Zoraptor

They wouldn't actually be fully universal rules since for some sports the competitors' sex is irrelevant (eg equestrian). The idea would be that the IOC sets actual rules so that the relevant associations have to be consistent. In isolation, there's nothing wrong with the IOC deciding Lin and Khalif or anyone else can compete and overruling the relevant association, but it isn't in isolation. It's not as obviously inconsistent as the previous Olympics where you had Semenya effectively banned while a fully transgender athlete was allowed to compete, but that was only 3 years ago, and Semenya is still only 33 and could have plausibly still been competing even now. They should have- need, as a minimum requirement- a system to stop bodies like World Athletics or the IBA, though I find the evidence for it being a personal targeting of Lin/ Khalif unconvincing, being able to specifically target athletes. To put it that perspective, World Athletics completely ignored the recommendation that some field events be covered by the same rules and only applied them to the track events Semenya competed in; compared to Khalif beating a Russian a week earlier who remained out of the competition. Given the context of the controversy all being manufactured by Russia now it's also worth pointing out that the most strident competitor critics of the 2016 800m women's event were... a Pole, and a Brit.

Basically anything with a computer suffers from similar issues. The one that got a lot of traction (ohoho) here was John Deere being able to brick their tractors' control/ management computers if you decided not to pay their annual licensing sub or got an unsanctioned repair. Certainly not a recent phenomenon even outside gaming, eg here's an article from 2016 about John Deere's shenanigans.

Yep, show was good and was pretty consistent with the games imo. There's a potential lore mismatch with Fallout 1 I noticed, though it isn't serious- the way the show vaults are shown and where they are located the Master would have found them when he started looking well before the events of F1. I tend to pick things apart for verisimilitude/ 'historical' accuracy and if that's the worst I could come up with there isn't much cause for complaint. The one most people complained about was the date for a certain plot point regarding the NCR that was shown on the classroom whiteboard not matching up with New Vegas' timeline, but that was clearly indicating that said plot point happened after the date indicated, not at it, so no actual inconsistency.

So the Italian boxer was... bribed by Russia to throw in the towel to get eastern Europeans upset? Doesn't seem overly likely. The last boxer Khalif beat at the 2023 IBA WC (?and the one who got upgraded to bronze after her disqualification?*) was South Korean. She did beat a Russian in the 1st round, but went on to box twice (*) after that. What the tests showed has certainly not been consistent in the press since both elevated testosterone and genetically male chromosomes have been stated as being the cause there, but the IBA chair has specifically said it was a chromosomal result ie XY/ genetic maleness which caused the dq in the last day or so. That is ~trivial to disprove if it were false, and neither appealed to the CAS which you'd expect as a matter of course. The wikipedia article is actually kind of funny in retrospect as the dqs were not considered enough to even make the 'controversies' section. End of the day the issue is caused by the IOC not having the courage to make actual Olympic wide rules about the issue and just issuing an extraordinarily wishy washy "Framework" instead. If they did make actual rules it wouldn't matter whether it was them or the IBA or World Athletics deciding eligibility and all of Lin, Khalif and Semenya would be free- or not- to compete based on rules everyone knew. But they can't do that, because any decision they made would inevitably offend someone and cut down on their commercial opportunities. *for extra confusion, the official results have the ROK boxer winning 5-0 instead of by dq, and Khalif is credited with coming =5th. Unlike Lin who does have a dq result and isn't placed at all, but obviously did box since she progressed to the quarters. Everyone seems to agree Khalif was actually dqed as well though.

It is kind of funny to see people say the accusations are all Russian propaganda from a Russian organisation. Fairly sure the Russians wouldn't target Algeria, their north African ally, nor China. There's no actual reason to suspect anything other than a genuine issue at play and it being embarrassing for the IOC. Similarly, extremely 'funny' seeing the usual suspects claiming she's transgender when they also tend to regard Arabs as being incredibly backwards. Not like Algeria is a religious hotbed with women stoned on the street for showing an ankle but still, they also aren't the Sweden of 101 stereotypes either. The famous case was an East German shotput or hammer thrower who essentially transitioned involuntarily from all the androgens she was given (but at least won gold, iirc). Indeed, there are a bunch of women's records set in the 80s that still stand; far more than for mens athletics. (Definitely wasn't just the eastern bloc doing it though, there are a decent number of not closely challenged since 80s records set by americans as well)

Eh, it's not really 'dumb', though the phrasing is obviously inflammatory since there's a very real issue at play, and one that has not been dealt with with any sort of consistency at all. (The issue is not transgender like Lauren Hubbard competing in weightlifting at Tokyo despite being born a man- and who failed all her lifts anyway iirc- since Khalif isn't transgender; the issue is, well, Caster Semenya basically. Who got pretty specifically targeted by rule changes. Indeed, Khalif competing at Tokyo while Semenya couldn't in her favoured events just reinforces how inconsistent the rules are. The real issue is almost certainly not Khalif anyway, it's almost certainly not wanting to 'ban' the Chinese athlete)

