Chilloutman

Well, its nature of politics, it seems far away, but is actually quite personal

I dunno mate, tests I seen were more focused on logical thinking which doesn't mean 'acquiring knowledge' - its more a memory thing. IQ should be using this knowledge correctly It's been a while since I took one but I remember quite a few questions that would have required a more-than-basic understanding of math & language Well, not these I remember, if you don't count numerical series for example. More of tests were pictograms and such

I dunno mate, tests I seen were more focused on logical thinking which doesn't mean 'acquiring knowledge' - its more a memory thing. IQ should be using this knowledge correctly. Reading a book (and remembering it) is acquiring knowledge. You can read whole math book and remember it, it doesn't mean you know math

I hope this is not aimed at me, I am trying to avoid it as much as I can

not that I suggest that these low numbers are correct, but people are often subject to their own environment, you would be supprised how stupid some people can be on larger scale in their community. Just look at some English hooligans for example

You guys still trying to argue with Bruce? He is troll for sure, you all should know by now. Don't you see how even cool headed members of forum start to be aggressive with him? Trolls work at its best

And how so exactly? He put down his helmet, it will be obviously oral abuse, he will be reading poems to her

didnt get that as well

That is the point fool

Extreme nationalism is in rise and in past it has had habit to create conflicts between nations. Yeah, but strangely now its more 'European' nationalism against EU than lets say France nationalism, everyone want to keep europe togather but still keep own identity which somehow EU completely dont understand. There is no notion that one nation is better than other (at least from east europe perspective)

I dont know mate, I dont fear EU army, I fear EU politicians

He's the favourite to kill Cersei. But he's not going to join Jon- or Dany for that matter- and if he does the shark has not just been jumped, it's been hopped and skipped too. Leaving aside that he's a Lannister, had his demon spawn on the throne and had been boffing his sister he attacked Ned, killed lots of northmen and chucked Bran out a window, and murdered (ok, 'murdered') Dany's father. Fan favouritism seems to bestow magical powers in TV land, but not that magical. Jaime's endgame is either death or (my favoured bet) Nightswatch, possibly as LC. Latter would certainly have the required Dramatic Irony. Yeah Jamie in Nightwatch is what I meant by joining Jon. At this point everyone killed someone in someones family. What bothers me more is that noone told Jon or Sansa that it was Little Finger who actually 'killed' old Stark. If I recall it was not that secret

All who would confirm are dead though, those who can and are alive won't. He doesnt have to be confirmed as King on Iron Throne, but he still is last Baratheon, so he can be used as ally

Technically, the Vale is still standing even if being manipulated by Littlefinger. Otherwise I agree. I wonder if Dany will start in the south and move north meet a northern army at the neck, and they kneel. Similar to Aegon the Conqueror. Also, the marriage conversation between Dany and Tyrion has to be some foreshadowing. The Kingdom isn't ripe for young males of noble birth to wed a Queen. Theon's out, Euron would go against the deal made with Theon and Yara, given Gendry's status as I posted about means he is an unlikely possibility, and that's about it. Dorne has no sons, Tyrell's are all gone, Jaime isn't likely, sweet Robin LOL, and we are about dry. That leaves Jon Snow. Targ's sibling marriages are mentioned a great deal in the books, and I think a few times on the show... So I can't discount it that "happy ending" fans may get their wish. Gendry have same status as Jon now soo.. he is still posibility

Can't Tyrion kill her?

I half expect him to shove a sword into her back to save people from her wrath (like he did with the Mad King). Making him a double "king"slayer, a kinslayer, and bringing closure to that relationship. It would bring him full circle. I dont think he will kill her, it would be too much for him, but maybe he will join night watch or something

man, chillout, wishing someone dead is a little bit too much

I am now interested if Jamie finally realise his sister is mad b*tch and turn back on her, maybe join Jon

i was satisfied with last episode (excluding that fast travel system). Fingers crossed Sansa will not make everything worse

Yes this is true, for some reason Scotland has always been very ungrateful IMO to what England has done for them To be part of the UK should be celebrated yet many Scottish people resent the UK, you almost want to tell Scotland " fine leave the UK " but Scotland is very relevant and important contributor towards the UK so we want them to stay Same like South Africa right? xD

Ah yeah, DA:I needs that stupid EA client right? :/

Its hardly unexpected, when we adopted decimalisation we were promised that prices would not rise, of course they did. When North Sea oil was discovered we were promised the lowest petrol prices in Europe, they became some of the highest. We pay our Road Tax to travel on highways that ruin our cars due to their almost non existent level of maintenance. Nobody really expected the politicians to do what they said, or be able to, these are the usual lies we all expect and no one really takes Farage seriously, he is merely the recipient of protest votes. With his erstwhile objective achieved I wouldn't be surprised to see him and his diminish remarkably swiftly. I have to admit that i'm loving the bitterness displayed by the Remain camp, so many predictions of a resounding victory and the impossibility of the Leave vote triumphing has turned almost all of them into seething bodies of hatred. The villainiation and demonisation of the Leave camp has already started. Its strange how isolated and insulated the capital was from the prevailing mood in the majority of the country, anyone with roots in England outside London could tell that the Leave camp was not to be dismissed. Well, maybe its because in London is actually lowest percentage of native brits than as opposed in countryside? Like seriously, when I was last time there It was kind of small asia

Well its that strange notion that after WWII and what Hitler did no one is allowed to be nationalist - because Hitler. Strange that noone have problem with socialists because Stalin Maybe because Stalin was not socialist And Wilders is not Nazi Wilders is not a Nazi, but like the rest of his ilk what he most certainly is, is a lying populist charlatan, offering no solutions but only lies about how he is going to "fix" everything - when in fact he hasn't got a clue. And in the meanwhile, he's willing to lie about anything else as long as it means he can draw attention to his one single issue. Case in point, one of Wilders' promises during election time was that he would stop the rising of the pension age (from 65 tot 67) that the then government had planned. Then after the elections, he has his party vote FOR the rising of the pension age because he could make a deal with other parties about immigration. In fact, I think most of you right wingers who like him so much should take a look at his party program sometimes. Wilders' started out right wing (for Dutch standards) but these days in most things the party program is so left wing they mostly resemble the Socialist Party. With the difference of course that it's all based on "giving welfare back the Dutch, because foreigners". Not that he really cares about any of these things, because he's quite ready to promise anything as long as it gets him votes. But it's okay, the sort of people who vote for him are like sheep, that forget all about the broken promises again next election, and then again it will be the mantra "If we vote Wilders in power, he'll fix everything, because don't you know, he's the feckin' messiah". So yeah, when it comes to Hitler, that's what he has in common. 1) most politicians are populists, thats nothing new 2) I am not rightist, I am more at center I am kind of libertarian 3) everyone is voting like as sheep, thats point of voting, if you want to be wolf became politician 4) In parlament democracy everyone is making deals (if you dont have more than 50% of votest ofc), thats why you will never get fully fullfilled party program - but politicians needs to adhere to their core ideas

Well its that strange notion that after WWII and what Hitler did no one is allowed to be nationalist - because Hitler. Strange that noone have problem with socialists because Stalin Maybe because Stalin was not socialist And Wilders is not Nazi

Well its that strange notion that after WWII and what Hitler did no one is allowed to be nationalist - because Hitler. Strange that noone have problem with socialists because Stalin