He doesn't have one. Like literary none.
He would have one if these games were commerical failures (which they aren't) or George was responsible for the content which is considered *bad* in those games (he isn't)
It may be a weak argument, but I would not call it an absence of an argument. Although, I do disagree with it.
edit: I do not want to push further into the debate, since we should all be happy to have Ziets regardless. Hopefully I can find a copy of the game eventually. Not sure why steam pulled it.
Two things to think about:
- What has a simple designer (not even Lead) to do with the commerical success. Or even if a game is overall good.
- How much holds his argument up when on the majority of these games other developers that are also working on this game were also involved (in Lead positions even). What exactly absolves them from his logic?
It's a paradoxical, false argument without any fact (except pointless assumption) supporting it.