213374U

Yeah, but defenestrating random mercs makes up for that, big time.

I don't mind the tattoo, but that face spells "wide-eyed innocence" to me, in ALLCAPS. Cute, though. One day, I'll get around to posting my femShep. That day, you will know fear.

If the internets didn't have Google, I'd agree. But you want to force-edit people's posts, to make the boards potentially more understandable to hypothetical newbies that may or may not have basic reading comprehension skills necessary to interpret context AND for whom asking what the **** does X mean is too much effort. So, sorry old boy, but I don't like it. There are better things to add to the boards, such as flash/YouTubes embed support in posts, a spellchecker, class-level dependent titles that work, PS3 gamertags, user blogs, etc. And if it ends up being added, it should be toggleable, to minimize possible inconvenience.

Why not? It's not like you are funding development. Just wait until people whose criteria you respect play the game, then make a decision. What's the worst that can happen, a game that you have no interest in? I really don't understand this cult title consecration thing. edit: oh, right. It's another Krezack post sponsored by Absolut.

The story progresses very little indeed. ME2 focuses on environments, organizations and characters. Most of the time and work in ME2 is spent either on recruiting people or fixing their personal problems. In contrast, in ME1 you recruited everyone in "act I", except for Liara, and spent most of the game saving the world. I can't say I have a problem with this setup, as some recruitment missions are really good -- or maybe it's just the music direction that makes everything so much better. But... just what do they need so many characters for?

It's made out of people.

I thought you ALREADY were a PhD. I feel cheated. ;C

Is this in relation to that .45 ACP construction appliance you posted in the other thread?

Source? http://www.pcguru.hu/pcguru/hirek/a-biowar...ss-effect-3-ban Yes, err... thanks. Also: J

Which is false, and I'm going by the links you provided: The problem lies with processed meats and saturated fats. So, go with lean meat. That's about as fair as reducing a vegetarian diet to soybean and lentils. The "optimal healthy amount" varies wildly, if we are talking about lean meat. I'm on a strength gain diet, and not being very fond of supplements, I need all the natural protein I can get -- >100g per day. So, my "optimal healthy amount" can be more than what you suggest, as long as I'm not eating red meat to the exclusion of other protein sources. I also consume white meat, fish, seeds and plenty of vegetables and fruit. And I'm both more fit and healthier than some health nazis I know. Oh, almost forgot. I'm also much less stressed about this... We're just talking man. Nobody is flinging poo (yet). Live and let live, as far as I'm concerned...

Source?

Dogmeat's crazy HPs was a bug with the scaling system, IIRC. So, the best thing about Broken Steel is actually... a bug.

After spending more than I'd like to admit replacing doors, keyboard and mouse sets, tennis racqets, a PC screen and a motherboard, a Game Boy and probably more stuff I'm forgetting, I recommend taking deep breaths instead. Not quite as satisfying perhaps, but significantly cheaper.

While I understand your ethical reasons for being a veg, what I don't understand are your reasons for painting red meat as inherently unhealthy. Any diet based solely on one kind of food can't be very healthy... but that doesn't mean that food is bad by itself. I mean, if you are so convinced of the advantages of your lifestyle, why misrepresent the alternatives?

Right, right. Life is a chronic disease with a very bad prognosis. The solution is obviously becoming a diet nazi...

Interesting. Now, let me tell you about these runaway MG3s we used to keep clean as a whistle...

Can't help you with that mate. So... lower your expectations? That works well in other areas of life, where the alternative isn't really an option...

Indeed. These uneducated plebs, how dare they! Oh, the nerve! *sniffs tobacco* Not perfect, but at least consistently good -- from what I've seen, their aiming isn't affected by difficulty, unlike the enemy's. The AR accuracy upgrade deals with the dispersion present in rifles. That means that squaddies using the Vindicator wouldn't see much of an improvement, but if you have any using the Avenger, they'd work better. And interestingly, her loyalty mission is one of only two where a disagreement with Shep (as opposed to simple incompetence) can result in him not earning that character's loyalty. Infatuation/admiration? You bet. Worship? Not so much. The other character that displays this unthinkable independence is... Zaeed.

Keep trying buddy. I'm not going to cater to your immensurable attention need by discussing it anymore, though.

DO NOT WANT

It's called "style over substance", technically. With some PC thrown in for flavor. Also: hey Hades, having fun with your new alt?

HA! And people thought FemShep got the shaft in ME1...

These people don't read very many YouTube comments, I'm guessing.

Great. Talk about forums on the forums. And now I'm talking on the forums about the forums talk on the forums. Oh, shi-

Obviously GT doesn't like you southern hemisphere types. The trailer looks pretty cool. Borderlands-esque gameplay?