Hell Kitty

^ You should write him a letter and tell him he's doing it wrong. I'm sure he'll appreciate it, unless he's too busy swimming around in his enormous piles of cash.

Apparently the remake allows you to switch between old and new graphics at will, which is nice.

I actually think that sounds great.

Nope, 360 & PC. http://www.eurogamer.net/videos/e3-splinte...-and-commentary

I loved the original two, but after that, when the series went for a cartoonish look and featured voiceovers with modern American accents, it was kinda like seeing the movie version of a book, and the characters looked and sounded nothing like you imagined them. I'll probably end up getting the remake on Xbox Live.

You can purchase additional items (furniture, clothing, hairstyle etc) from the online store, which requires you register your game, but otherwise the only DRM is apparently a DVD check.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGejBtXAzYQ

You put Anniversary below The Angel of Darkness, the game typically seen as the lowest point in the series? You crazy bastard. That's like when people rank Alien 3 or 4 above the first two.

Out of all the colours of the rainbow, green is the bestest and red is the crappiest. Everyone who thinks otherwise is lying or they've been bribed. It's the only thing that makes sense.

Sure, I think society needs a good reason for coming to that decision, you, seemingly, do not. So, what you're saying is that society should not have the right deny rights without establishing that having the right would cause harm? Basically, yeah. I think if the law allows the majority to deny rights to the minority without reason then the law is wrong.

That's because child abuse has victims. Who are the victims of gay marriage? Allowing blind people to drive would be dangerous. In what way is gay marriage dangerous? Sure, I think society needs a good reason for coming to that decision, you, seemingly, do not.

Than why ask such ridiculous questions? Lowering age of consent to infancy? What the hell?

What does "the way they put it together" mean? Did GoG need to put a whole lot of effort into including the FB? On the Fallout compilation DVD I've got there are some things like desktop wallpapers, maybe some soundtrack mp3s. The inclusion of such things doesn't make them an important part of the experience, it's just added extras, and people like added extras.

I don't think society should have the right to decide the issue, when the issue is denying rights.

I'm too busy banging broads and making loads of cash to play MMOs. That is, when I'm not bench-pressing kirottu. PS: "Bench-pressing" is a euphemism.

Before entering the space ship is the time to give up. Far Cry at least had some decent levels after the trigens appeared.

You might have played it that way but it's not what the games "wants" you to do. Both Far Cry and Crysis allow you to go in guns blazing or take a stealthy approach. I actually think Crysis gave you more options when it came to stealth.

If only those silly gays didn't believe in marriage, this totally wouldn't be an issue.

If a wrecked, derelict, mutant infested, radiation bathed sinkhole of human corpses that is Chernobyl isn't special, than nothing is. You're describing a location, not the graphics.

Surely if there is one thing you can't accuse STALKER of, it's rushed artwork. Game was in development for a bazillion years. I kinda get what you mean though, the graphics are merely functional without trying to be anything special. Claims like that just make me think that people have very limited experience with the genre. Since when did Oblivion rank below Descent to Undermountain?

I don't understand what you're trying to say. What does the death being either right or wrong mean? Probably a fair question. But i don't understand it. Can you rephrase? You said the death penalty isn't always wrong. What does that mean? The death penalty is not something that can be sometimes right or wrong. It's always right, unless later proven to be wrong. As taks mentioned, there's always a chance that someone innocent, or at least, not guilty enough, will get executed with most systems. So in my mind either you see the death of these people as being acceptable losses, thus the death penalty is "right", or you see their deaths as unacceptable, thus the death penalty is "wrong".

I don't understand what you're trying to say. What does the death being either right or wrong mean?

I agree with Aram. Being against the death penalty doesn't mean you think everyone can be rehabilitated or you don't believe certain people deserve to die, and it certainly doesn't mean anything as ridiculous as you aren't in touch with your humanity.

Posting from the future? Currently playing The Nameless Mod for DX.

Also there is whether or not you , though I can't remember what quest that was linked to. Yes, which is what makes her a racist. She doesn't trust certain folks because they are aliens.