Surreptishus Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 Umm... I would have thought the spoiler thing is a request. Not necessarily something one has to follow to the letter.
Volourn Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 Wolf Creek: Uhuh. That's all I gots to say about this movie... DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.
Kelverin Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 Wolf Creek: Uhuh. That's all I gots to say about this movie... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Man, you watch some ****ty movies. J1 Visa Southern California Cleaning
Volourn Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 And? DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.
Kelverin Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 And? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I can see watching a bad movie every now and then but everyday? I just thought I would share that with you. J1 Visa Southern California Cleaning
blue Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 Also, please use [ spoiler ] tags Sorry, mom. I didn't know that was possible, but will do. SPOILER: . . . . . . . Btw, what was wrong with the style I used?
Volourn Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 "I can see watching a bad movie every now and then but everyday? I just thought I would share that with you." And? DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.
Kelverin Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 And what? J1 Visa Southern California Cleaning
Amentep Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 Wolf Creek: Uhuh. That's all I gots to say about this movie... I totally agree with you there...definately not a good film, albiet not quite as dissapointing to me as High Tension was. I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man
Amentep Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 Umm... I would have thought the spoiler thing is a request. Not necessarily something one has to follow to the letter. I dunno, given that it seems all of mine and Blue's discussion over V for Vendetta seems to have been blocked out (about the movie, about the comic and about othe dystopian future movies like 1984, Brazil and so forth that I'd hardly consider spoilerific), it seemed a little more than a request, thus why I kinda thought some clarification was needed. I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man
Gfted1 Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 So, if we say anything about a movie except it was "good" or "bad" we have to add spoiler tags? Holy moly meta got a lot of editing to do on these 51 pages! "I'm your biggest fan, Ill follow you until you love me, Papa"
Darth Launch Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 I watched Rocky II and Capote today... I love Sylvester Stallone... who could have thought he had the potential to be incredibly romantic ^_^... and Philip Seymour Hoffman was the only reason I felt Capote was even worth watching really [color=gray][i]OO-TINI![/i][/color]
metadigital Posted September 16, 2006 Posted September 16, 2006 Btw, what was wrong with the style I used? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It sucks? Umm... I would have thought the spoiler thing is a request. Not necessarily something one has to follow to the letter. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I dunno, given that it seems all of mine and Blue's discussion over V for Vendetta seems to have been blocked out (about the movie, about the comic and about othe dystopian future movies like 1984, Brazil and so forth that I'd hardly consider spoilerific), it seemed a little more than a request, thus why I kinda thought some clarification was needed. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yeah, I don't always have limitless time to edit each and every post to pefection (except mine, of course ) so I may have been a little heavy-handed with the spoiler tags on this occasion. Then again, it's not like the text is banished from sight forever: I'm not building a book bonfire ... just try not to reveal the endings / critical plot twists / etc of books / films / plays under discussion, without wrapping them in the discreet [ spoiler ] tags. No matter how old they are. Some people are only just beginning their life journeys: the fact that 1984 was written half a century ago is irrelevant to a teenager about to read it, for example. I trust this makes sense. PM me if you need further clarification. (And yes, it is a request, not an order: this is all about being nice to others here; try to imagine how you would feel if you were about to read an Alexandre Dumas novel and someone tells you the denouement ... there goes fifty thousand words of anticipation!) I notice several older film discussions - including the end to the original Poseidon Adventure haven't been edited <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You're right. The person responsible has been shot. And the person responsible for shooting the person resposible has also been shot. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Darth Drabek Posted September 16, 2006 Posted September 16, 2006 You're right. The person responsible has been shot.And the person responsible for shooting the person resposible has also been shot. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I thought it was customary to "sack" those responsible for such things. baby, take off your beret everyone's a critic and most people are DJs
metadigital Posted September 16, 2006 Posted September 16, 2006 You keep your perverted fetishes to yorself, Mr Drabek. That was a quote from Holy Grail, in case you didn't know. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Darth Drabek Posted September 16, 2006 Posted September 16, 2006 Have you considered a vacation in Sweden? The opening titles, right. But I could have sworn my old VHS copy used the verb "sacked." Maybe I'm craaaaaaazy. Probably. baby, take off your beret everyone's a critic and most people are DJs
metadigital Posted September 16, 2006 Posted September 16, 2006 Yes. Now watching M OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Darth Launch Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 I saw Little Miss Sunshine today... it was pretty good... I like Steve Carell [color=gray][i]OO-TINI![/i][/color]
Surreptishus Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 I saw Little Miss Sunshine today... it was pretty good... I like Steve Carell <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ME too! I will try and catch this film in the cinema before monday.
Draken Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Who doesn't like Steve Carell? I watched Raising Arizona. Nice film. Nic Cage's character is hilarious. Seriously, only like, three people can touch my body
Deraldin Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 I'm currently watching Wing Commander on TV, because there really is nothing else on. )
kirottu Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Crank. Had some extremely funny parts. Where else you can see Jason Statham running around city in hospital robe and with an erection. :D This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Kor Qel Droma Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Is that more realistic than when he flipped his car upside down to ditch the bomb planted underneath in the Transporter 2 Kirottu? LA Confidential just finished up on one of the movie networks. I own this on DVD and try not to miss it whenever its on. A wonderful performance from Guy Pearce is upstaged by Russel Crowe acting like himself. This is an excellent show and I'd recommend it to anyone who doesn't mind some violence with their whodunits. Jaguars4ever is still alive. No word of a lie.
kirottu Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Is that more realistic than when he flipped his car upside down to ditch the bomb planted underneath in the Transporter 2 Kirottu? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Erm, not sure about the realistic part. In the movie he has been poisoned and the only thing that slows the poison down is adrenaline. The "running around in city" scene happens when he has just injected himself with synthetic adrenaline. He does all kinds of really wacky stuff to get his adrenaline flowing to live long enough to kill his poisoner. This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Lucius Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Lady in the water yesterday, I liked it. DENMARK! It appears that I have not yet found a sig to replace the one about me not being banned... interesting.
Recommended Posts