-
Posts
5618 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by BruceVC
-
Thanks for the tips guys
-
It seems like Obama has won another 4 years, yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay CNN has called a Democrat victory, we just need the results for Ohio to confirm this.
-
What are you playing now - the plays the thing
BruceVC replied to LadyCrimson's topic in Computer and Console
Hope you enjoy it. Remember it has it's own forum section Yes I'll be posting there as well -
"did the blonde seem high" , thats funny
-
Thats the same as me, I have never played a game twice. For me even though there may be nuances with the story, or different character plots, end of the day you know how the game ends. So I battle getting excited once I know the ending.
-
Hi All I have read some of the positive reviews around AP, last week I downloaded it from Steam and will be playing it this week. I just wanted to say hi to the AP community. I'll post my comments around the game as I progress
-
What are you playing now - the plays the thing
BruceVC replied to LadyCrimson's topic in Computer and Console
I have just finished Risen 2 so I'll be starting on Alpha Protocol this week -
Sorry I'm confused. People have the right to express their opinion unless their a celebrity? No he's not saying celebrities can't express a political opinion. He is against celebrities using there fame and status to influence people. A decision to vote shouldn't be decided on what your favorite actor thinks but rather who you believe is the correct candidate, and sadly some people will be influenced by what celebrities think so there vote isn't based on objective opinion.
-
I am interested in what you mean by ways that God has revealed himself to you in certain ways. Can you elaborate , or are they personal and difficult to explain?
-
I am planning on staying awake from 1 am tomorrow to watch the Election live on CNN. Its really interesting to see the commentary and the electoral map of the USA as you see each state going red or blue
-
Let us assume that there is such a thing as a God, an Absolute. As such, God cannot be defined by a single manifestation somewhere in the material world, as that would mean that God has been defined somewhere, someplace and at that very moment, he ceases to be God. An Absolute encompasses everything. Yes, even nothing. All predicates of logic disappear when you are talking about an Absolute as it is everywhere, in all times and outside of all times. When a religion talks about God it talks in images and representations, it does not use clear terms as to what it is. That's why for example in Christianity we have, the Holly Father, Son and the Holly Spirit. These are representations of the Absolute Object, the Absolute Subject and the Absolute Relation between them. Furthermore, because the people who had such revelations had very limited understanding, and as William James states, the spiritual experience varies for every person experiencing it because they interpret it with their knowledge, they found the most optimal ways to put them into word. Believe you me, trying to explain something beyond your comprehension which is everything at the same time is no easy task. Now what we really need is to have a clear terminology for these things, something that a philosopher called Georg Hegel has accomplished, though because he is incredibly difficult to understand, he has fallen into obscurity and most modern philosophers look by and down on him. At any rate - yes, there is proof, attained with reasoning that there is such a thing as a God or rather an Absolute, but it is not exactly what religions make it out to be, MAINLY because they show it through unclear images and representations - not through terms and reasoning, which is why in recent years atheism has become popular, because there are just too many gaps and non-reasonable things in a given belief system and it makes one wonder. I must say though, that whoever reads the Bible and takes everything within it at face value is seriously making a huge mistake. But even when it finally is explained and all is revealed, you will still need some faith in order to understand. Actually you need faith to even begin to attempt to understand. Because understanding the Absolute is only accomplished at a spiritual level, though you can certainly see the absolute's otherness, you can not begin to understand it itself if you continuously grind in its otherness. You make some interesting points, I can believe in a higher power or rather some Absolute but our interpretation and definition of it is still wrong then. Almost all religions have predefined rules and views of what you need to say or do in order to follow this Absolute. And this I don't prescribe to. Don't get me wrong I try to follow the Christian lifestyle, values like love your fellow mankind and don't commit murder because I believe that most of it represents a good and wholesome lifestyle. But I don't follow it for religious belief reasons.
-
Thats a funny story But maybe the spider was just popping in to say hello? PS : I detest spiders and I am quite terrified by them
-
Thanks for the detailed response, I am not trying to attack any religion but I want to ask you some questions around the highlighted parts of your post. You mention that accepting Christianity can be partly about the weight of evidence But my question is a simple one, can you provide any evidence at all. Anything irrefutable that there is god. I haven't seen or known about anything that suggests there is a higher power, like lights in the sky or some kind of manifestation of an entity. When people ask for this the normal response is "you need to have faith to believe" so we go around in circles. And then if faith is holding onto things that your reason has accepted how can your reason accept something if there is no proof. I know you have pointed out that your reason can be irrational, like your anesthetic story, but that doesn't change the fact your reason is wrong. Aren't you then saying that faith based on reason can be inherently flawed? So for me that makes no sense for a person to be religious as once again it go's back to the point that there is no real proof.
