Technically the MVP should be a player that drastically changes the win totals of an organization. So a mediocre team with one superstar that manages to post a decent record should be the ideal MVP candidate.
So Lebron should have stayed in Cleveland
I'd be cool if they took Bernard Cornwell's Authurian twist when writing the story. As is, it will probably be a lighter, action version of the legend with Ritchie at the helm.
For me, Spec Ops: The Line was a good looking game that told an interesting story. But in general I dislike FPS gameplay, so it didn't seem better or worse than anything else out there.
I don't know how you could possibly pledge a kickstarter game and honestly believe it will finish on time. It would have to be a project that is near completion. There are just too many circumstances involved to really put faith in the arbitrary dates they put on those things.
Hah, I remember being in college without internet access and having to go to the library to look up the locations of the trainers in the previous M&M games.
South Park has always been a piece of social commentary. Like since episode one. Everything Trey Parker and Matt Stone has some sort of lesson underneath the humor.
I can't even name a player on the Pacers
Obviously the season is not over yet, but it just seems hasty to label anyone MVP without looking at the whole season.
Earlier I was having trouble beating the Earth Elemental, so I went back to the mainland, touched the earth crystal that boosts my stats, and headed back to the fight. I love this game.
Everyone here agrees that Lebron is the most amazing player in the NBA, but if another player has better stats and propels his team to a better record for one year, why shouldn't he be considered for the MVP award?
If stats don't matter, why bother playing the games at all? Why not just give Lebron the MVP because he is the most physically talented player? Why not just give the Heat the championship because they have the most talented lineup?