Volourn

"this teenager" 12 year olds are teenagers now? Man, the world changes. People defending the cops are shameful. This idea that cops can get away with cold blooded murder is sickening. Why is the first choice always murder? There is no reason why the cops couldn't have handled this better so the kid could live. Sorry, but murdering someone because they had a fake gun is sick and twisted. He wasn't even committing a stupid crime. He was friggin' playing around. Evil to the core nazis. Every time someone defends a bad cop it makes it harder to praise the good ones who make the right decisions.

You want me to give reason why the game is better yet you have provided no reason why those other games are better. Double standard. Not surprising by a troll. Don't bother now as it's too late. BACK ON TOPIC: DA3 is better than you think it is and worse than the fanboys think it is.

"Bring on some examples of good things, then we can talk." Not my job to convince you anything. I'd rather discuss thing with people who aren't trolling this thread for reactions but read people's thoughts on the actual game. You made up your mind. It won't be changed. It's useless to try to change a troll's mind.Don't get butthurt because people called you out. BACK ON TOPIC: DA3 > Better than all of the crappy games you listed above but if you love them go post in those threads and better yet go play them. You'd have less time to troll that way.

What was innovative about it? It was fun (though I didn't bother finishing it) but it was not innovative. . "I can only imagine the hype it would've received if it were an isometric game with a worn out setting." WUT!?! It was friggin' hyped BIG TIME.

Says the guy who spams in a game thread he has hasn't played, has no real intention of playing, and just bashes it over and over as well as bashing those who like it just to get a reaction. Don't get mad that your trolling gets a reaction. That's obviously what you want. Don't get butthurt over it. BACK ON TOPIC: DA3 has flaws. It also has good things. *shrug*

Police at it again. Shoot without thinking. Horrible evil scumbag nazis.

I'm doxxing myself (again); I'm Ted Bouchard from North Bay, Ontario, Kanada. Anyone give a crap? No. Didin't think so.

Beckham = awesome. Giants still need to find a legit running back, though. And, better defense. And, better coaching (not counting head coach he got 2 championships).

"1) I did not see any praise in regards to the quests, so I just share my point of view. If there is, I'd like to get a link to some, other than Bioware forum." Check the Codex. I don't do your work for you. "I guess things like XCOM, EU4, Heroes games, deungeon crawlers or on line games like DotA 2, CS:Go or Arma 3 are beyond the scope of your perception?" All shallow crap. No better than facebook games. Tell me when you play REAL games that are DEEP. "I will probably try the DA:I, but only if it will hit some -75% or free status like EA has done occasionally with their other games on Origin (for example I got Battlefield 3 for free, but so far I did not even play it -.-). That way I will not regret wasting money on **** product, which the recent past experiences with Bioware made me think what the game is. If somehow the game will prove otherwise, then they will win back some points, but from what I've seen in gameplay videos, it only reinforces my bad opinion of their current product, both on combat and writing side." Good for you. Now go play games and talk about games you have actually experienced.

"Wish the ability bar was bigger though, 8 seems a bit too small considering you should have around 12 near the endgame." Should be unlimited. People blame it on consoles but I don't. This is a silly BIO choice to limit. It's a silly MMO bull. "No, it isn't, it's lower than Skyrim and ES crap" No. Hell no. Hell to the no.

Yeah, it's better than Skyrim and the rest of the ES crap.

"Those plenty of Bhaalspawn didn't have a close encounter with Sarevok and survived. When you think someone like Sarevok is hunting you, hiding is not a real option. Well you can try to hide in BG1 but you run into assassins often so your only choice left is to fight." Nonsense. "The nameless one also has a credible stake in his personal quest, why should he hide? After all, much of that story is constructed as a mystery and only towards the end do you discover that you even have a tangible enemy that you could "hide from"." Must explain all the TNOs that lived long lives that didn't do anything to complete the quest. Don't be so ignorant. "@Volourn You seem to have no idea how human interests work. I suggest you get on a soapbox and proclaim that you will save the world and tell us how long it took before you found yourself in a padded room." That's funny. Plenty of people in the real world proclaim they'll save the world and most of them are not in a padded room. Seriously, your whining is illogical and doesn't make any sense whatsoever. "Those plenty of Bhaalspawn didn't have a close encounter with Sarevok and survived. When you think someone like Sarevok is hunting you, hiding is not a real option. Well you can try to hide in BG1 but you run into assassins often so your only choice left is to fight." You run into them because you go straight to them. You could avoid assassins quite fine but it wouldn't be much of a game. Also, I bet you areone of the ones who hated BG2's plot of hunting down Irenicus because it wans't 'motivational' enough and it was 'too restrictive'. LMAO The motivations of the DA series are fine. No better or worse than BG or PST. And, certainly unlike one Drowsey pretends, they are very plausible but he doesn't know what plausible means. He seems to think it means 'i like it'. ha@ "not a single praise about the sotry line or some memorable quests," Lie. Even the Codex has praised some story aspects and quests. Even from people who dislike the game overall. Don't make stuff up. "but as a PC gamer that requires something more from the games than just poor jokes, sily romances and buttonmashing mindless combat with grind elements, I do not find it worth my time and money just to get pissed and regret both resources spent on it." Yup. Go enjoy your 'deep' facebook games 'PC gamer'. LOL0L0L0L0LLIP0P Why spend time whining about such a horrible game when you could be playing one of those fun and deep facebook games that PC gamers love sooooooo much. LMAO "Rules for a Rift fight: 1. Bring a mage with Dispel. 2. Preferably bring two mages with Dispel. 3. Bring all your mage friends with Dispel." That rule isn't needed.