Not overly surprising given the nature of the 'evidence' for Ukrainian SF presence in Syria previous. Al Qaeda has of course claimed it, but they would happily claim pretty much anything and everything nowadays*. It's still most likely to be some flavour of MNLA or other Azawad Nationalist grouping responsible given those groups are hardly monolithic and are variously fighting against and allied with Al Qaeda and adjacent groups. It's very likely some at least are both Azawad liberation and AlQ, just wearing different hats as convenient. Difficult to see any plausible involvement from any 3rd party country in it. *apparently they launched an Inghimasi operation that broke a meat thermometer recently.

Somehow I doubt any influence in Mali is about naval bases. While they have hardly covered themselves in glory it seems likely that the Russian Navy knows Mali has no coastline. As for why you can ask the same of France and the answer is likely to be the same with a couple of variations. Because they can, and it doesn't cost them anything much*. The addition for France is the historical colonial ties with a dollop of paternalism and not wanting problems in more important places like Niger; for Russia it's causing embarrassment to France and Macron in particular. *the far more large scale intervention in Syria cost Russia next to nothing as the budget all came from training, they just blew up moderate democratic puppy orphanages sheltering in the last bakery of a Leppo/ religious nutbar cannibals and child beheaders instead of training areas in X oblast with almost exclusively old dumb bombs (albeit using a semi precise launch system). Probably cost the French a bit more, but not much, and it wouldn't be surprising if what it did cost came out of a development budget. Heh, I think it's time to pull out the old Wall Street Journal article on the IMF and Zaire (as was) again. Sadly, they've finally got around to paywalling it by the looks of things but the gist is that every single IMF intervention left Zaire materially worse off, not better. Or as one person put it, the difference between Chinese and Western development loans is that at least with China you actually get the roads.

Eh, not really. Per terrorism people tend to forget that Ukraine packed an unsuspecting Azeri's truck full of explosives and blew him up, which was terrorism unless you define it as only being done by bad people to good people*. Otherwise, they've already claimed direct support of the rebels in Syria before. Which label is relevant depends on which Tuareg rebels it was. They had some genuine liberation types, but also got co-opted very hard by AQIM. And of course you can never be quite sure if they aren't the same people getting a 'brave patriot mujahedin fighting for freeeeedom <--> terrorist Al Qaeda oppressing and terrorising' switch via some TLA in Virginia whenever it's convenient. *one would be forgiven for thinking that's the crucial part of the definition given the Russia/ Israel dichotomy in coverage. Just imagine the reaction if Russia tortured an orthopaedic surgeon to death but for Israel... just ignore it and applaud.

Seems to be confirmed now (via non official channel, but not denied by Intel) that the damage is permanent once it occurs, and no microcode/ BIOS or other update will fix it.

I'd suspect so as well, and that wouldn't be true for many recent politicians. He's favoured a bit by having Trump as a comparison and so looking a lot more, hmm, normal in pretty much every respect but he seems to have done his best over a very long time period and despite a lot of stuff which would have given others serious issues. He's also one of the few US politicians who seemed pretty genuine rather than just sculpting everything for politics, though that may mean he was just better at sculpting than most. The only major criticism I can think of offhand for his presidency- beyond the institution/ systemic ones they all suffer from- was the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan. Which had a lot of mitigation given it was a Trump era deal and the failures that lead to that collapse started 20 years earlier but still, having the government not even last up until departure time was Bad even if it was likely inevitable whatever the schedule for leaving.

One hates to be that guy (or do I?) but Sulla actually did resign his Dictatorship too. After rewriting Rome's 'constitution' and slaughtering a bunch of people etc, but he did resign, and retired to his villa to, well, give Tiberius, Caligula, Nero, Commodus and Elagobalus a few ideas for fun ways to pass the time before dying of liver failure; he was after all a well known Conservative politician. The issue wasn't really the office of Dictator, that just gave Sulla (et al) a facade of legality. His authority ultimately descended from the point of a pilum, not from the law. The root issue was that the Marian Reforms had changed the troops in the Roman Army from being small landowners loyal to Rome to being mercenaries loyal to their general. Which had to happen since said small landowners had basically been genocided by a string of impeccably bred incompetents feeding them to various hordes of wandering Germans. In an amazing coincidence a bunch of patricians got to own huge amounts of land after buying up parcels off destitute widows... Anyway, got to give Biden credit for calling it quits; tempered somewhat by it being easier if you're going to lose if you keep running.

