNCH HIM"
That's actually a woman from WW2. She had the most kills of any sniper in Stalingrad.
Why is a WW2 sniper working with Russian mercs to kill Delta Force last April? Isn't she too old?
Somewhat. But it is far more geek to have in-depth internet arguments about which elements of a fantasy book were borrowed by a particular fantasy vidyagame.
There is no quantity of geek. There only is geek and not geek.
Embrace it.
Only complaint I have is graphics. They're acceptable for the genre, but not good. I think even Marvel Ultimate Alliance 2 managed to look better. Which is really the only relevant comparison I can make for the genre. That and Torchlight.
Enjoyed the gameplay. Plotlines looked intriguing enough. Probably get it for PC.
Whoah whoah. Cryptic was sold to Perfect World, the chinese MMO company that also owns the developer of Torchlight.
I guess we won't be seeing Neverwinter.
That would be terrible. Design by a grand democratic committee not work. It'd produce an mess of incompatible ideas. Like having infants attempt engineering. It would collapse on itself.
The average audience member has no idea what it takes to make a game. Or how to make a feature actually work. They just get excited about features that sound cool.
Anyone else find it awkward that when the CoD fanbase is discussed, they are described as "tards" and "ADD kiddies" when, given the size of the base, CoD fans are probably actually the more normal group.
As opposed to, well, us. Food for thought.