"Plausible in the sense that its much easier to walk away from any human organization, especially an implausibly altruistic one than it is to walk away from your own blood or, in the case of the nameless one - "sins". Why would any PC force himself to participate in the thankless task of being cannon fodder for darkspawn? Why would anybody choose to be a jedi or a spectre? Why would such a ridiculous organization even exist in the first place? " "In BG its do or die, a pure fight for your own personal survival. In Torment its about self discovery and redemption, again, quite personal. Both motivations make perfect sense in the context the game provides." This is silly. Plenty of bhaalspawn avoid all the drama of being one. They hide and live relatively normal lives not being part of the big war. TNO could simply go hide somewhere. In both cases, the motivation comes from the PC (aka forced on them by the game). As a GW you end up in a situatuiion where if you say no to the GW you die. Period. So the motivation is saving yourself. It can also be about gaining power (evil) or saving the world (good). The same cna be argued for the Inquisiotor. In fact, plenty of times you can tell people you don't believe you are the 'chosen one'. \ Your logic seems frivilious - espicially since you seem okay with Jedi Order. The motivation is very plausible. Your definition of 'plausible' is rather weak. Not preferring something doesn't make it implausible. Do you even know what i means?

Meh. of all the things to compliant about graphics isn't one of them. The DAs and MEs have damn good graphics 9despite some hilariously awful closeups for certain characters plus their hands). Unlike the ES series which is literally just green puke.

"At least in BG you're forced into doing what you're doing by your lineage and fate and in PST by your mistakes your previous life. I understand that a story driven RPG must force upon the PC a certain sequence of events (either that or give up on the story, TES style), but for god's sake, let it at least be plausible." \How in the HOLY HELL are the GW any less 'plausible' than being a spawn of a god or a repeatedly reincarnated immortal? LMAO Some of you people's complaints are beyond asanine. You were better off just sticking with I 'don't like GW' instead of that nonsense. At least it be more intellectually more honest that way. "it is better if Hawke is a Grey Warden deserter from Ostagar" No. Hawke's background is absolutely fine as it. It also works because it allows the potential sibling to become a GW later in story. That wouldn't have been es as effective if Hawke was already a GW. It would have been lame tor reuse the GW hook. "And in Inquisition, the main character is a Grey Warden sent to investigate, and so the story begin..." I'm not deep into the game, but that is just lame. There is no need to make the Inquisitor a GW. He's already being accused of being the 'Chosen One' (not proven yet). He doesn't need to have GW thrown in there. You lack imagination. "They want to copy Skyrim, but they failed, the world is lifeless, there are mimes everywhere, much like SWTOR...it is fine for DA:O to have mimes population, it's an old game, but DA:I is a new gen isn't? An open world with awesome graphic... They don't even reach Skyrim level, even though Skyrim is dull with it's population repeating the same lines forever, but at least they have their rutines, they walk, they talk, they do their job, they sleep, they wake up...ect....same like in Oblivion, even it's cartoonish but the population feel alive" \You claim DA3 fails at 'miming' Skyrim because there are 'mimes' then go on and say Skyrim has 'mimes'. Stop trying to have it both ways. btw, Almiost all the bad parts of DA3 is the stuff it has in common with Skyrim. Proving yet again how much Betehsda games suck and how if you try to copy them it just taints your game. R00fles!

"Once drones attack me when i say Dragon Age is supposed to be about dragons especially the Archdemon, about relationship between dragons, Archdemon and Grey Wardens....they say "Star Wars is not about war between stars, Lord of the Rings is not about the owner of the ring", so i give that answer to you...." \Let me get this striaght... you sued to believe DA was about dragons then some posters told you it wans't about drgaons and made you change your mind/ WTH? "It is funny how come DA:O fans loathe Grey Wardens, " Not all do. "what do you guys like about DA:O anyway? Sex scenes?" Over 4 million people bought and played DA. I'm sure their reasoning for liking it for those who did varies. You seem to like DA because of grey wardens. I liked it for characters, fun game play, and aventuring. Plus dwarves. Mainly dwarves. "And it is weird "DA:O fans" hate everything about the game," They don't hate everything. And, if you ask different people they'll give you different things they like and different things they hate, People are varied. "then asking BioWare to create new games using Dragon Age title...and so we all get DA2 and now DA:I...thanks to "DA:O fans" And? P.S. Good video. Again, I perosnally like the wardens.

