Chilloutman

I really don't remember that escape part, cant you just right click somewhere to close it or something?

I am on same boat then

you mean skinks?

Yeah Bush - started war based on false info about weapons of mass destruction Obama - won Nobel prize without even doing anything yet, used directives more often than WC, supported terrorist during Arab spring Clinton - started war in Iraq Trump - he is mean, muh huh - worst president ewa

YES FINALLY MY FAVOURITE FACTION GOING IN

butthurt much? xD

Red, trust me there are several important lessons I have learnt about how to have a healthy, positive and sustainable lifestyle If you a politician you cannot make the media your enemy for no reasonable reason. He was criticizing the media back in the days when he needed to win the Republican presidential candidacy, it was unprecedented and as I said he has absolutely made enemies of numerous media institutions He was under the mistaken impression that a man can be greater than the global media, its not likely. Anyone in the public limelight can have a good and respectful relationship with the media, the onus is on them as the media is generally not hard to understand or rationalize well he pissed on all main media and still won election, I would consider it win.

well I thought Trump folks were anti establishment, they were not necessary republicans?

Really? And tou know this based on your intimate relation with the guy? He is an antitrumper and will jump on any straw that he can get to attack a guy who was actually able to win election. McCain is also a smart politician. He's not going to stick his neck out against his party leader unless he has verified the information. You know, many reasonable people will check their sources before they speak out against something that may bite them in the arse. Like Clinton?

still doesn't say what he shared

if it would be code worded it would be kinda useless for them no?

Good grief, that information was important for saving human life, he told them about terrorists willing to shoot down their airplanes. Its not like he gave them codes to nukes. That source was probably someone from rebe faction who is probably same or worse as Assad anyway. ffs you are using big words with little meaning

still don't see issue, as you stated he didn't compromised methods or source, just revealed their finding and I actually think he have that right? seems like beating a dead horse. And from purely humanitarian PoV it seems like he tried to save lives even if these might be russian lives and he made friendly gesture towards Russia without loosing any valuable asset or lessen his own possition of power. Haters gonna hate I suppose

so HE does not denied anything if I reading it correctly

Not that I want to protect him but.. what is he denial in that tweets?

Interesting power the DNC has as opposed to the US government. Wikileaks sources usually get everyone wanting them dead (Manning for example, and hey they sort of got close). yeah, where is Assagne now is also still unsolved mystery

Also it may play in that Russia is ally with Syrians (Syrian government) that USA and even Trump generally counts to be bad guys, so there is always question what intel you can give to state that fights against your agenda in the region that intel is about. its just charade for public at this point, everyone knows that Assad is going to stay as there is no other reasonable option. He is only secular option and everyone knows it and no-one can afford another fundamentalist government in that area. US will not say it publicly but support to rebels is going to end, only Kurds might still be supported depending on talks with Erdogan.

So what is that big fuss, he told Russia who/were the badies are in Syria and its wrong why? Its seems like big win for USA as they don't have to get their hands dirty while russians just don't give a f*ck and will just murderkill them

I am sorry but what did he shared with Russia? Sounds like some info about terrorists? That doesn't sound bad at all?

Say Terrance, if Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel are on a sinking ship in the middle of the ocean, who survives? I don't know Philipp, who? EUROPE!

Heroes of Might and Magic.... Settlers and more than a few others For ruined franchises? Not really fair, no other large publisher would touch that type of game or something like Might & Magic X with a barge pole, with a few exceptions (eg 2k and XCOM). But then other niche Ubi titles like the Anno series haven't been mentioned on their balance ledger either. As for Paradox, people have short memories. Their history is of dreadfully optimised published games usually with dreadful bugs which are then dreadfully supported, plus more than occasional fallings out with their sub developers and some truly Bethesda level shenanigans. Their record recently has been better, but frankly it could scarcely have been worse, and they still have... problems. War of the Roses? Their dlc policy? Either would have got a roasting were it EA or Actiblizz doing it. PoE and Cities are successes, sure, much as Magicka was back in the day, but that alone doesn't make them 'nice' publishers. They tend to get a pass because their core games have a high fanboy density- not undeservedly, their internally developed games have nearly all been quality, albeit sometimes delayed quality- and they strive to maintain a reputation as an underdog. But... Gettysburg: Armored Warfare? SOTS2 release fiasco? Stealing the title Achtung Panzer, which they've since never used? Trying to steal asterisking Mount & Blade as well (ironically, for War of the Roses)? Ship Simulator Extreme? Leviathan? Stalin vs Martians (so bad they've tried to expunge every mention of it)? Defenders of Ardania? A Game of Dwarfs? Impire? They've had more turkeys than Christmas and Thanksgiving combined. well you forgetting CK and CK2, Stellaris, Europa Universalis...

I am not saying they don't publish good games, I am saying they are ****ty publishers

2K perhaps they are... decent

anymore examples what SEGA holds? Can't remember much from them - Lets revive Golden Axe!! Off the top of my head stuff like Golden Axe, Altered Beast, Ecco the Dolphin, Jet Set Radio, Crazy Taxi, Alex Kidd, Zaxxon, House of the Dead, Shining Force, Space Harrier, Streets of Rage. Of course I was a huge Eternal Champions fan back in the day. The thing that bugs me about re-releases is that they only ever seem to keep putting out Genesis versions of the games even with games like Altered Beast or Golden Axe that had arcade versions. I love Golden Axe, but I'd really love to have an arcade version of Golden Axe I and an arcade version of Golden Axe: The Revenge of Death Adder to go along with Golden Axe, Golden Axe II, Golden Axe III from the Genesis. Toss in the Arcade version of Golden Axe: The Duel and you have a pretty decent retrospective set, IMO. But agreed a good new game would be awesome (Golden Axe: Beast Rider is another example of a game that seemed to miss the point of the originals in creating an update). hmm remember only Crazy taxi and Golden Axe

crap only 17 points, but as its based on ****tails and not beers its reasonable