Jump to content

Orogun01

Members
  • Posts

    3913
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by Orogun01

  1. This Although I believe that Greg and Ray have taken up to more of a managerial position, overseeing various projects but not taking part on them.
  2. A Panentheistic, ultimate deity its hard to define by virtue of its definition the divergence it's only relevant if we define aspects of our Gods in the metaphysical plane through will. We constantly diverge and differ on everything because that's the nature of our grasp on knowledge (Think Plato's Cave) we formulate our views based on the scope of our knowledge and beyond that we can perceive the makings of a greater force. That we attribute it to a deity may be our way of making sense of the constant "unknowable", the continuous questions emergent from our grasp on reality. I doubt they will be a day when all questions are answered and as our knowledge of the Universe becomes more complex our need for understanding also grows and so there is always the possibility of a God. And now off to read comics until I fall asleep.
  3. Demo?! Demo!!! Did I hear Demo!!! I am so wanting to play it. Is there a sex scene?
  4. Good game, I was expecting a GTA clone but this game it's completely crazy and brilliant. I can't tell if the folk at Volition are geniuses or morons (guess that makes them hipsters) but this game it's awesome.
  5. I love South Park so...."Screw you guy, I'm going home"
  6. But if we are unable to observe God in his acts all we have left its whatever we attribute to be God, so in that sense God becomes whatever we are.(Omnipresence) Since we try to understand and explain phenomena through our collective knowledge; to it's extent, God becomes known in what we can perceive.(Omniscience) So in the Psychological sense (excluding Freud) God it's the explanation of the unknown greater force of our lives, it could either be an emergent property of our need for order or the final conclusion drawn from our interpretations of metaphysical experiences.
  7. This thread is starting to sound like Twitter, someone do something interesting!
  8. I'm assuming you mean bullworker? They're actually pretty good. Had a great start to the day, was in bed when someone kicked my front door in, got up and ran to the lounge only to find the door open, wood and part of the door lock on the ground but no one there. Don't really understand the thought process. I presume you canvassed the neighbours? I'm not sure if it's appropriate, but in some places you can get better information by saying something along the lines of "This strange feller came into my house and left his watch. I don't feel right keeping it, can you remember seeing anyone around?" Because if you say it was a break in then peopple either clam up or get confused. Wals acting like a spy... I gigglesqueed
  9. I don't know what you said but it sounds dirty. A bulwarker is basically just a big spring in a piston arrangement. You push the two ends together. Still dirty
  10. I don't think the fault lies with the customer since they can't know if a game is buggy beforehand or if those bugs will apply to their gaming experience. Victim blaming simply doesn't make sense, it's like you think that they were asking for a buggy game.
  11. I don't know what you said but it sounds dirty.
  12. The old RPG or the Total war'ish strategy game? Are they both good or bad?
  13. Doubt it, speaking from experience beggars have no interest in kingdoms. Also it's a good thing that he has no ambition, I would not want an Augustus or an Alexander at the helm of the NK army.
  14. Better than one who's explosive, surely? Thank you for putting that image in my head, Wals
  15. Based on this thread, I think you'd have to explain "cool" to a lot of people here. Okay, but who's cool enough to teach us cool? Fonzie?
  16. Go on Prosper, tell us about how crappy your life is. It will make us all feel better.
  17. Merry Christmas, no promises on not getting drunk.
  18. Same reason it's not done in submarines. In space you can't really see anything with an naked eye. And may I add that like in a combat submarine it's a hazard.In combat the fact that it would be on the front of the ship makes it a prime target and not only that, but there is bound to be some decay from constantly wear from minuscule space trash. Plus, space its a vacuum no reason why spaceships should only fly straight. (That's what Shep said)
  19. You forget one fact that they ME writers are acutely aware of: ME fans care more about the romances than the science, they're more likely to throw a fit if their favorite companion isn't romanceable than if they decided to get rid off the "mass effect fields" and instead use magic gnomes as the cause of all phenomena.
  20. Probably speculation following the announcement that the director was going to finish the project as a freelancer.
  21. Having a pilot at the front and a floor to ceiling window at his station is probably significantly worse than beam weapons not being up to expectation. The Normandy isn't a battlecruiser. It's not suppose to engage in combat. Plus since it is designed for stealth, it would have limited sensors as well. Are you trying to tell me that it's a ship designed to be piloted by looking out the window? Why, it made perfect sense when they did it on Star Trek.
  22. Look for all atheist attacks on Religion and their incessant quoting of the Middle Ages, Christianity has managed to chisel their ethics into humanity. They may believe that one is born with a sense of good and evil but that's simply not true. Thousands of years of acquired behavior have shaped us into quite the docile breed.
×
×
  • Create New...