Sand

I wholly disagree. Just look at the new skill system. That is way to oversimplified. I like the point system for it actually gauges how much one knows about a subject as well as give specific skills for specific action. Having only one force skill for all force use is just stupid.

I don't like abstractions. I prefer specifics.

That is prbably why I would never give a game a perfect score.

What I've seen of Saga/Star Wars is very good. How can you say that? It is over simplified and the changes were wholly unnecessary. Also it forces you to use minitures no matter what in order to make sense of the combat. I mean all distances uses squares instead of exact measurements of meters and feet. What the hell is up with that?!?!? Just how big is a square anyway? They left it very much undefined.

Absolutely no flaws whatsoever and that everyone who plays it absolutely loves it without reservation.

Giving a game a perfect score always raise my concerns. There is no such thing as the perfect game for the creators of the game are always imperfect beings.

3.5e is the best version of the game. I have read through the Saga version of the new Star Wars game which 4e is supposedly be based on and it was pretty much crap.

You said "you face" not "your face" so I gather you were talking about Face which seemed odd because I don't see Dirk hanging around here.

You might want to buy the expansions. My roommate got them and had spasms that lasted for hours. Also they open up the game for some really wierd looking mods.

Um... I don't. I compare BG to BG2, IWD 1 to IWD2, Fallout 1 to Fallout 2 to Fallout 3, and NWN1 to NWN2, in terms that each of those games are designed to be related to each other in a series, hence the numerals. Since Bioshock is not a sequel, to compare it to SS2 as one seems silly to me. Certainly there can be some parrallels, but Bioshock should be treated as a stand alone game without any baggage from previous works.

Face? Sorry, Dirk Bennedict is not here.

http://www.enworld.org/ At the top. Grrr... I don't see why we need a 4th Edition DnD. There is nothing wrong with 3.5e.

PETA focuses on its sphere. Its People's Ethical Treatment of Animals, not People's Ethical Treatment of Humans. Yes, terrorism is bad and all, but that is outside PETA's mandate and there are other organizations that cover that issue.

Since I haven't played System Shock 2 I do not have anything to compare it to. Besides from the look of it is a new IP. Its Bioshock, not System Shock 3. I don't see any reason why the two games should be comparable.

That spin would be how I would set it up, but keep the original concept the same.

I rather have progress made than nothing getting done at all. Since the majority of my views coincide with the Democrats then that is the way I will go.

Its a sports game. All sport games suck. Its in their nature to suck.

I'll download it then and give it a try.

I didn't like Gothic 1 and 2 for they lacked certain things I look for in a CRPG and from I heard about Gothic 3 they are missing in that game as well.

I have seen the video demo a while back. The one in which the main guy gets drilled in the chest. Graphically it does look impressive, but it doesn't seem my style of game that I like to play. Is there a playable demo for the PC available?

Fallout was many things but boring wasn't one of them and there were a lot of games with crappier graphics back in late 1990s. The screenshots of Bethesda's Fallout, as well statements from the designers themeselves, show that they totally discarded the rules system as while the gameplay style that made Fallout 1 and 2 fun.

That's okay. I still have your original quote available so it still stands, as you just said. HA!

Um... That is still a FPS.

I have only seen pics. Haven't played the Demo yet, but if it plays like a FPS then I don't see much use for it. I have gotten my FPS needs fulfilled with Bloodlines and Stalker.