Chilloutman

well it says something about Hillary than as well...

yeah can someone confirm what is in this video? I didn't watched closely on that hearing but from what is in that video Trump is actually pretty clean?

If you like here are few tips for start: 1. minerals are king at beginning 2. use your minerals to build space stations for more minerals 3. use science ship to explore systems in your border range first, than colonisable planets 4. split your fleet and use only single corvet for exploration - that way you will not loose all of them to monsters 5. build buildings only on tiles where you have population, building without population don't produce anything but still cost energy 6. try to hijack systems with good planets using frontier outposts from AI

cmon, lets just do multiplayer Stellaris already

Given the title, I feel forced to confess to not actually being an expert on Cheech and Chong films. HERESY!

yes I think there is indeed pilot skill, also maybe you can do that if you select only one weapon to do so which does not have spread damage inherit?

SL - small laser ML - medium laser LL - Large laser Lasers are precise (hit only particular part of mech) but generate a lot of heat er - extanded range SRM - short range missile MRM - medium range missile LRM - Long range missile missiles have decent damage which is spread on all parts of the mech (depending on angle) and generate medium amount of heat number behind missile name explain how much missiles will be shot in one volley (EG. srm2 will shoot 2 rockets in one shoot and srm6 will shot 6) AC - autocannon AC - precise, good damage, low heat but limited ammo number behind AC is caliber - larger do more damage but have shorter range and higher heat generation PPC - particle pulse? cannon - good range, good damage but its spread around more mech parts and high heat generation) HS - heat sink (more heat sinks mean better handling heat generated from weapons)

I am not here to convince you guys about anything. Can we agree at least on these: 1. laws of country should be followed if they are not un-democratic/anti-freedom 2. Dublin agreement is not followed by south states of EU 3. a lot of 'refugees' are coming from states which have large population of people who support killing heretics/gays/jews .. you name it 4. a lot of these 'refugees' is hard to identify due to lack of any reliable documents Is this statement true or not? if we can't agree on this this discussion is pointless from start...

what claim?

well to be fair, how you want to do such research? I doubt most muslims would confess that they want to kill all Jews when are already in EU so unless you want to gather them and get them all take lie detector test you will never know. But those studies done outside of EU should be quite reliable? I think one was flying around here...

well its mix of humanism and christian values, sometimes they are hand in hand, sometimes they are not. But saying that all laws should be based solely on humanism is pretty extreme as well, don't you think? We are getting into shady parts of morality and ethics. We should focus on facts which are implemented laws.

I don't know man, sleeping with someone's wife is a sin, but its not in the law of a country, so its clear that not all Commandment are laws...

I have no problem with people believing their opinion is fact, as I have stated - I have a problem with people giving me links to very clearly biased news sites and saying that it's sufficient to prove their claim. I don't posts links to the Guardian or Breibart as proof, because it most certainly isn't. I cite researchers, books written on the subject or actual papers published. And as I said, half the links he provided elaborated on completely different points that the headline of the article, often meant to be clickbait - if I spend a few minutes actually reading his sources and find multiple errors and inconsistencies, then that puts the entire argument into doubt, no matter how valid the concern. The only factual link he provided that provided data and detailed how they reached their conclusion, almost outright contradicted him... So he's even undermining his own points. I mean - is that the standard we're upholding here? As for Polish conservatives and Christian morality "Regarding morality, I think that law depends on an axiology. There is a positivist attitude that ethics comes from law, that is is, as it were, prior ... that parliament is the root of morality. I do not share this opinion. For me the root of morality is God" - grzeskowiak The Struggle for Constitutionalism in Poland - Chatper: Christian morality in polish law page 198. by M. Brzezinski Interviews with Polish conservatives regarding morality and law. I am not going to dispute that Polish conservatives are heavy on Christianity, but Poland is not whole EU

Well still waiting for you to back your claims, but sure give me an hour - also I see you don't disagree with my critizism, just the fact that you were critizised. Very telling any debate should be baded on facts, which requires source sceptisicm. I demand nothing less from you. If you however want in depth analysis, provide me with quality sources and not quantity crap. 1 billion flies are still sitting on **** not to pick sides, but you often provide link and consider it fact, what sharp is doing is showing you the other side?

I have played that on PC - was really far in it and then game bugged on me and I was never been able to finish it

deus vult ave maria? God wants greet Maria? What is this supposed to tell me, that polish people can't speak Latin? you should rather consider if you don't have dyslexia

kp brought up Mummy in the genesis post. with the new universal monster movies being released, we cannot help but lament the metaphorical death o' the traditional mummy. no longer is the mummy a revenant punishing those who defile a tomb, but is a demigod/god with apocalyptic intent. blame the brendan fraser rachel weisz films? to keep this political, we can throw out a more sinister (ridiculous) possibility. given the middle-eastern origin o' the mummy, is the transformation from a singular and limited threat to a danger directed at western culture entire represent transparent and insidious islamophobia on the part o' the movie producers? muahaha. c'mon. you has seen crazier stuff from breitbart, no? HA! Good Fun! I can't unseen that parallel now...

not like all of this s already law in EU... but then you have multicultural and humanist policies and politics pushing against it. I am pretty sure we have much more separated christian church from state than US

I am not sure where you guys all are from but please try to understand that US does have huge advantage when dealing with muslim minority because of extremely strict visa policies. Most muslims in US are the top of muslim population, meanwhile in EU its completely different story...

yeah, radical blow himself up - lets ban internetz. classic

I hate radicalized buses

hmm so I may finally buy NV

0.7 Czech rep, 18th lowest in the world