Chilloutman

what is urban fantasy?

Its more way around, how much you are able to accept to be taken away from you by government and than redistributed

ah, rainbow brigade is coming

now you mixing feudal system versus democracy into mix...

seems like you all missed OWN citizens part...

Think there's a famous Marine's quote about this. Should have gone with killing less instead of none I was talking about own citizens, but ok less

capitalism at least worked for some time already and it seems its not killing its own citizens where communism worked for few years in one country and even then it was killing its own citizens. I just can't see why someone still believe it as viable option

yeah sure these 6 years of 80 of soviet union were the 'best' (if you were not anyone else than proletariat ofcourse...)

I would like some decent sci-fi

hah, even you can see through it, noice "The government has softened the legislation by excluding email and messenger providers" THAT WAS ON THE TABLE? Hah, and you want to have communism. Did you ever heard about KGB? they done same stuff with news. Only approved news were allowed. neither surveillance nor corruption is inherent to communism but rather to hierarchies, wouldn't you agree? Well I don't like surveillance too much now, but its difference if its because of breaking the law or if its because you are anti establishment/political opposition

hah, even you can see through it, noice "The government has softened the legislation by excluding email and messenger providers" THAT WAS ON THE TABLE? Hah, and you want to have communism. Did you ever heard about KGB? they done same stuff with news. Only approved news were allowed.

hah, even you can see through it, noice

Which actor/comedian is that? I think I recognize the person but can't place the name. Is that suppose to be a real venting session, I hope not because that entire speech was just subjective diatribe ..... volo please tell me you don't think what he said was valid because he is making the same assumptions he claims the " left " was making. Again speaking on behalf of other people in another country Yes people like me thought Hilary was going to win, everyone assumed that. For him to think anyone would think he knew Hilary was going to lose is just a mendacious and convenient example of social media grandstanding Its okay to admit you were wrong but to learn from it The guy is comedian, but can you please provide few lines you think are not valid?

watched new King Arthur from Guy Richie - Meh again man. I think he can make decent 'historical' 'snatch' movie, but it freaking does not fit if you add so many fantasy elements into it :/

Genocidal maniac? Don't get me wrong. I love and participate in good hyperbole and melodrama to spice up forum chatter. But that is a stretch. Let's see, Trump has been in office for five months now. He has ordered one cruise missile strike that killed 15 people according to Syria. The LA Times thinks is was more like 4 but whatever. Of course the attack was in response to a chemical weapons attack that killed over 70 including children in a US backed rebel group. Not that it was any better than the others but whatever. By July 4 2009 Barack Obama ordered drone strikes that killed over 241 in Afghanistan, Iraq, & Yemen (who we were not even at war with at the time. Of course we were not at war with Syria, Iraq, & Afghanistan either). 241 including non-combatants because air delivered ordinance does not know the difference. And he won a Nobel Peace Prize four months later! But Hitler and Arafat both had those in their trophy cases too so that does not mean much. By the end of 2016 the Obama Admin would order strikes that killed almost 4k people. Just to compare, in the first six months the body count of George W Bush, Bill Clinton, George HW Bush, Ronald Regan, and Jimmy Carter was 0. He is a buffoon and a fool no doubt. But genocidal maniac? Not even CLOSE! Obama came a lot closer. You liked him didn't you? But it's still early. Almost forgot, my source material: https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/projects/drone-war And he dropped MOBA IIRC

heh, so EU wanted to ban weapons - we put our own 2nd amendment into constitution today. Good job EU xD

watched that new Alien, pretty 'meh' if you ask me

that typpo is killing me - mods please fix it!

nothing with 3d realistic graphics age well in meantime here is E3 gameplay footage:

lazy google translate from our Sci-fi author: It's lurking today French President Macron has made an insult to insulting a partner country in the EU saying he is acting as a self-service shop. Reason? We refused to take on the alibi brism of Brussels "adopting a resolution on measures" and we accepted only 12 refugees, instead of accepting 16 (or twenty-five) refugees, as Slovakia did by svejkovsky. Of course, it can go quietly. However, it is symptomatic: there is a ditch between today's West and the former East. The words of today and earlier merit clarification. Today, the West is a little reminded of the West, which was so attractive for the former East to the fall of the Iron Curtain. The West was characterized by terms such as freedom, rationality, efficiency. It was an attractive meta. Then came a series of twists. For twenty-five years, we have been digging out of the worst, even though there is a long way ahead. But with astonishment, we find that after a quarter of a century, the wall of one ideological truth, one force-confirmed doctrine, has risen against us. Basically, regardless of any quotas or non-quotes, it is an eternity of European history - the duality of centralism and decentralization. Throughout history, it has manifested itself differently, typically tension between the crown and the state of manhood (we have paid for it on the White Mountain). Both concepts are equally legitimate. If Milos Zeman talks about national interests and statehood today, it is just as legitimate as others advocate for federalist Europe. Even in the European project, they perceived this dualism from the start - and that is why the principle of subsidiarity, that is to say, an approach to the issue where it is dealt with at an adequate level, has been established. This principle now, Mr Macron and Mrs Merkel, the hegemony of the new Europe, deny. In a situation where Frontex has become a smuggling organization that transports third-world customers to Western sources of support, we refuse to accept the idea that so-called quotas are solutions. They are not. It's just the alibi of the current Union leadership. It is a matter of fact. Twelve refugees or twelve hundred or twelve thousand, for the Czech Republic, is not technically, economically and organizationally, a problem. This is a fundamental political issue. We are extreme allergic to someone who force us the ideological nonsense, apparently against common sense. It is sad but demonstrable: slowly, slowly, Brussels takes over the role played by Moscow for half a century as a source of irrational nonsense of force-enforced. Yes, it is not quite so, but a little, day after day more, that's it. Brussels led by the Juncker-like people lost a 50-million-pound Britain. He is now throwing Visegrád into the corner of the same population. Can Mr. Macron, Mr. Nobody, where he married here, did not know yesterday about him, really think that the European bloc will be shattered in front of him with a half-century experience with the dictatorship of Russia? He certainly will not shudder, but it is certain that he is lurking.

fake but I was not sure for a while xD

Not that I want to drag politics into the comedy thread but the people triggered here are clearly not "SJW liberals" (can't be because all SNL writers ARE obviously liberals and SJWs). It's mostly our heroic defenders of free speech that are triggered and outraged here, going by the comments. dont dig it, they are calling for censorship, does not ring bell as defenders of free speech

beware, last few seconds are annoyingly loud: