Zoraptor

Jared is the lead in the CW 'Walker' series. I presume The Winchesters shoots in Vancouver as Supernatural did and Walker in Texas so there would be some logistical and scheduling issues with him appearing on both even on a very limited basis.

I have some questions about how functional a Mandalorian helmet on a Togruta would be. (I'll add it to my list of big Star Wars questions below "How does Watto manage to fly with wings that size?")

There are a few ways the 4 episode rumour could be right. They could have lowered the episode count by making the episodes longer; 4x2 hour 'movies' for a LotR series would make a lot of sense in some ways (and not much in others, the RoP episodes were already long, after all). Or they could have split the season into two four episode halves (ie S2A/ S2B) to have something to show annually, if it were taking longer to film than expected. I very much doubt that is what has actually happened though and yeah, actually reducing the minutes shot seems... unlikely. They do likely have a lot less of a blank cheque now though. A lot of their money was spent very badly in S1.

They could have picked a better ytimg since there ain't nothing wrong with a Mosin Nagant, so long as they're used for the right job and have a scope rather than ironsights. They're far more accurate over considerably longer distances than most ARs- which aren't really designed for accuracy but rof- and unlike other similar era rifles use a cartridge that is still widely available in the 7.62x54. Indeed, it's still used by the highly regarded Dragunov/ SVD series of sniper rifles as well as medium machine guns (not just infantry weapons like the PKM but also including those on most tanks/ ifvs etc). You wouldn't particularly want to be sitting in a trench facing a stereotypical human wave attack using only a M N since it's bolt action and thus has a slow as treacle firing rate, but if you're sitting further back picking targets off in a trench they're as good as many and better than most. They'll also penetrate most body armour set ups, and at decent range- which isn't true of 5.45 AR rounds. Mosin Nagants are also being used by Ukraine extensively for similar reasons- along with Maxim guns, designed even earlier and using the same round.

Well, you could theoretically get close to working it out. Or at least work out the top end and a plausible scenario. per Nielson, 9.4bn minutes of RoP watched, 557 minutes series length --> 16.8 million full series equivalent views in the US in 2022. That's the upper limit, and assumes that around 34mn people watched exactly 2 minutes then quit --> total viewership of ~51mn. A more plausible scenario would be quitters watching on average the first 2 episodes each (132 minutes). That would reduce total series watches to, hmm, around 12 million? and partial series watches to around 23 million* for about 35mn total viewership. Then try and extrapolate out to world wide. RoP definitely has a bit of Tall Poppy Syndrome about it, but, a retention rate of 37% really is poor verging on disastrous. It implies the audience for RoP S2 in the US would be ~12 million max. Retention rate is of course a very limited measure practically since it doesn't measure enjoyment or whether people maintain their subs based on liking it, indeed while I hated WoT with the burning passion of a million suns I watched to the end, so even I'd be included in a positive metric. It even looks like I subbed to Prime specifically to watch it. *head maths, too early in the morning here to solve accurately. It's going to bug me though, since I am at least mildly interested in the answer 9.6bn minutes under that scenario, so pretty close.

There's no reason why anyone would be unless there were special circumstances. If a random Chicagoite were lured into an Embassy and dismembered while alive that would get coverage too. "One death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic" Good old Apocryphal, quote to fit any situation. And that one really does fit. People are way more likely to feel bad about the death of someone whose name they know and whose picture they see repetitively than about a long list of names or a big number; it's just human nature.

Yeah, leaking on Discord makes a break from traditional leak vectors like, uh, the war thunder forums. Operation Mincemeat before Sicily is likely what you're thinking of as that was a 'leak' of the entire invasion 'plan', found on a dead 'officer'. Operation Bodyguard before D-Day was more traditional.

That depends entirely whether you're talking from a realpolitik or personal morality perspective though. Most (well... all) countries do so from the realpolitik one or a variation thereof- US domestic political considerations in this case. Trouble with the moral approach is finding a major world leader who hasn't murdered someone, under the definition by which MbS has. His was just more obvious and publicised than others- and let's be frank, if he was not buddy buddy with Trump and Khashoggi didn't work for the WP it would likely have been put down as 'just arab things, what can you do?'. What Biden is effectively saying is that Saudi is far less important to the US than, as just one example, Egypt- whose leader had thousands machinegunned on his direct orders post coup, and despite this Biden has been buddy buddy with at, say, COP27, November 2022- or any other country that has such a leader that the US doesn't criticise, should be fine with being used as a football in US domestic politics and should still do what they're told despite this. And it's mostly so because a climb down from Biden would be... politically embarrassing, domestically. You can't really get past the appearance, certainly if you're MbS, that the US isn't consistent and his main crime was being too pally with Biden's domestic political rival. And of course if the US or west in general applied their stated standards even handedly most of their own leaders would be in jail too, but that goes without saying. Or not.

