Blank

Oh, so you can accurately guess what terrorists are thinking? I beseech you to join your nation's homeland security, for your help would be invaluable. edit: also, even if they are thinking the same thing, i am not the one killing anyone using that belief

who will gladly join me in martyrdom

That sounds like a probable case, but if so, then i don't like the jedi anymore :ph34r:

That basically summarizes everything you have said here. I don't see any problem with that opinion. for me personally, yes, it is black and white. There is the right thing to do, and there is the wrong thing to do. The wrong thing may be more appealing because you get to live, but if you get to live at the expense of others' lives then what kind of life is that? sick. I would rather do the right thing and get shot for my beliefs, becoming a type of martyr. and since i believe i will be going to heaven, and i already want to go now, then that's a perfect opportunity to glorify God and then get to have eternal fellowship with Him right afterward. of course, if you don't live to do the right thing (and thereby glorify God), then i guess there is no reason to care if it is the right thing or not.

By not killing him he displayed his own sadistic nature. he injures something then leaves it for dead to suffer. even if he was disgusted by how the situation turned out, that doesn't justify leaving somebody who you once cared about to suffer.

Hey man, the fact that she won me over with five general lines is a tribute to her character... or my stupidity. but i would like to think it was the former. edit: visas broke the 1/3 of the votes mark

yes i think the word "jedi" is what constitutes the LS. because that is the closest thing they say. but they never say "dark jedi" because then it wouldn't be a jedi.

LOL. Her personality is horrible no matter what! I think few people realise that because they are too busy analysing her physical attributes as opposed to her mental ones. well, i do that too sometimes... but i like Visas better in about every way.

i could ask him, he would just never answer. and he probably wouldn't recieve my question. lol. I don't know, though your explanation is mediocre, it is still an explanation. it just seems like when the jedi council is talking about "the one who will bring balance to the force", they are not talking about a personal connection to the force and it seems more to me like they are talking of a secret weapon prophecy, like Neo.

i have always wanted to be a good writer with a good story, but sadly i am not that good. i am sure the same goes for many other people here. i will just retain my writing fix by posting stuff on this forum like many other people here.

lol. you care enough to post a link that says you don't care. that's something...

(sorry, it was a different author's name so i thought...) but anyway. i liked the first one better because Fuzzy actually did come through for Sam. On the other things Fuzzy really disrespects Sam and it is hard to see how he could be considered Sam's friend. I mean, at least he is true to his word for the most part, but he just starts something else along with what he promised. i like the art though. unique and entertaining. The story is pretty good too. i just dislike Fuzzy, but he still makes the comic like you said, so i guess i do like him for that. poor sam

yeah, i liked the first one the best. funny stuff. Then the second one i started to really dislike fuzzy. and then by the time i got to the fanart, which depicted fuzzy very well, i hated fuzzy and wished that sam got rid of him.

Here is why i say it is illogical. Why would any LS jedi want to bring balance to the force? I would want to bring extreme imbalance to the force in the favour of my alignment. i've never heard anybody talk about this fallacy before, so i wondered what others would think of it.

lol, i chose malak only to discover that so did many others. i agree with what people said about how malak should have learned from revan, and malak wasn't very good tactically. he needed bastila just to have an edge over the republic. whereas Revan would have torn through the republic like he did the mandalorians. I don't see why people think Darth Maul is the dumbest. he was just another puppet of Palpatine like Dooku, that one chick with dual lightsabers in the clone wars cartoons, and then anakin too. they are all the same level of dumb, except anakin ends up redeeming himself by saving his son.

Yes. Korriban was a late addition to replace M4-78. The cave probably was meant to be there, and since it was already completed planted it on Korriban... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ah, smooth. as i always say, "if at first you don't succeed, make it look like you did."

