Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

Please give us an optional third person camera.


  • Please log in to reply
116 replies to this topic

#81
Bandy

Bandy

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 18 posts
  • Location:Wishing I was in the La Cloche

Also can add, there is a Kingdom Come Deliverance  mod for a TPV camera that works well when the player is on horseback -- horse is horrible if you are prone to motion sickness -- however, once off the horse the TPV looks terrible: the avatar animations are awful.  So one can see how much work needs to go into a proper TPV, I appreciate that, but doesn't make it more palatable as a player prone to motion sickness.

 

What I imagine is the case here, is that a TPV mod can be made and not be perfect but will help us out some.  But if the devs say they will provide a TPV and it isn't perfectly executed, well, there will be he!! to pay...


Edited by Bandy, 15 December 2018 - 12:34 AM.


#82
fchopin

fchopin

    (0) Nub

  • Initiates
  • 3 posts
  • Location:UK London
  • PSN Portable ID:161132177931

I also want third person option as i don't play game that only have first person.


  • DekarServerbot likes this

#83
LadyCrimson

LadyCrimson

    Obsidian VIP

  • Members
  • 9163 posts
  • Location:Candyland
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

 

 

I would imagine allowing both FPV and TPV iisn't just a cosmetic change and it would generally screw up the shooting mechanics, for at least one of the perspectives. The Bethesda Fallout games, for instance, had terrible shooting, and I can only assume the ability to use both perspectives was part of it.

That was not the reason for it, Bethesda fallouts did not use shooting mechanics like "you point, you hit" it was more if your stats say you will miss, you will miss even if you are 1inch away from the enemy. NewVegas added actual aiming and using sights, so they are capable of doing it properly even when using ****ty engine

I don't think that was true outside of vats. I seem to recall skills affecting damage but not whether you could hit your target or not. Or perhaps that was just in New Vegas.

In any case, the aiming mechanics for third person shouldn't be the same as for first person. Allowing for the two should impact the design significantly.

 

I played Fallout:NV without using VATS just fine (I don't like VATS at all), the shooting mechanics were ok without it. I mean, it wasn't true fps shooter smooth, but it worked fine/wasn't a problem. But yeah that's not the same thing as 3rd person combat visual design/mechanics.

 

I remember when people wanted Borderlands in 3rd person. You could force it using some dev commands or something (I don't remember exactly) but while it sorta worked, it looked and felt awkward (aiming was off by a mile) and was obviously "unfinished"/not meant to be played that way. The indie survival alpha game 7 Days to Die also had a crude 3rd person that they tried to test but it was barely functional and they've never tried to improve it so hardly anyone uses it. It would definitely impact time/work to make both 1st and 3rd feel and behave "right".

 

Could they do both? Yes, if they felt it was worth their time and the way they've set up gameplay would work with both. No idea if they will, however.

 

As to viewing your character - I only care about that if they make fashion a big deal in the game. Why bother with collectable funny wizard hats or recoloring clothing (as example) if I can't see it. Especially if it's not even MP where at least you're dressing up for other players. Might've been ok in the paper-doll only days but not so much now, for me. That said, an idle/non-combat vanity-camera would be fine.


Edited by LadyCrimson, 11 December 2018 - 05:19 AM.


#84
IndiraLightfoot

IndiraLightfoot

    Apex of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 5588 posts
  • Location:Over the Hills and Far Away
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

Same here. I played through F:NV without using VATS. I tried it in another playthrough, but I didn't enjoy it.



#85
Mikeymoonshine

Mikeymoonshine

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 337 posts
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
First person is ok with me but I do like to be able to see my character sometimes. I'm also hoping there is a way to holster your weapon because every demo i have seen of this seems to have the weapon drawn all the time, even on the ship.

#86
rjshae

rjshae

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 5075 posts
  • Location:Seattle, WA
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

Or at the very least, provide a modding option to enable other camera views. Thanks!



#87
Undecaf

Undecaf

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 763 posts
  • Location:Finland
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I'd rather they don't waste time adding a third person if it takes resources away from other areas of the game. Polish is my priority.

 

Same here. I'd want them to hone the perspective they have work the best it can for an RPG.

 

 

 

 

And with that in mind, in this interview they said:

 

 


I know when we put our combat system together, it was really important that it be an RPG...

...

 

We really don't want people to be saying, "Wow, this is a great RPG, you know the combat is just okay, but the RPG stuff is great."

...

 

One of our goals is that we want combat to be fun. Obviously our combat isn't going to be as good as Call of Duty because that's not what we are here to do.

 

So, with their chosen perspective it would seem like FPS is the way to go. But rather than doing something that, to almost everyone, seems like a really tired FPS, they should more boldly lean towards the RPG side of it and try out other forms of design. I keep harping about this, but I just can't get over it.


Edited by Undecaf, 11 December 2018 - 12:18 PM.


#88
esyvjrt

esyvjrt

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 105 posts

I was actually glad to know that it will be just first-person, just because it means that everything will be first-person and no third-person sections.  Not interested in third-person for myself at all, but i am not sure if its the best decision since so much people prefer it.

They should really make sure if is the best for the sales, and maybe make it easy to mod.



#89
Ethics Gradient

Ethics Gradient

    (11) Wizard

  • Members
  • 1615 posts
  • Location:NJ
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
  • Black Isle Bastard!

Not interested in third-person for myself at all, but i am not sure if its the best decision since so much people prefer it.

They should really make sure if is the best for the sales, and maybe make it easy to mod.

 

Mikey has since added some clarification regarding his original statement.  Saying that The Outer Worlds will not include extended mod support or a third-person-camera wasn't just an attempt to gauge interest among the fanbase.  It is stuff that is legitimately not going to be on the roadmap due to time and resource constraints.