The Russians can probably afford the wastage more though. One of those things which you could kind of see why they did it at the time- PR for the counteroffensive's failure, making sure Russian troops were tied down etc- but went on far too long and was far too static. Just sitting there having to supply everything across the Dnieper via boat... it's just dumb. You could probably achieve much the same with cross river hit and run raids, with a much less vulnerable/ static supply line. You can justify Anzio2 if you have the Allies resources and your enemy has 1944 Germany's, not so much if it's the reverse. Not cutting losses when needed has been Ukraine's #1 problem. If you have to withdraw you're going to take a morale/ PR hit, but it's less if you don't look like you've been throwing soldiers' lives away pointlessly, and you still have a bunch of soldiers alive that you can use more productively elsewhere. As always depends a lot on actual casualties and whether KI's translation is accurate for location. If the losses actually are >1000 dead and missing only in the village then it was an unmitigated disaster for Ukraine given they also claim Russian losses as 'only' ~1200. It seems unlikely less than 200 Ukrainians died in the river or in staging areas or in lancet/ UPMK/ artillery strikes on the west bank, and a 1:1 ratio is utterly unsustainable. (also has to be said belatedly, the UkrMoD still claims to be fighting on the east bank as of today and repelled five assaults. Presumably that's Krynky since they don't hold anywhere else on the east bank)

I'd stress I haven't played post update but supposedly they didn't fix many bugs, broke mods that did fix those bugs, introduced new bugs and those bugs it did fix were too often a bit half arsed eg stretching the UI to 'fix' ultrawide.

The next gen version of FO4 was a free update, and has replaced the old version everywhere (except GOG, and maybe roll back option on Steam?). Many people felt ripped off at 0$, if they'd tried charging for it the reaction would have been... grim.

Probably difficult to tell how widespread it is when one of (the?) most common errors for gaming rigs made it look like a video card issue. Very interesting that the issue happens even when locked to 125W by server MBs.

Yeah, that doesn't look faked. Never much realistic chance it was, despite how much some may have wanted it to be. Not what an already highly charged situation needed, at all.

I've only used gamepass with free months, and for that it was great value. We got a cool 32% increase to monthly cost to nearly 30 bucks. Wouldn't effect me much anyway since I only ever sub to services for a month at a time but it will be interesting to see at what point the ubiquitous subscriber network price hikes become unsustainable.

Kind of interesting that we also got 'Vice President Trump' from Biden today as well. If his only issue was mixing up friends' and enemies' names it'd all be a bit of a laugh.

Introducing Zelensky as Putin is a fairly significant gaffe worthy of some sort of coverage. Maybe not 6+ breaking newsbits worth though.

Gothic remake was not done by PB but by 'Alkimia Interactive'. And to paraphrase the great philosopher Ron Paul: it's still happening (so far as we know and though many may wish it wasn't). Indeed, Embracer tried to sell/ spin off PB along with Risen and Elex, but not Gothic.

Don't know if proportional representation would work that well in the UK, certainly not MMP type. It'd probably just result in the libdems getting eviscerated for (not) going into coalition with the wrong people like always happens to the centre party here. They've barely recovered from Clegg's decision and there would be even more pressure to choose under MMP. And it's unfortunately unlikely politicians would ever go for something actually decent like multi member STV since it weakens parties, unlike MMP. In most other circumstances 34% would be a dismal result for Labour and they must still be concerned about the number of people in their traditional heartland who have not come back. It's likely the tories can get a lot of the reform vote back but it may be permanently lost to a Labour party that isn't even chardonnay socialist any more.

Unsurprisingly the Tories have lost the election in Britain. Moderate lols at both Farage and Corbyn winning, and Truss losing. Big lols at Keir Starmer being described as 'left wing' when he's the dictionary definition of milquetoast moderate. Guess at least Rishi Sunak can console himself with the thought that he's still richer than his head of state.

I wish the guy who insisted Russia wouldn't use nukes even if the US nuked Moscow was still around. Or the guy who insisted that Russia's nukes wouldn't work, even if they tried to use them. Would make for an interesting argument.

For a bit of balance, there were a few places where I thought Rowling fell down when it came to planning and related matters, all towards the end of the series. The revelation of horcruxes seemed to be rather... not exactly abrupt, but it kind of needed more fleshing out earlier so that you don't just get a big expositionary sequence from Slughorn. It was clearly planned, but the execution was not great. Similarly and worse while the Deathly Hallows were introduced individually early on their significance mostly seemed to be a way to drive the plot of the book (movie). If someone told me that Rowling had picked them semi randomly because she was having difficulty getting people where she wanted them to be organically I'd have certainly believed that, with the possible exception of the wand (and even then the 'rule' its significance relied on was ?new? to DH? very iirc).