-
I first read that as the TV turning on would be "silly, pointless and waste of peoples time". Rereading it, I suppose discussing whether it would always turn on was the exercise in futility Sometimes we need to take things at face value and believe we are right in order to progress. It may later turn out we were wrong, but we need some kind of starting point. I wonder if Newton would have foreseen the LHC when he got struck by that apple? You are right, I left out an important word that made the sentence make sense
-
No, my answers are based on philosophically explaining to you what faith is, you can take it or leave it. For some reason I can't edit my post, but anyway, here's some things for you prosper. Everything you do is based on your faith in something. You go to bed with the belief that you will wake up in the morning. You need faith in order to have purpose. Once again, I repeat faith is a product of the self-awareness. It is how humans function. It is part of existence, so the answer to your question "Why bother with faith" is because you cannot exist normally without it. It is lesson we can take from Descartes' "Cogito ergo sum". He was looking for proof that there's anything real, that something exists. He came to the realization, that he can doubt everything, even faith, even his own existence, even the fact that he is sitting in front of his fireplace. The one undoubtable thing is that you cannot doubt doubt itself, thus leading to the conclusion that there is something real. His doubt nearly drove him to madness, because he had lost faith that he exists, or that anything is real. Understand that faith is a function of the self-aware consciousness, you cannot function without it. Some people think they need faith, because they lack the will to do something, and having said faith gives them a certain motivation. Faith gives you the power to be able to overcome something, whatever it may be. In all actuality the only faith you need is faith in yourself, but that cannot happen, without you first understanding what and who you are. The description of the word faith has different meanings depending on the context. I thought this post was going to be more about religion and the fact that all religions require faith but there is no proof. This is one of the reasons I am not religious but more spiritual . People say " you must have faith to be religious" but from an analytical perspective this means there is no way to quantify any religion, you believe because you want to and you get told a certain message. This is something we can discuss as there would be many interesting opinions But if you want us to discuss faith around things like I assume my TV will turn on today that would be silly, pointless and waste of peoples time.
-
I can't give enough praise to how brilliant the books are, absolutely captivating. George R R Martin is a genius, the way you get to relate to so many characters displays some of his skill with the pen. I really encourage people to read the books.
-
I had an excellent week, I have come back from my trip to Vegas really invigorated and with new suggestions on how to be a better software consultant. Despite the long flight times the Symposium was well worth it. We had some excellent motivational speakers who discussed soft business skills and not just technical concepts. My favorite was John Care, http://www.linkedin.com/in/johncare Really dynamic and interesting public speaker, kept you captivated the whole time
-
Cracked had a lengthy article which summarized some very solid scientific reasons why a zombie apocalypse would fail, even if it were possible (which it isn't,) it was quite a fun read. http://www.cracked.c...il-quickly.html Gems include this bit on biting as a method of transmission: "Hey, remember that time when that dog got rabies, and then a day later, every single other dog on the continent had it, except for a small band of survivors huddled in a basement? No? That never happened?" Yeah that was good and fun read, I am glad they mentioned my gun justification. But now an apocalypse like " I am Legend" , that could conceivably wipe out a continent.
- 20 replies
-
- Zombies
- It could happen
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
I have often thought about this and discussed it with friends, how would we survive if such a catastrophe as "Walking Dead" occurred . One of the things I always found unrealistic about Zombie Apocalypses (apart from the obvious that Zombies aren't real) is that there more guns, weapons and bullets in the USA to wipe out the entire USA population many times over. So I can't see the military ever not being able to deal with a Zombie threat systematically and comprehensively. Anyway back to question, we know Zombies congregate around cities. So the obvious and easiest solution is to go to remote regions like Mountains. There you could hunt, fish and try to live off the land. You only need to make trips to cities for major supplies, in South Africa we have many mountain ranges that would be ideal. A remote island would be perfect, as their probably won't be any Zombies. Ideally a cruise ship would be the perfect base, you could dock at a remote island and sleep on the ship and get shelter but use the island for fresh food. But you would need someone with survival skills as I don't think setting snares and traps is that easy
- 20 replies
-
- Zombies
- It could happen
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with:
-
Gaming is resourceful in my books
-
What are you playing now - the plays the thing
BruceVC replied to LadyCrimson's topic in Computer and Console
That's great to hear. I scooped it up a couple of days ago but am waiting to finish the main story before playing it. The trailer certainly made it look pretty fun and wacky. Out of curiosity, about how long is it? (If you've completed it) I have just bought Sleeping Dogs and will be playing it after Risen 2. I am glad its getting good endorsements While I have not yet finished the main story, so this is subject to change, I'm strongly leaning toward Sleeping Dogs being my Game of the Year. The game is far from perfect but I've had a blast playing it. I'm 30+ hours in (I've done tons of optional stuff like races, drug busts, favors, etc.) and have loved every second. I find pretty much everything in the game to be fun, even the driving, once I got used to the twitchy and kinda weird driving model. Even after having kicked the **** out of hundreds of dudes, I still immensely enjoy beating them up. I love hauling ass through the city (it definitely helps that Honk Kong is such a fantastic setting). I like singing karaoke. I love getting into firefights on foot and in vehicles. I love on foot chases. I really love action hijacking. I still always have a big goofy grin on my face whenever I play the game, it's just really fun. Sounds great, thanks for the relevant information -
This summarizes my view on the game. I also want to add that I enjoyed the narrative, seeing what happens to Hawke and exploring your party members histories and respective quests. It definitely was a playable game, but not worth bragging about.
-
What are you playing now - the plays the thing
BruceVC replied to LadyCrimson's topic in Computer and Console
That's great to hear. I scooped it up a couple of days ago but am waiting to finish the main story before playing it. The trailer certainly made it look pretty fun and wacky. Out of curiosity, about how long is it? (If you've completed it) I have just bought Sleeping Dogs and will be playing it after Risen 2. I am glad its getting good endorsements -
Good to hear you okay, its a relief you will still be able to disagree with me on the Romance\Sex thread
-
Don't get me wrong, people are aware of it. And we see some clubs and events that encourage a dress-up for the evening. But no one go's "trick or treating" that I know of