That's probably the least significant sign that MbS is peeved given that at least is just political theatre so far, with just a semi veiled threat to cut investment. OTOH in practical terms in the past month we've had: Reinstatement of ties with US enemy Iran Reinstatement of ties with US enemy Syria A significant cut in oil production when the US wants the market flooded First ever visit of a Russian warship, returning from... a much criticised (by the US) exercise with US enemies China and Iran If you ran down a checklist of things guaranteed to annoy (but not unduly provoke) the US it would look pretty much exactly like that.

It isn't really appreciation for Russia that informs RSA's position, it's that the ANC really doesn't like the west at all because while we may have been quite loud shouting how reprehensible apartheid was we were busy supporting them, practically, because at least they weren't red. Hence their regime only collapsing once the Cold War was over and they weren't needed any more. Plus really petty crap like Mandela being on a US terrorist watch list until, lol, 2008. As for Bruce... well, maybe majestic will grace you with his Bruce.txt if you ask nicely. Suffice it to say that the only thing Bruce has ever approved of the ANC doing was Cyril Ramaphosa- now President- ordering the police to machine gun strikers at a mine he owned. That, Bruce loved.

I picked it, but I don't think it was the game's fault per se. On the meta side Bioware was completely in their M Night Shylamalan phase with the plot twists for one- Melissan--> Aribeth--> Revan* for their previous three games- and in game they laid it on a bit thick with people observing that your technique had something wrong with it as well, especially since JE was not a long game so you tended to get those observations close together. It was a lot better done than the average Bioware twist was though. OTOH by that point I was heartily sick of the repetitive Bioware trope NPCs and wanted something a bit more than martial arts kotor with Wuxia veneer and SW stuff excised so JE is far from my favourite even among Bioware games. *heh, the Bioware twist was so well established by then that after the first dream sequence in Kotor I restarted with a character named... Darth Revan. Which lead to some funny dialogue later.

Enemies 'winning' in cutscenes having been splattered in gameplay is a bit of a Bioware tradition, see the first encounter with Malak in K1. Hmm, and while I've expurgated most of the game from my memory I'm pretty sure the same thing happens in Jade Empire too, via your 'flaw', though at least that is a more creative and well set up way to deal with it than 'u lose lol'. It's just that Malak (and I can't even remember who the JE main bad guy is except he used to be your mentor) is merely a boring antagonist as opposed to K** L*** who is a charisma singularity that makes everything associated with him worse and worse and worse. Sometimes I even wonder if he's actually a good antagonist he generates such a negative response, but having your playerbase want to take a drill to their frontal cortex in the hope of hitting the bit containing memories of KL is not really ideal, they might hit their memories of Jade Empire instead. OTOH, it's a less annoying fight than Letho v1 in TWitcher2 which is a legitimately difficult fight, that you then... lose by cutscene. Ho hum. On a completely different tack, I am here to spread the Good News about Terraformers. Every once in a while I hit an indie game bought on a whim that makes the money spent on mediocre ones or ones that don't quite work worthwhile; and Terraformers is that game. Just perfectly crafted to my tastes. Basically just a really simple colonise/ terraform Mars tile game, but much like Chess or Go the simple systems result in a whole heap of underlying complexity. 100% unequivocal recommendation to anyone who likes turn based strategy (and, just to be equivocal, doesn't mind there being no (e)X(terminate) in their 4X, and some potential RNG unfairness).

Yeah, my feelings about Midsommar are, hmm. Some sort of combination of its plot feeling soulless and paint by numbers while being very obviously aimed at being quasi arthouse. Kind of like going to an expensive fusion restaurant and being served an expensive and obviously well crafted dish with a lot of thought put into it that doesn't really work as, well, actual food- you've had an experience, a lot of obvious effort has been put in and it isn't bad per se, but it didn't fulfill its actual intended function. I could certainly see how anyone wanting said metaphorical food would find very little to remember about it.

Speaking of Jordan Peele movies I watched Get Out recently during a binge of horror films on Netflix and enjoyed it a fair bit; certainly one of the better 'with social commentary' type horror movies I've seen. Not as good as its reputation maybe, but not far off at all. I also appreciated that it didn't treat you like you were stupid and pretty much told you the set up from the start, if you paid attention. cf Midsommar, which is otherwise fine and really rather nicely shot, acted etc, but where it's blindingly obvious where it's going but you aren't 'supposed' to know it for nearly 90 minutes of film. Binge included The Mist, where I still hate the ending but like everything else apart from the forced stupidity of the pharmacy raid, and the two Quiet Place movies where I should have hated the gimmick but in the end it just worked in practice. I may have to trade in my curmudgeon card as I even liked the Netflix movie whose name escapes me- hmm, Malevolent per my viewed list, guess I like Florence Pugh in horror movies or something; and where even the name suggested mediocrity and forgetableness- and I watched specifically on the basis that it would be an awful but potentially fun train wreck.

