C2B
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by C2B
-
I can kinda see the monk working well in the art style Eternity seems to be (Screenshot). More so than most of the other monks posted here, to be honest. Can actually imagine all the charachters shown so far quite well. -
-
-
Random Information: The man working on it is Rob Nesler.
-
My wishes -Tim Cain recipes Actually make that an entire thing by itself
-
http://www.polinadesign.com/
-
Polina Hristova is drawing them. So, yes. She's in the Kickstarter Video as well. You see her draw Edair. (Well, she's winking at the camera at that moment)
-
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRsTwF0aHv6dFVwaTF1WTI5b24tbGxpQUdQNU1TSHc&pli=1#gid=18
-
http://ruinedkingdoms.com/project-eternity/
-
It's still a good possibility, that didn't change. If we enter the final 72 hours with 3 Million (at least with Paypal) 500'000 seems possible during the last surge.
-
Wheellock mechanism. Even before Flintlock.
-
Actually, older. American Revolution was in the 18th. Also, OP should be informed regarding history, though I think others are better suited for that then I.
-
The end
-
Why does that Interviewer choose these questions. Is he just bored?
-
Why the hostility? And again, Obsidian always played with grey charachters. They never had a writing approach of good/evil. Because you were patronising and looking down your nose. If you can't see it then accept it was there. Yeah, the *Why do you play Obsidian's games* was a bit too aggressivly worded. Sorry.
-
It won't be. I'm pretty sure Sawyer meant exactly what you said about New Vegas. There will be morals. It just won't be morals from the perspective of the writer, but ones from the perspective of the charachter. I think that is what he meant.
-
Why the hostility? And again, Obsidian always played with grey charachters. They never had a writing approach of good/evil.
-
I'm not even remotely interested in realism. If I want that I can go to work or wander up the road. I want to play a larger-than-life character, and if that means an archetypical villain then so be it. Am not interested in woolly, muesli-eating BS about relativity, TBH. Why exactly do you play Obsidian games then? To be clear, are you suggesting that the NPCs, from a rural midwife to a joinable wizard, won't have clear ideas of good and evil? Some might take a more philosophical view. Others will absolutely *know* what is good and evil. As concepts, good and evil exist and will need to be addressed within the game. Read my last post. Ofc they will have concepts of good and evil depending on their values. Obsidian will just not approach them WRITING in good and evil terms. They never have before in their other games as well.
-
Yes, but society itself treats different actions as either good or evil. I certainly understand the argument that good and evil are subjective. However, go cap a police officer and see how many people want to execute you for your 'evil' actions. Just because you can make arguments about good or evil regarding theoretical situations doesn't mean that the people populating the game will completely abandon the idea of good and evil and the vast majority of them will believe that they, personally, know the difference at a glance. They're not. I think you misunderstood what Josh said. They will not approach WRITING them in good/evil terms. The charachters themselves have values and may see certain things as good and evil depending on them.
-
I'm not even remotely interested in realism. If I want that I can go to work or wander up the road. I want to play a larger-than-life character, and if that means an archetypical villain then so be it. Am not interested in woolly, muesli-eating BS about relativity, TBH. Why exactly do you play Obsidian games then?
-
No? Because Good and Evil are concepts that entirly lie in the eye of the beholder it's not something good to start from if you want realistic personalities.
-
What's wrong?
-
oO at that last question
Smaller than Spain
