213374U

This is a pretty silly thing to discuss. It would take a whole 15 seconds to program the option to have the game start with X skill points instead of zero, based on savegame X. That is about as much time as you would conceivably need to cheat up your character to the same stats, should you want to blow game balance to smithereens. So it's not so much "to cheat or not to cheat", but "to take the featured shortcut to cheat or not". End of thread.

That's SIR Jorian to yu0, n00b - I mean, peasant.

Hehe, yeah. I'll take pre-made faces over "the emperor sports the same hairdo as 3/4 of all peasants you meet"-style customization any day.

Yeah, I hear that to play games, you need this odd device known as a "kom-pyoo-tarr". A piece of paper and a pencil is all you should ever need to game, I tells ya! Consoles get more than their fair share of exclusive titles.

Haha, Sarko is the man. "Chauvinist pig!"

Demon plz.

I suppose the very notion of an intimate relationship with some guy that feeds off your life force to keep going and bends your will like he isn't even trying is necessarily "creepy". I don't think Darth Nihilus is the kind of guy that picks you up after work, takes you to the movies, buys you popcorn, etc. He's more like the dark brooding type, y'know? I'm still waiting for Obsidian to get their high school dating sim out the door, anyway. They could even recycle some of the work done for Crucible, such as the atmosphere of uncertainty and dread. And the pouncing animations. RAWR

I can't wait to remilitarize your Rhineland!

Yeah, the campaign in RA3 often felt like a skirmish game, and unless the mission had very specific objectives, the allied AIs performed relatively well. Hopefully they will improve on that formula and allow the player to choose whether they want an annoying co-commander for the mission or not. And the Scrin were not bad as the enemy, but the playable campaign was total balls.

Lol, 40 reps on the bench @ 225 lbs is some pretty heavy ****. I don't think mkreku meant that as a serious rebuttal, though. It is the first (and second, and third...) result you get when you google for "fat football", after all. Chill.

Is that a mod? I dont remember weapon degrdation / breakage in any of the BG's. Due to the iron crisis in BG1, normal weapons have a chance of breaking in combat. There is a mod that gives the enemy a chance to have their weapons break as well. If you never experienced it yourself, you must have simply gotten lucky.

<pic> Dammit, where'd you get that pic?! I've lost a few pounds since then, I swear! proof

Looks ****ing awesome. Never played a MW game before, but I'm keeping an eye on this. Thanks for the heads up man!

Once you try Italian espresso, you'll never want to go back. For them brewing coffee is something of a ritual... and it shows.

You aren't big on sports, are you? -Boxing: two dudes beating the crap out of each other. -Golf: some guy trying to push a ball into a hole using a stick. -Weightlifting: fat bozos squatting and making funny faces. -Track & Field: running and jumping around and these guys don't even have a ball to kick! Really, give me any sport and I'll give you an inane simplification. Except Curling. Curling rules. Interestingly, pro football players are some of the best conditioned athletes overall, barring gymnasts. I guess that must be just for show.

For all intents and purposes, it is. Read Hades' original comment, and read my reply. Read it as many times as you need, understand what kind of minority Hades and I were talking about, and then get back to me. Because the Pope and Cardinals are, in themselves, a minority, silly! Whatever power they have over the Catholic Church is something even you can't seem to get straight. Further, being anti-gay is nowhere near being part of the WBC. Discrimination of any kind is against the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution (cue Enoch). You don't need legislation targeting specific segments of the population if you apply the law as it's written. In fact, you are creating further inequalities if you do. "Durr". Lol. Is that worse than a bunch of black kids beating a black kid to death, and how so? "Hate crimes" are bull****. You don't gangrape, torture and murder somebody out of love. Either make punishment harsher across the board, or don't bother. You are just arguing for further social division, as Gorth already pointed out. You are losing your touch chum.

fatty Perhaps. But can I dance or what?

Nope. You're the one trying to place everyone in the same camp. The burden of proof lies with you. And I guess you know this for the same reason you know that every Christian must be a Republican bigot. Okay. What does it have to do with what I said, anyway? How is that specifically pro-gay? And why should it be limited to gay people? Tsk tsk. Hate crime legislation IS positive discrimination. Sorry if you don't agree. You're right about DOMA, though. But, how is it linked with the alleged bigotry of Christians as opposed to Americans in general? We have gay marriage over here, and Catholics are a majority. *shrug*

Ah, well. I'll take that as a compliment. They are Christians. They are Republican. They are, according to you, anti-gay. Go on and establish the relationship between those conditions, past the purely anecdotal and incidental. Show us how being Christian makes you an anti-gay Republican. Show us how NOT being Christian makes you like gay people better. And as long as those groups you cited do nothing to quash the freedoms/rights whatever of the minorities they don't like, their opinions are just as valid as your own. You're just going to have to live with that. I already argued against the centralized character of the Catholic Church, btw. "pro-gay reforms", lol. Positive discrimination is still discrimination, m'kay?

Yep. I'm 3 alright!

NO U

I bow to your superior rhetoric, sir. I'm sure you leave all the girls gasping at the sheer wit of your sharp rebuttals. The thing is, I didn't - YOU assumed I had. I was commenting on your poorly supported opinion which, funny, is apparently now a "sarcastic riff". I do. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case with you and "sarcasm". I'm getting there, with your help.

Oh, goodie! Another e-pissing contest. It's been too long since any FO3-related thread turned into one. Aren't you? Wow, then what are you posting replies to what others say for? If not debating, what are you doing, the dishes? What question is that, the one about me making assumptions based on some picture you posted in a different thread, or the one about me being 3? Heh, do you really think either of those warrant an answer? I couldn't care less what you look like bub. In fact, I hadn't thought of that pic until now. You could be a German Shepherd for all I care. Chances are you'd put up more of a fight, too. But here you go, a pic of mine, just so we are on even footing. Feel free to assume what you will. The ones you haven't made regarding your statement that "FO3 is inherently inferior in every department". I suggest you familiarise yourself with the meaning of the words you throw around to look important. Yeah, after all, it's just so much effort to express the reasons behind one's bull****. And certainly, we SHOULD know by now what those reasons are. It's none other than TwinkieGorilla we're talking about, here! And then some.

Even better. I've seen your arguments. Well, more like, your lack thereof. And this 3 year old just beat you at debate. Lol, owned.

You seem to have no idea what I'm talking about. And what's worse, you have no idea what you are talking about. A very vocal, very small minority does not warrant comments in the vein of those you made. That accounts for Mr. Phelps and other idiots. The Catholic Church or, more accurately, the bunch of idiots who sit in their halls in the Vatican spouting off nonsense are a disgrace. They are, however, a minority as well, and do not operate or conduct themselves the same way your average neigbourhood Padre does. Those people are usually kind, hard-working folk that are involved with the community and an example of tolerance. I suggest you look up the meaning of that word. But the bottom line is that for you it's easier to take the manichaean route and put everyone in the same camp with Phelps. So go on, show me proof that "Christians", or any other random group you feel like hating on today are "evil". You can't, and you'll go "but I don't need to prove anything to you", or some other similarly lame excuse. Same old, same old.