Look, you're polite, and informative, but one can tell by the tone of your posts that you're also incredibly biased.
Maybe I am a foreigner, but maybe that's what it takes to look at the situation objectively.
I don't think I am particularly biased. I am mainly explaining the Greek Government's official position and I am well placed to know what is at stake. Personally, I couldn't care less about what happens to FYROM, but I do believe Greece's arguments are reasonable enough. If Greece was facing some western European country, I am sure it would adopt a more flexible stance. However, Greece is facing a country which has persistently and aggressively expressed its intention to use the Greek Macedonian symbols as its own, while they are already being used by its Greek counterparts. Greece's position is no more no less than self defense. Moreover, Greece is ready to accept a compromise of a composite name for FYROM (like the examples I mentioned previously) but the latter insists on getting the name of plain "Macedonia" instead.
If you could just give me some counter arguments, it would help me understand how you view this situation.
Everybody in Europe/the world already knows that Alexander the Great was Greek. All the schools teach it. All the historians definately know it. So how about letting your northern neighbouring slavs make fool out of themselves and practice revisionism as much as they want. No one will take them seriously anyway. They will be the laughing stock the instant they print his face on the flag. It's a win-win solution in the long run.