"Act 1 - find gold, 50 gold to be exact, then off to deep road, found an idol Act 2 - Kirkwal under Qunari attack, because someone stole their book, kill or deal with Qunari leader Act 3 - Meredith go nut, kill her, side with Mages or Templar doesn't matter" This sounda familiar. Oh yeah. It's BG2. LMAO "Want to know why Star Wars, LotR and many more sagas are epic and remembered? Because they all have identity, no matter the story is good or bad, it is remembered because of their identity, their central theme. Grey Warden sould be Dragon Age central theme. You see DA:O advertisment trailers? We being introduce with the cenral theme of DA, it is all about "what it means to be a Grey Warden", "Join us in the shadow where we stay vigilant...." You still haven't explained why the Wardens should be then 'DA theme'. btw, DA is remembered. It's why there's a part 3. Nice try, though. Again, you ignore the fact in your haste to spam about the GW that plenty of people (not me) LOATHED the idea of the GW and liked DA1 IN SPITE of them NOT BECAUSE of them. LMAO DA theme is politics. It's always has been. Loghain vs PC/that other idiot, Hawke climbing of the ranks of Kirkwall politics, and now the Inquisition. It's also about dragons. DRAGONS. D.R.A.G.O.N.S. It's called DRAGON Age NOT warden age for a reason. LMAO

You are silly. The Blight was finished the minute the Archdemon was killed so how could the sequels be about the blight? That's dumb. You claim the theme should be the warden, darkspawn, and archdemon then claim it shouldn't be. Also, ignoring the fact that the archdemon is dead so it can no longer be the focus. Also, DA2 was related to to the Blight. It's the entire reason why Hawke's family went running back to Kirkwall. Did you not pay attention? You seem so focused on overrtaing DA1 and think everything should be about the GW. Screw the GW. Is that it? You are mad because you aren't as grey warden anymore? HAHAHA! Grey Warden - soemthing that a lot of people (not me) didn't even like about DA and you want to keep it for all eternity. HAHAHAA! P.S. It would be nice, though, if Grey Warden was made a 'specialization', though as an option. But, as a focus? Nah. That was good for one game.

"Sure, it is going to much less common" Define 'much less'.

"Most PC users cannot play the game" Prove it.

"I guess it is somewhat refreshing that so many of you doubt these numbers, because maybe that means you all are good guys who treat women respectfully. That's important. But that also means we should believe women when they say they have been assaulted. " NEWSFLASH: Just like all men are not rapists not all women are honest angels who never lie. What is with this need to put women on a pedestal? That is so condescending towards women. Women are human beings. Their personality, morals, and beliefs vary. \Why are people like you so sexist? \This combo idea that men are just rape monsters and women are fragile little glass princesses is sic does no favors for anybody.

"So when someone is murdered, do we put the onus on the murdered person to provide the burden of proof? No, we we do a full investigation of the likely suspects, and expect them to provide evidence that they weren't involved or at fault. " That's not how it owrks. That's not how it should work. And, onyl evil nazis think it should work that way.

First I've heard of IGDA and they already reek of pieces of crap. They are literally attacking people/groups they approved of simply ebcause they followed someone on twitter. That's inane. Thwey probably don't even realize they are blocking an employee of theirs. Pathetic. Also, they seem to be broke their own rules of 'online harassment/bullying'. LMAO

"As a man, I have very little fear here, but that's because I never went around sleeping with people I didn't have a certain amount of trust built up with. And as a father, it is good to know that my daughter has the full support of the law in such a terrible situation. My number one goal is to raise her to be careful and always protect herself, but I can't keep her locked in her room forever." As a man, you must really hate yourself sicne it's very clear you believe men are monsters who rape little girls and you find women weak, pathetic, and need to be babied. that's really sad. Why do you disrespect women so much? You have no respect for your daughter at all. I wonder if you have a son and you just seem them as little rapists. \What the heck is wrong with people who find it acceptable to believe are weak pathetic little kids and men as just rabid uncontrollable rape monsters. Talk about twisted.

"I guess another simple lesson would be don't stick your junk in crazy." You chuckle but that kind of glib argument can be made to and admonish women (or men) who have relationships with abusers. Your logic is foolish. "Is that how the bill is phrased exactly?" Probably not. But, how is one supposed to determine how drunk is too drunk to give consent and what happens if both parties are past that limit? What happens if one .1 over and the other is .1 under? The cocnept is silly. Having drunk sex and then regretting it the next day does NOT make it rape. A law like this can make a miss of this. The law as is already is abuseable in this manner and then it coems down to he said/she said'.