MrBrown

https://www.engadget.com/gaming/steam-now-tells-gamers-up-front-that-theyre-buying-a-license-not-a-game-085106522.html?guccounter=1

In this other article https://www.wargamer.com/sunderfolk/interview-gloomhaven-inspired-by-board-game they talk quite freely about how it's drawing from the Gloomhaven board game. Which I found funny, because game developers generally avoid mentioning other video games like the plague. Apparently it's ok if it's an another media? And Gloomhaven has it's own video game too.

Didn't know games still went gold https://store.steampowered.com/news/app/1845910/view/4697907940253179422?l=english

That's a big negative for me. None of Bethesda's games needed bigger maps, they needed more variety in what's already there.

https://www.ign.com/articles/sony-delists-original-horizon-zero-dawn-on-pc-forces-psn-requirement-for-remaster

1. Woke. Mainly because people love to hate. 2. Character designs. Mainly because it's really easy to make youtube content analyzing it.

Dustborn must be the perfect game for you.

I think it's a good indication of how content people are with the game. Sometimes it's for stupid reasons, but sometimes it's for good reasons, and you have to read the reviews to get a general idea why. For new games with no big franchise to bring a load of expectations, a review trends tend to be more informative of actual quality, I've found.

Ubisoft just can't get it right. https://www.tweaktown.com/news/100669/ubisoft-pulls-out-of-tokyo-game-show-after-mounting-assassins-creed-shadows-controversy/index.html

Getting trashed in steam reviews.

https://www.gamefile.news/p/microsoft-gaming-layoffs-xbox-650

https://www.eurogamer.net/the-eurogamer-100

This epitome of disaster has been interesting to follow. https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/3/24234909/sony-concord-ps5-shutdown-poor-sales-launch-pc

https://www.ign.com/articles/concord-is-estimated-to-have-sold-only-25000-units-heres-why-analysts-think-its-failing

Vampire Survivors gets more absurd each update.

A year since release, and they've now gone full circle and are making Diablo 4 quite similar to Diablo 3. https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/diablo-4s-next-update-makes-season-of-loot-reborn-look-like-a-hotfix-a-new-level-cap-of-60-new-difficulty-levels-and-the-return-of-runewords-all-in-season-6

https://www.remedygames.com/article/remedy-and-annapurna-announce-a-strategic-cooperation-agreement

Looks like we have a new winner for the biggest failures of games: https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2024/08/24/playstations-concord-did-not-break-700-players-on-steam-on-launch-day/

I'm ok with that. Can't make the same game so many times without switching things around, and they seem to keep a lot of stuff from 5-6 like hex grids, districts, and no stacking of units.

They were busy with Anthem. Also had at least one big redesign.

https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/xbox/microsoft-and-activision-have-formed-a-new-team-within-blizzard-to-work-on-smaller-aa-games-based-on-existing-ip