Foxdez, that is exactly the point. Only lame jedi like Bastila and Anakin will fall to the darkside because of love. All the other pimp LS/grey Jedi like Exile, Revan, and Jolee have no problem with love and are actually motivated by it. You have to be a real loser to love somebody and then kill them (anakin) or try to kill them and fail (bastila) The thing about Visas is, her personality reveals no real cruelty or hate as one would expect from a sith. Even though she claims to be a sith, at heart, it doesn't seem that way. even when you go darkside, she doesn't display debauchery or a survival of the fittest sith attitude. Basically everyone replying here but you thinks Visas is better. And about love. Why else would one do charitable acts for others? there is no reason to, it would make no sense unless you were to gain something for yourself, and that is rarely the case during one's lifetime. Without love you just have selfishness and/or hate. Kalfear, i liked that scene with the handmaiden too. i agree with your rating of which scenes were better in the order you did.

ah, i agree then. i will bow out for now, since i don't have anything very constructive to say, and u guys seem to be doing fine on your own . but once i really disagree or really agree with something, then i'll be back.

lol, snap. you just picked a fight with me. Do you know what is in the Bible (the basis of Christian religion)? because if you did, then you would see that anyone commiting a crime is not adhering to the laws and precepts established therein, and therefore how can one blame the Bible for telling people to do crimes if it doesn't tell them to do crimes? This is where i agree with Shadow Paladin. The nation ideally is never wrong, unless their own laws are immoral. but if their laws are not immoral, then ideally they are never wrong. However, we are talking not just about ideality, but also reality. In reality, Azarkon has a point, that the nation doing evil is responsible, but by commiting the acts they did, they are going against their own laws, so is it the ideal nation's fault anymore? no, but it is the real nation's fault. i can't generalise everyone in that nation like Azarkon can, because everyone has their own opinion and to just label everyone guilty as a whole during their criminal acts, is just stupid and illogical. So i won't say it is the nation's fault, but it is the fault of a select conglomeration of people who had enough power to influence others for bad. Lol, fundamentalist christians. fundamentally adhering to the Bible, they are not wrong, so why would you hold them responsible if they didn't do anything that was truly based on the Bible? if it is a crime, then it is not based on the Bible, because God doesn't want us to sin. So then one who commits a sin is no longer under the label of being truly fundamental to the Bible.

Arkan, i can't stop laughing at your sig. lol. so funny

that was harsh. Harsh but funny, here are a couple of my favourite quotes from the article: talking about the enemy a.i. "Eventually, you discover that the best tactic is to either retreat and funnel them Pied Piper-style down corridors and take them down up-close one by one..." talking about the graphics "The real killer is the distinctly rubbery, glossy feel about everything. If you're not cringing at the latex enemies and their bizarre ragdoll death animations then you'll baulk at the artificial shininess of the world around you. Rocks should be gritty and harsh, not slick and shiny. Waterfalls shouldn't look like molten acrylic.

Do you normally appologise for the actions of others ? The answer is political. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> lol. i didn't notice myself do that. it is partially political, but i guess i naturally sympathize and regret reporting to you that i cannot change something which i would like to change. <afterthought> although, i could if i really wanted to, but i guess i don't really want to. i can sift through the history books as they are, with bias and all. the only disturbing thing is that one must wonder if they are getting the whole truth, even with bias it is okay, but when stuff is left out we can't do anything to get it, neh?

If by public morality, you mean a public indoctrinated into the service of ethnocentric nationalism (which is all that is truly imbued by the kind of education we're talking about), then I say down with it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> but if you went down with all the public indoctrination of morality then you would start seeing anarchical type attitudes from people. i think the public does need help, because left to their own devices, it gets ugly quick. i agree that they shouldn't feel guilty for what they didn't do, but that doesn't excuse the fact that in reality other people judge them just the same. to not apologize would just look bad because other countries attribute Germany's choices in history to modern-day Germany. It shouldn't necessarily be singled out for attention, but it might as well be. it was a bad one. there are other bad ones. but they don't single those out. Why not? i don't know. i am not a history book writer. sorry that i can't change it.

I assume you are asking for our personal opinions. I believe because the holocaust occurred, to deny it would make one a kind of co-conspirator for the whole ordeal. I think it is a good law, i think its reason for existing is because the German's want others to see how they repent and will not forget the mistakes they have made.

I dont think grown ups do. Teens with image issues maybe. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> **reads mkreku's post. reads SP's post. looks at SP's avatar. pauses. laughs.**