213374U

^ I wonder why. But yeah, it would be cool if they got around to getting the different class-based titles working. And enabled the BBCode for flash embedding too, while they are at it...

I thought you were older.

Sure, because it supports your POV. It's bad form to post a review of a book having read only a portion. It's disrespectful toward the author... and it shows contempt toward the reviewer's work and readers. I'm neither agreeing nor disagreeing with the content of the review itself as I haven't read the book myself. But understand that I'm not going to take Pickrel's (or your own) word for it. One is deliberately incomplete (and conveniently, it's not the first time I see it used to attack her) and the other is, quite obviously, heavily biased. Further, you aren't being honest - you are using the alleged poor quality of Atlas Shrugged (as a novel!) as a means to attack Rand and, by extension, objectivism. Her worth as a novelist and her worth as a philosopher are separate things. Have you read "Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology"? Do enlighten us!

I think you are mistaking "good" for "lazy".

I don't go to pubs, so no worries there.

Hahaha, oh man. You really are a pop stalinist.

That would be the gist of it, yes.

Schizoid, rather.

Second link is dead, likely deleted.

Yeah, because growing up is such a great thing...

My bad. Did I say Ayn Rand? I meant Todd Howard: You know you want to.

Now, now. Don't be jealous. If you ask nicely enough, maybe HK would make one for you with that, um, thing! Or you could use the Ayn Rand one.

Oh, I get it now! So fans get to say what's canon and what isn't, based on their personal tastes.

Aw, snap!

Get off our thread, then, you partycrasher!

Shouldn't you take your own advice to heart? Shouldn't you post something other than useless fluff for a change? I made my argument, er, in the same post you quoted, and in the one before that.

So what? Is FO2 any less canon than the first? Is it any less of a setting-establishing resource? Arguments please, not the same old rehashed excuses.

Marry me, HK!

I'm sure you could give him a few pointers on how to run it. Um, sure. After all, it's not like stuff like the Keeng Rat and his bro are in the game IC, at all. Neither is that odd guy Horrigan, either. Or talking plants. Or huge, mutated, spectacle-wearing chessmaster scorpions. Or S&M-loving supermutants. Or scien... err, I mean, hubologists. No sir, thankfully, you can avoid all of that - it's easy as uninstalling the game! Sure, Bethy may be going overboard with a DLC revolving around the silliness present in the setting... but it's not really out of place, all things considered.

Shut up. Anything with the Batmobile in it is awesome. Ergo, he won the thread.

Brace for drama.

Yeah, the Astral Blade is pretty neat at those levels. Not many mobs get resistance to sonic damage. Why did you choose longswords, though? Isn't the Silver Sword a scimitar? i have no idea - i only just started playing i haven't gone for any weapon focuses so far, so maybe i will go for scimitars after all Oh ****. I've made a boor of myself yet again. Sorry about that, I ASSumed you had already played the game. Forget I said anything.

Yeah, the Astral Blade is pretty neat at those levels. Not many mobs get resistance to sonic damage. Why did you choose longswords, though? Isn't the Silver Sword a scimitar? -- I'm playing NWN2 myself, too. I went with a modified version of the WM suggested by Gromnir and he's kicking butt scary - despite my best efforts to gimp the build. But now I'm thinking it would be fun to try perhaps a rogue/wizard and go for arcane trickster (Spell Fixes allows for sneak attack on ranged touch attacks, tee hee). Is it odd that I find playing with the character generator more fun at times than playing the game proper?

Yeah, I agree. Taks has been too quiet lately.