Everything posted by Bryy
- MY BIRTHDAY IS RUINED!
-
[Merged] Please make a console version!
Basically.
- Backer Beta: Coming August 18th
-
Beta Release Time
So, 3:30pm then based on server load.
-
Backer Beta: Coming August 18th
With a regular publisher - yes, without a doubt. But with an indie dev like Obsidian I had the apparently foolish illusion they'd actually care enough o think about things like that and release the beta at, say, 8 am local time, so people in other parts of the world would have a chance to play at the stated date as well. But now that I know I'll add another day to any future date they post, just to be sure not to be disappointed again. The obvious answer is Obsidian hates non-Americans.
-
Beta Release Time
In the other thread, Badler said 2pm.
- Backer Beta: Coming August 18th
- Backer Beta: Coming August 18th
-
Beta Release Time
*eye roll* So you don't prefer the communication? You would rather be left wondering? No. The eye roll was to you giving a bunch of strangers an "I told you so".
- Distribution via Steam and GOG (DRM-free)
-
Beta Release Time
Afternoon is traditionally 12pm - 4pm.
-
Beta Release Time
*eye roll*
- I HAVE BEEN BORN!
- BETA LIVESTREAM INFO/COMPILATION: Bro, do you even Livestream?
- Backer Beta: Coming August 18th
- Backer Beta: Coming August 18th
- Backer Beta: Coming August 18th
-
Julian Assange, to hand himself over?
... what?
- Update #83: Backer Portal, Backer Beta, and Wasteland 2 Keys
- Dragon Age: Inquisition vs. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
- I HAVE BEEN BORN!
- Update #83: Backer Portal, Backer Beta, and Wasteland 2 Keys
-
Guess the release date!
I'm totally ashamed of everyone that wrote any date past January.
-
Dragon Age: Inquisition vs. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
It does not matter. For me, DLCs - especially "plug-in" DLCs - have always been an all-or-nothing proposition. The "nothing" means I would not even bother with the main game. If I play a game, I want the "full" experience. In the past, I have always been able to enjoy the full experience with all the DLCs, with minimal hassle and reasonable expenses. Then BioWare came up with its current business model to use DLCs to squeeze and exploit customers. BioWare and their fans tell me, "well, you do not have to get all the DLCs." Well, I am not going to change my gaming preference just for BioWare. If BioWare does not provide that experience without exploitation, I as a customer can take my money elsewhere, and I do. There are plenty of other great RPG developers out there who can give me the full experience without enforcing an exploitative business model on me or or forcing me to compromise my gaming preference. I don't understand. You buy all the DLC to get the "full game". But somehow, BioWare DLC is exploitative? You're being exploited just by being the type of gamer that needs all the DLC. Companies are exploiting the completionist in you.
-
Dragon Age: Inquisition vs. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
When I said BioWare products are integrated/tied into their business models, I meant that if a customer wanted to fully utilize a recent BioWare product, he would have to download and install EA Origin to activate the product, buy more BioWare Points than he would need, and then use those Points to buy DLCs at full prices. BioWare products are tied to EA Origin, BioWare Points, and DLCs, which are very specific to EA-BioWare. While I understand and sorta respect not wating to download hundreds of clients, what DLC do you need that is essential to the main game?