That's Macedon and Sparta. Story didn't end particularly well for Sparta either, though that bit tends to get left out (-->--> yet another alliance with Greece's perpetual enemy Persia, this time against the Macedon of Alexander the Great though...) Hawk is old, but pretty reliable. Its problem would be slightly different; that it's demonstrably worse than the old soviet systems Ukraine already has at pretty much anything and everything so doesn't have much of a use case until their old systems are depleted- which I guess could be labelled as a reliability issue, but is really a utility issue. If he isn't gilding the lily for leverage I'd suspect he's referring to a newer system that never got tested properly before seeing action. No speculate on which though.

HEAT round --> penetrator copper jet at 5000ºC --> vapor trail on a cold day. (I don't really know know but I'd say it's fairly safe assumption that's what it is)

Pfft. This is real wrestling acting royalty: stupid marks putting spoilers in the title

At least she said please. Guess she could have threatened to put everyone who ignored her on Myrotvorets instead.

Just more evidence that the radical left has infiltrated the French Police. Indeed, this is the major problem with police today, massive far left wing infiltration and here is the proof! To use an appropriately French phrase "o tempora, o mores!", per the old pirate in the Asterix comics.

Should I bring up Biden voting for the Hague Invasion Act every time someone in his admin says something about hypocritical about the ICC issuing a warrant for Putin? Well no, even I'd start to find that boring after the twentieth time.

I don't think alliances automatically mean someone is a stooge- it has to be someone willing to do something which is primarily in the interests of the other party with either bad consequence or no benefit for their own. So it would be hard to define France as being a stooge of the US since they've had notably different positions in the fairly recent past; otoh Britain frequently puts its own interests behind those of the US while they're both US allies. The thing that would make handing Putin over the act of a stooge is that it would be illegal and thus a terrible way to start for Russia, and under Complementarity a new broom President ought to result in Putin being tried in Russia*. Handing him over at that point would just be to curry favour with the west, it would be actively against Russian interests. *ICC is only meant to step in when the authorities in the country aren't able/ willing to investigate themselves. Which is, of course, why it has such a bad reputation outside the west- it allows western countries to investigate themselves and find themselves innocent because they have 'reliable' judicial systems while African nations, obviously, have unreliable ones if they do the same. And then they tend to look at situations like the Australian SAS murdering civilians in Afghanistan for fun, initiation rites etc which their government knew about for ages and actively tried to suppress information about on grounds of, lol, "national security". But hey, competent and reliable legal system (and to be fair, one person has been arrested, as of yesterday. But he only got arrested after the attempts to suppress everything failed. If they hadn't he'd still be walking around regarded as a hero... and I think the chances of Scott Morrison being arrested for trying to suppress that information aren't exactly high)

Funny, I was sure they initially said they couldn't just take them from army stocks as they'd take nearly as long to prep as to build new (and would have to have a lot of stuff stripped back to export model standard too). Guess it depends what medium to long term means. But yeah, as chilloutman says, still considerably more complicated than the 2A4 for maintenance at least. Ironic that that is one case where more complexity is a big negative.

It's against the Russian Constitution to extradite someone in those circumstances- and not due to Putin, the law was drafted in 1996 under that idiotic, but very much pro western, sot Yeltsin. Would be suitably typical if the first thing the west asked a new broom Russian President to do was to violate their constitution for their benefit. Even worse, it would instantly establish him as a stooge of the west. In this case, probably fair enough though as they're meant to be making the Abrams from scratch, hence the long wait time. Leo1s are, ultimately, a design only 4 years newer than the T-62s people derided Russia for reactivating. Most of the Leo2s are 2A4s, which are 30 years old. They will definitely be less complex.

Funniest thing about the ICC is watching people's heads explode when you point out Senior Senator D-Delaware (a certain Joe Biden) voted for the Hague Invasion Act. That rules based order, eh, Joe.

Yes, Bruce isn't wrong about jurisdiction, he's wrong about ratification* being necessary. Of course Bruce and wrong is a bit of a tautology anyway... Indeed, Ukraine is in the exact same position as Afghanistan, which has an active investigation (well, last time I checked) despite not having ratified either. *And indeed indeed you don't actually require the location/ target country to be a member either. eg the ICC rather tepidly investigating the Brits for the Iraq invasion, since the UK is a member.