Chilloutman

idealist or imperialist?

I am usually driving short distances - diesel engines need to heat up and they got damaged if they are used a lot in cold state

As much as I would like to get Jeep they are pretty expensive in EU - especially spare parts and maintenance so I think I have to skip them. Looking on into Subaru Foresters - they seem to be reasonable but it seems they got quite weak engines so I am still not sure

BMW SUV sux, its expensive, its terrible off-road, is high maintenance - same as Audi. Those not gonna cut it

Sorry bro, no-way I am going to get Dacia xD. New Volvo is kinda CEO, but 5 years old have decent price tag around 13K-15K EUR. Thats my 10K-14K EUR is my target

Hi Guys, So I am slowly looking for new car. If you got any suggestions I would welcome them. I am from EU so US guys your view will be welcome as well but.. well you don't know much about EU cars What I am looking for: Probably SUV or similar. I am driving mostly on suburbs but I need car which can go off road from time to time and have enough space (I am going fishing). It needs to be reliable, low maintenance car with good durability (corrosion proof etc.) and also note that I will get used car as I don't have cash for new one so ideally some which have good reputation for used cars. I don't want diesel either and I dont want less than 2000 ccm because than cas is slow or more that 3.5 ccm because insurance is than too expensive (and consumption as well) Currently on my radar is Volvo xc90 with 3.4 petrol engine from 2012-14 - its quite expensive and i heard that off road capabilities are not great and 3.4 engine is bad as well so still on fence. Another option was Hilux but they are more an offroad car all in all than SUV Anyway thanks to all who share your views, Chilloutman

What I am missing, not sure what this is related to at all

Ha, I like how True Russian style is driving around in German cars xD

war of modders! Fight! Fight! Fight!

OK thanks, it boils down to when character can counterattack, I dont know why I think I read somewhere on internets that you can only counter attack after successful dodge for some reason

You get a counterattack if you have enough red points left over to perform the attack. So normally if your opponent has not used any combat ability yet, and have full, let's say 4 points and are armed with a single one-handed weapon that costs 2 per attack, they will counterattack twice, regardless of whether you hit or they dodge. There are things that reduce the cost of counterattacks: a successful parry for example reduces the cost by 1. So the same enemy armed with a sword (or any melee weapon and a shield) would still get two counterattacks, but if in parry stance, the first counterattack would have only cost 1 point. With Web of Steel, allowing two parry attempts, they could get 3 counterattacks out of those 4 points. The idea behind Frenzy is (if I remember correctly) that you say "Yes, you get to hit me back, but I'll make sure I hit you and hit you harder." If it removes dodge, and your opponent has a high dodge chance of 100+, giving them the opportunity to hit back can be a small cost to pay. Especially if you play a high Melee Resist / Armor Absorb tank, who is either hard to hit or takes little damage when hit. Or if you have such a great crit build that you have a good chance to stun the opponent on the first blow anyway. edit: Practical example: You attack my old level 10 dodge tank Augur. She has a dodge chance around 120% and of course mastered Sidestep for 3 dodge chances a turn. If your warrior has 3 attacks, she has a 95% chance to dodge each of them, as even with dodge bypass for daggers etc, you are unlikely to get her below the critical failure threshold. She has already attacked you on her turn, so she has no counter-attacks, but you aren't going to do anything during your turn other than try to burn through her dodges, so another of your warriors can get a chance to hit her. Now let's say you attack her with Frenzy. You negate her dodges, but as a trade in, for each of your three attacks, she will get a chance to hit you back, even though she is out of Offensive Points. Of course in the first scenario you could simply choose not to hit her on your turn and save your offensive points for counterattacks yourself. But as a dodge tank she is most likely not meant to kill you. She is just there to tie down your heavy hitter, while the rest of her warband put the hurt on your guys. This gets even worse if the dodge character has abilities they can use that do not provoke a counterattack. A spellcaster who only needs to risk one low chance Curse/Wrath to be useful, while still tying you down for example. I had a Sisters Novice tank a Daemonette for about 7 turns with her silly high dodge chance, while my Augur has tanked Impressives. Neither ever kill the opponents they tank, but that is the Sister Superior's job. Ok so I dont have to dodge or parry to get counter attack, I only need some leftover 'attack' action points? anyway still dont understand that 'you perform counterattack on every oportunity'. I am currently having this ability on my chaos marauder just for damage buff, but I was thinking I can somehow get him more counterattacks but without dodge stance it seems quite unlikely. edit after your edit: oh, so it means that ENEMIES have counter attack against me even if they dont have left points when I attack them with frenzy? well that kinda sux edit edit: I think you got it wrong, it disable stances for character under effect of frenzy - not opponents

I seen some people playing Mordheim here, guys I got question. Skill frenzy have in description that it allows counter attack on every opportunity but disable dodge stances. AFAIK you get counter attack after successfull dodge. So what I am missing?

dont know if anyone already posted it, you guys are debating to fast to follow

only 'super hero movies' I liked was Blade and new Dredd. I would like maybe new Spawn. But again I am not fan of comics either

I can't read that, what is written in it?

Agree except for that girls stuff, me gusta

Like Saudi Arabia have links to Clintons?

Fixed that for you

Satan

well there were some hidden stashes here and there, but I liked it very much

Strongly disagree, world in Gothic 1 make so much more sense than Skyrim or Oblivion Was it any less of wildlife extermination game than later PB titles? That and tripping over minor loot every other step didn't help Gothic believability. I am not saying it doesnt have some issues, however overall, it was much more 'alive' and believable than whole 'continents' presented to us in latest Elders scroll games

Strongly disagree, world in Gothic 1 make so much more sense than Skyrim or Oblivion

Is there some modded filter which would tone down that cartoon color pallet from it already? It looks like Warcraft :/

someone leaked Warcraft adventure carefull I dont know if rar doesnt contain viruses - on your own risk, so far some people noted that game works on Win 10 - not sure if its complete http://www.mediafire.com/download/gfdan9gqz5xfyg8/Warcraft+Adventures+-+Lord+of+the+CLans.rar Cheers

Nope. Surnames originated in nicknames (and vulgar versions of names) and professions belongs to common people. So same as everywhere else, but for some reason in Russian, all of them were noble houses, war leaders, or rich traders