 

Even knowing now how the community would like to see them happen, such concepts will have to be revisited during later releases if the debut of TOW is a success.


  • IndiraLightfoot and Wormerine like this

#90
fchopin

fchopin

    (0) Nub

  • Initiates
  • 3 posts
  • Location:UK London
  • PSN Portable ID:161132177931

If there is no third person option please tell us as soon as you can so we do not waist any more time on this game and also to stop from pestering you.



#91
Bandy

Bandy

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 18 posts
  • Location:Wishing I was in the La Cloche

If there is no third person option please tell us as soon as you can so we do not waist any more time on this game and also to stop from pestering you.

 

I think they already have said so unfortunately, but as I posted at top of this page, a mod is always possible sometime after release, and this saved KCD for me and others.  So I'm not going to despair and will support this project, otherwise how are we going to continue to get good games from this proven game house? 



#92
keriana

keriana

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 23 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

Hopefully they will have 3rd person for future games, then, if they can't add it to this one. I don't buy games that are first-person only. Now that they are owned by Microsoft, they should have plenty of funding for future games.


Edited by keriana, 15 December 2018 - 08:17 AM.

  • DekarServerbot likes this

#93
DekarServerbot

DekarServerbot

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 15 posts

Hopefully they will have 3rd person for future games, then, if they can't add it to this one. I don't buy games that are first-person only. Now that they are owned by Microsoft, they should have plenty of funding for future games.

 

Second that, I really hate having a camera fixed on my character's stomach that bumps like if it was hold with grandma's ****. Plus it really breaks the immersion for me since it blocks my other 4 senses. The only time i saw a good FPS was in Doom and Doom 2, but sadly most people married with goldeneye's one.

Please, If you can add a third person camera i will remove my last doubt and will preorder this game as soon as possible


  • Mirandel likes this

#94
Pidesco

Pidesco

    Global Moderator

  • Global Moderators
  • 6551 posts
  • Location:Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Lords of the Eastern Reach Backer
  • Deadfire Gold Backer
  • Fig Backer

 

Hopefully they will have 3rd person for future games, then, if they can't add it to this one. I don't buy games that are first-person only. Now that they are owned by Microsoft, they should have plenty of funding for future games.

 

Second that, I really hate having a camera fixed on my character's stomach that bumps like if it was hold with grandma's ****. Plus it really breaks the immersion for me since it blocks my other 4 senses. The only time i saw a good FPS was in Doom and Doom 2, but sadly most people married with goldeneye's one.

Please, If you can add a third person camera i will remove my last doubt and will preorder this game as soon as possible

 

 

Yes, if a first person game doesn't allow you to lick and sniff enemy robots, it's first person in name only.



#95
MagisterTremere

MagisterTremere

    (0) Nub

  • Initiates
  • 3 posts
  • Location:Europe

I've played First-Person games before and this "feeling of immersion" that people keep referring to never seems to manifest itself with me. All I ever get is lightheaded from the movement and the lack of proper peripheral vision. Along with this is the often bad sound design that made it difficult to determine from which direction something is coming/moving.

Come on Obsidian. Add a third person perspective. You can do this! You should do this!



#96
jonathansanity

jonathansanity

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 10 posts

I could not play far cry 5 because of the fixed first person, got really bad motion sickness from the game. I saw many threads about how to fix it but none of it worked for me. Hopefully we can get an optional third person here. Loved your games. Especially New vegas and Deadfire.


  • DekarServerbot likes this

#97
Chairchucker

Chairchucker

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 476 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer

I've played First-Person games before and this "feeling of immersion" that people keep referring to never seems to manifest itself with me. All I ever get is lightheaded from the movement and the lack of proper peripheral vision. Along with this is the often bad sound design that made it difficult to determine from which direction something is coming/moving.

Come on Obsidian. Add a third person perspective. You can do this! You should do this!


They can't because there isn't enough money in their budget and they shouldn't for the same reason.

#98
BillyCorgan

BillyCorgan

    (4) Theurgist

  • Members
  • 237 posts
  • Location:★ Look up here, I'm in heaven
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer

If they want to add this option, fine for those who love, but personally I NEVER play a game like this in TPS view... it's just awful (especially when the title is planned for the view to the first person). For example in recent Fallout this view is extremely ugly (with poor animations).



#99
DekarServerbot

DekarServerbot

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 15 posts

 

I'd rather they don't waste time adding a third person if it takes resources away from other areas of the game. Polish is my priority.

 

Same here. I'd want them to hone the perspective they have work the best it can for an RPG.

 

 

 

 

And with that in mind, in this interview they said:

 

 


I know when we put our combat system together, it was really important that it be an RPG...

...

 

We really don't want people to be saying, "Wow, this is a great RPG, you know the combat is just okay, but the RPG stuff is great."

...

 

One of our goals is that we want combat to be fun. Obviously our combat isn't going to be as good as Call of Duty because that's not what we are here to do.

 

So, with their chosen perspective it would seem like FPS is the way to go. But rather than doing something that, to almost everyone, seems like a really tired FPS, they should more boldly lean towards the RPG side of it and try out other forms of design. I keep harping about this, but I just can't get over it.

 

 

the issue is that i would preffer even a turn based final fantasy one rpg combat than a FPS one, i never found those fun after doom 2, name goldeneye, bioshock, halo, half life, metroid prime, those are games i won't touch with a stick at 20 feet... in fact, i even found redsteel frustrating, just liked the sword combat parts



#100
Blodhemn

Blodhemn

    (7) Enchanter

  • Members
  • 805 posts
Why are you even here then? Shouldn't you at least be a 20ft pole's length away from the forum?
  • Wormerine and daven like this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users