Amentep

No, the actual literal meaning is that there is not a single person who had their expectations met. "Everybody" is a singular pronoun. It just looks like a plural one. Of course, it's incredibly pedantic to point that out, since we all know what Unskilled actually meant (what you say above)... but, technically, he was wrong. You can't say this game DID meet everybody's expectations and you can't (technically) say that it DIDN'T meet everybody's expectations. You can say, however, that it did not meet all expectations without anyone being able to nitpick at your choice of words. (since "all" is plural) Yeah, I think I should check into things a bit more before making big posts that are basically wrong. Made an example of how presumption can lead to ****ups myself there. Welcome to the club! EDIT: fixed quote.

I really wasn't trying to be pedantic...I thought he was making a sweeping generalization. Apologies if I was wrong.

unskilled-: "What AP did was fail to meet everybody's expectations." Me: "It hasn't failed to meet mine, please quit making statements about my opinions." You: "He said everybody's expectations, not anyone's." As far as I can tell you implied that unskilled- wasn't speaking for me like I claimed he was. Since everybody is every person and I'm a person saying "everybody's expectations" makes it a statement about every person's expectations which includes my own. Since my expectations have been met, his statement wasn't accurate. My entire point is that we should try to avoid sweeping generalizations.

Other than the potential for horrible mutation (and horrible mutations killing me), The Pitt was a lovely place. Honestly I never really felt Fallout's strength was in the large cities; vastly preferred the smaller ones.

Fixed for you. My point still stands that I'm a part of "everybody" Egads, that sounds dodgy.

It hasn't failed to meet mine, please quit making statements about my opinions. He said everybody's expectations, not anyone's. I'm not a part of everybody? Did I get voted out of the human race or something while I wasn't looking? Everybody = everyone = every person Anyone = any person at all Saying something "fails to meet everybody's expectations" is equivalent to saying "did not meet anyone's expectations" It'd be more accurate to say something like "What AP did was fail to meet the expectations of a not insignificant number of people who played it (the exact number in comparison to those who did still being open to conjecture at this point)."

I read "bow" as "blow" for some reason...

They're definitely seen. Don't know if you can ever ride in one (so far I've only played long enough to prove myself incredibly incompetent in lining my horse up with a hitching post, hilariously jumping over fences instead.)

It took me several months to make a face that didn't look like it had exploded in Oblivion, regardless of the race (well, no I take it back, I just didn't worry about the face of the lizard people although I hated their scale coloration)

It hasn't failed to meet mine, please quit making statements about my opinions. I played and loved Mass Effect 2, but come on this game is not Mass Effect Gaiden: Alpha Protocol. Comparing them is a useless endeavor; and given that they're vastly different games in what they're trying to do any comparison is only going to scratch the surface of the good and bad in either game.

There was a lot of setting detail, or I guess world background, but it wasn't in the form of information dumps through talking to a wide variety of people in a bunch of different towns all over the place. It was instead put in books you could easily choose not to read. This doesn't mean that is how DS has to continue, and could easily use the world background as a basis for creating something more realized than the original.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMac7RkZmr8...feature=related Ocarina of Time, God of War 3, System Shock 2 (?), Lost Planet 2, Halo 3, Gears of War 2 etc... This ain't all that original. I never said it was original, just that I wanted future games to tackle the idea.

Silent Hill was directed by Christophe Gans (Brotherhood of the Wolf). He's was going to be working on an adaption of Onimusha but due to delays he's moved onto another film (and in fact I think the same thing happened with Silent Hill 2) About Uwe Boll and German law, I think that I've read that they've changed the tax law that he had used to film his earliest films.

I hope that the system they come up with is logically derived from what went on before, which AIUI was a class system (with DS1) or a class system with skills (in DS2) I seem to recall magic in DS1 being a big pain (powerful, but a pain) because of switching spellbooks. Given what little we know about the game at this time, its hard to say how they'll implement things. Hopefully they game will be balanced and fun however the player chooses to make their character.

I concur - Ed Wood couldn't keep track of editing night-day-night footage - in the same scene - either.

I saw three - House of the Dead, Alone in the Dark and BloodRayne - in the theater! Dungeon Seige actually came out at a point where I couldn't get to the theater to see it or I'd have probably ended up seeing it as well.

Alone in the Dark was just...just...I'm not sure what it was but it was about as bad as anything I've ever seen (inexplicable jumps in time, incoherent plot, characters that made no sense). It made House of the Dead seem awesome in comparison.

So you just accept best guesses and estimates and made up figures. okay. Whatever you choose for your career, don't be a statistician. You'd hate it. Statistics should be very clear in methodology in gathering data and in the margin of error created from extrapolating the data into the broader population. There are very clear guidelines as to how to do this and generally speaking the mathematics is sound (the typical problem with "lies, damn lies and statistics" lies in the methodology (non random samples is a big problem), trying to obfuscate margin of errors or poor application of the data to non-supportable results). Anyhow, good statistics are fairly different from best guesses and will have some logic behind their provided information. Statistics has more fudging numbers and making questionable assumptions than pretty much any other branch of mathematics. The problems with statistics is typically more a problem of application and data gathering than in the mathematics part of it. That's why people can distort what statistics mean for what they want them to mean and why you should take them with a grain of salt if not presented with methodology and margin of error (and once you read the methodology you may still want to take them with a grain of salt). This is important to this discussion, in my mind, because the debate over global warming isn't really the numbers per se, but how the numbers are gathered, whether the numbers are relevant, and whether they mean what we think they mean. Which is the same problem with statistical data.

"Fun" has a new definition these days. You won't get old-school fun anymore. Recent polls show the public want glossy soulless 15hr snack-meals. Controls should be limited to [O] and [X] buttons, no R1,2 or L1,2, that's too complicated. Two ways to swing the oversized manga-sword, a three-inch glowing circle around your avatar so you can't miss it. An auto-pilot mode in case you need to take a leak or wanna watch some tee-wee while your hero is levelled. Once in a while they throw in some bikini-clad playthings to please the boys, or some dwarven gay-pr0n when faced with accusations of political incorrectness. Brave new world dude.. Gotto find a way to please or self-negate your starved ego. J. Seriously though, I don't think that modern games are any better/worse than they've always been. Lots of chaff, not as much good stuff and the good stuff varies a bit from person to person. But I got into RPGs back in the days of the C64 and as much as I love those games, I understand that games have evolved and look for ways to enjoy the games of now. Again just because things are different it doesn't make them bad.

Which raises the question - can weapons be "destroyed" to make repair kits? Or will one have to sell extra weapons fo rthe caps to buy a repair kit.

I was under the impression that JE didn't sell awfully, just not at blockbuster levels either. (I'd love to see a sequel from Bioware, personally).

How about Barrels instead? Only if the barrels come in crates. Voice Over: "The crate, container. An RPG staple barely alive." Voice Over (continued): "Gentlemen, we can rebuild them. We have the technology. We have the capability to build the world's first barrel-crate. Dungeon Seige III will be that game. We can make them better than they were before. Better, stronger, more capacity." Title Card: The Six Million Dollar Crate

Dunno, but I'd love to play a game with "painted" graphics. Odin Sphere. 100% hand drawn goodness, I think thats as close as one can get.(As an aside, how come so many people are changing their profile picture?) Crap, I was reading the other day about an upcoming game that tried to have their 3D visuals look like a painting, but for the life of me I can't remember the name of the game. Oh and I change my avatar periodically and have since the glory days of BIS.