Dark Moth

Yup, a GTA-like ability to man vehicles would be nice.

No Yuthura? What is wrong with these forums?!! I'm a Bastila guy, but Yuthura was hot enough to at least earn a spot on the poll!

I won't say much to that, only that I recommend you read The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and The Life of Muhammad: A translation of Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah, a biography of Muhammad written by a pious Muslim. You may be unpleasantly surprised.

Yup, very ironic. It doesn't surprise me, to be honest with you. Many of those involved have no respect for other faiths, yet become outraged when someone insults their own. And to prove their point, they burn a Danish mission and ransack a Christian community. Also, for an update, a Catholic priest was shot dead in Turkey by a young Muslim who was chanting "Allah Achbar" (god is great).

"putsch" is German. Meanwhile, the 360 is hurting now, not from poor sales but from the supply not meeting the demand. A new factory is supposed to open, but not until later this year. BTW, maybe I'm stating the obvious, but I have a feeling Epiphany was a plant from Microsoft. "

I think we all know who the obtuse person is here. ^^^

I doubt that. The Seahawks' defense really isn't that great. They're biggest strength was their offense, which really shined in the first half, but just couldn't really hold it together, and sort of fell apart in the second half. But I do hand it to them for holding back our defense the way they did. Those guys just seemed to be all over Polamalu throughout most of the game. Meanwhile, the Steelers offense just wasn't playing their best. (their defense wasn't doing so well for a time, but that's another story) All their previous 8 games were built on a super-strong offensive in the first half, and I just didn't see that coming out of them at all until later.

Okay, I forgot that he made contact. But as for your other point, it wasn't "bad calls" as much as it was they just couldn't stop fouling. Sure there were a couple bad calls, but most were spot-on. The Seahaks deserved almost every penalty they got, even on just holding alone. Also, so many people here are quick to point out that the Seahawks were trying to "make us win". Aren't we all forgetting just how horribly the Steelers' offense was playing in the first half? They didn't even get a first down until later in the second quarter.

That's your reason? No, methinks it has something more to do with this: Steelers: 21 Seahawks: 10 The bad calls went against both sides, like Hasselback's fumble that wasn't ruled a fumble. And Ben did make the touchdown. The TD counts if the ball goes over the white line, and if you look closely, it just did. But I do agree it was pretty tough to tell. I dunno. Seattle had some bad calls, but I doubt they still would have won. I also think the Steelers were trying equally hard to let Seattle win. Let's not forget how horrible the Steelers' offense was playing in the first half. They went an entire first quarter without a first down, and had the ball for only about 6 minutes to Seattle's 14 near the end of the first half. Also, it can be argued that the score should have been more like 28-10. If Roethlisberger hadn't thrown that horrible interception, they most likely would have gotten that touchdown.

Whatever! At the moment I could care less what anyone here thinks of the game or American football. Practically nothing in the world can spoil my mood right now. (w00t) I gotta go celebrate now. So long.

The first half was close, but boring. It was 7-3 at halftime. The second half was not to be missed, though. There were some very wild plays, and two records were set as well.

The hell it was! That was 10x more exciting then the last Superbowl. (And no, not because the Steelers won) :D

Steelers: 21 Seahawks: 10 Steelers: Superbowl XL Champions Way to go, guys.

Oh yeah. Figures, it being the same guy who did "Basic Instinct". I almost forgot - "Wild Things". Go XX/XX action. *daydreams of Denise Richards*

Most of them don't, from my experience.

You can't "zing" your own post. Tsk tsk. Anyway so this isn't spam, I just saw "Ferris Beuller's day Off" The movie had its moments, but really wasn't as funny as people were telling me.

I want to get going on Muso's report, but it's going to feel awkward since he just went on a self-imposed hiatus a few days ago. No telling when he'll be back.

Geez, you guys are no fun. In case my sarcasm was poorly constructed, my "teeth fixation" was in jest. Only the acress who played Lucy did have a major overbite. ^_^ <_<

Actually both Appletons aren't bad at all. I wouldn't mind having both of them at the same time.

The first woman isn't even attractive. Big noses and nose rings are not turn-ons.

...but it was a TV production from 1988... what did you expect? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It still could have been better! It's not even the special effects that bothered me most as much as the bad acting and casting. And don't tell me they couldn't have gotten someone with better teeth. <_<

I saw the old BBC version of "The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe". And I don't intend to ever see it again. The special effects were terrible, the acting was poor (expecially the White Witch, oh god), and Lucy was in desperate need of some overbite-reduction surgery. <_<

This entire situation has gotten way too out of hand. For one thing, you'd think that with all the horrible statements we've seen coming out of the Muslim community in the ME regarding Jews, Christians, and Americans, they'd be more open to criticism on their own way of thinking for once. " And people think conservative Christians are way to zealous. Also, the response of the disgruntled Islamic community hasn't helped their cause in any way. These people object to their prophet being potrayed as (more or less) as an advocate of violence, yet they respond with violence? ... I think they're doing more harm to their image then the cartoon ever did. It's clear that these people involved have no respect for freedom of speech, nor are they able to handle jabs at their own faith. There shouldn't have even been an apology.

Did we help them against the Nazis - yes or no? The U.S. had been leaning toward the allies all along, even before the Zimmerman Telegram fiasco. Remember the Lusitania? And even farther back than that, for example, are the 1st and 2nd Morocco Crises. They probably would have declared war on Germany anyway. Both nations were part of the Triple Entente, and German actions prior to the outbreak of the war had only strengthened the Anglo-French alliance against Germany prior to that, such as with the Kruger Telegram Crisis and the two Morocco Crises. Also, why in the hell am I responding to this post anyway? This whole argument took place -what - almost a month ago? And you being so opinionated had to respond to it now? And I being equally opinionated had to respond to your response as well? I know what you're doing. I'm on to you. Shame, Metadigital. Shame on you. Welcome back, by the way.

That is why we take the path of the Sith, wise one.