Sarex

The muliplauyer is ok, as far as I heard. The main issues with the game is no unit stacking and the AI. Though I play CIV more like a building game, like Caesar and Pharaoh. Man someone should kickstart a game like those, so much fun.

What annoyed me is that you can auto win the game on any difficulty if you ally your self with all the city states, which is really not that hard.

Told you. I'm still reserving my judgment until I watch part 4. Maybe they got something planned and it will make sense in the end. Though there are pretty interesting theories that it was all foreshadowed in the original series and that in fact these 4 movies are a sequel.

Heh, if you think that is war, well I have bad news for you. It's seems that you and I are not on the same page scale wise.

I think you are mistaking assembly for manufacturing. As for military production yes they have facilities but do they have the numbers for mass producing to supplement war losses, that is what I doubt.

Harem route incoming.

Heh, we go head on head and butt on butt, we like to use the whole egg.

Then let us not look at the blown up balloon that is the US economy and look at who really produces what? The fact is that the US has moved almost all of it's production overseas and is only just now beginning to show interest in moving it all back. The numbers you guys look up on wiki have so little to do with reality that it would almost be laughable, if more then half of the world wasn't dependent on that dollar. The US has built it's whole economy on the fact that they made sure that no one would call bull**** on it or they would bring down their own economy with it. I mean look at the Chinese even though they have money to burn, most of their federal reserves are in dollars so they don't dare do anything that would jeopardize that dollar. But, and this is a big but, if world war broke out that dollar would not be worth more then the paper it was printed on and all that mattered would be what resources you have and what are your production capabilities. I don't think that the US would have capabilities for mass producing tanks and other weapons for years if all out war broke out. Their saving grace is that while their mass production capabilities are not really there, they do have massive stockpiles of weapons. But then the problem there is that most of those weapons are old. Which brings us back to, you can't win a war without boots on the ground.

I don't think it's even that. When the republicans do something that is recognized as a bad idea and dirties their image, they switch out for democrats, who will essentially do everything that matters the same and once they **** up well people have already forgotten what the republicans did so it time to pick them again.. It is such a farce, but hey while gays get married and pot becomes legal everyone is happy, because that is all that matters. That is why I think that democracy is essentially a flawed system, people on average are stupid and it's oh so easy to pull wool over their eyes.

But then again there is not, production and R&D is much, much cheaper in Russia and resources are much more plentiful, it's not always down to economy. But there were still boots on the ground, just not theirs.

Posted a link to the paper a few days back in the Ukraine thread. As I said the paper paints a pretty picture, looking forward to it being finished.

The next great war like any other will be resolved by the boots on the ground, like all the wars before it. I think you bought too much in to the American war propaganda or Discovery shows as they are called. You simply cannot win a war from the air. That has been shown time and time again in the 21st century wars conflicts. Also you presume too much about the capabilities of either Russia or the US, people here seem to think that the whole war capabilities of a country can be found out on the internet. That is either precious or stupid, I can't decide yet.

For me it's not about religion, I don't subscribe to any religion, it's about being with your family and having some fun.

Or when someone holds the egg towards the top while squeezing it. Or the undercover wood egg, lost such a good egg one year to a wooden one, I had my revenge though...

Looks like, I never really though about it until now, hence the topic.

Well candy is good too and hey it's never too late to start. XD

I have been wondering do you have egg battles in your country for Easter and if not what are your traditions.

The problem is that without the east, the west is screwed. All the production in Ukraine is in the East, so then West Ukraine would depend on the EU for survival for years to come. I think that ultimately the east would be better off without the west, but that won't happen willingly.

I loved Dishonored, the setting and story were great and I enjoyed the gameplay, even if it was on the easier side.

Serbia here, pretty much the same.

We should start watching Putin closely in next few days, if he starts growing a mustache we are in trouble.

And if you want proof, all you have to do is read the recently declassified Clinton documents.

In Dark Souls when you revive the enemies respawn thus you can just farm them for souls (xp), in IE games you have a finite number of enemies and thus XP. So no I would say it's not the same. Especially in the IWD series. As for learning the AI, well in Dark Souls that consists of either timing the counter attacks or knowing at what time to roll and at what time to attack, while in IE games ,I dare say, you had more stuff to learn.

Dark Souls is an action rpg, and there is no "gameover" in Dark Souls, you just spam encounters until you grind enough souls to be strong enough to pass the boss with your skill, or until you learn the pattern of the AI.

So you were born in 13th century England, then? What's your secret, Pilates? Think for just a second of what you really know about the snubby twats you are lambasting with such gleeful abandon—their life experiences, their backgrounds, their activities and involvements. Whatever mental image you have of "them", you might as well substitute it with a ****ing talking oven, because that's about as close as you are going to get at an accurate depiction. And hey, at least you'll get a chuckle each time you think of "them". P.S. No, really. What's your secret? I think she was trolling them, not 100% sure so don't take my word on it.