Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

I am very disappointed to hear the party will be reduced to five.


  • Please log in to reply
142 replies to this topic

#141
Ninjamestari

Ninjamestari

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 459 posts

 

With lesser number of enemies in encounters, it also means inflated defense and HP on enemies.

 

How does it follow that encounters having fewer enemies necessitates enemies having more health?

 

 

 

Necessitate, no, often leads to that anyway, yes.



#142
MountainTiger

MountainTiger

    (2) Evoker

  • Members
  • 60 posts

 

I think the difference is that 90% or so of fights in the IE games can be won with nothing more than haste

 

 

Yeah especially old BG1 or IWD1 version of haste = diablo

 

 

That's not fair; in Diablo, you have to click more than once on most enemies.



#143
Regggler

Regggler

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 114 posts
  • Location:Sigil
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

I'm currently replaying PoE, and I have to agree with the assessment that the ****ton of active skills (including items) requires quite a lot to remember. Having one less party member would alleviate that. I'm not sure if that's necessary for me personally, though. I don't really have a problem if I forget using my figurines for a fight or two.

 

To be honest, my favourite party size would be (number of available companions) + 1. I'm sure five will be fine, though.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users