Sarjahurmaaja.

"I doubt you'd have that opinion if it was you on the receiving end." Well, from what I've heard the people who were on the receiving end have re-established themselves as a galactic power and their attitude on what took place is closer to "gg" than "I quit". So, maybe you just don't get the game.

So, before you guys get this wonderful thread locked, here's a link to the discussion on EVE Online forums.

Your avatar died.

You have a **** sister. There is no help for that... except one. I'm so not responsible for anything he does.

http://www.omgwtfpwnage.com/eve_article/page-1.jpg http://www.omgwtfpwnage.com/eve_article/page-2.jpg http://www.omgwtfpwnage.com/eve_article/page-3.jpg http://www.omgwtfpwnage.com/eve_article/page-4.jpg So awesome. If I were to play MMORPGs, I guess that'd be the one.

Yeah. It's pretty assholish to just stand by and laugh there if you could help.

"I guess that makes me a 4 in that scale, since I just came back from a week under moderated posting. A 5 means you are banned?" There's moderated posting here? Learn something new everyday, it seems.

Mine go like: *ring* *grunt* <- me "blah blah blah" <- the other guy *grunt* "blah blah blah" *grunt* "blah blah blah" *grunt, hangs up the phone* I don't like them devil machines.

"Perhaps ask someone directly to rate you." But that would be begging, and pathetic. Rate me!

"If enough people try to convince me you are a real poster by rating you, then you get a character sheet." But how will you know they're not a part of the simulation trying to make you believe I am not? How do you know it's not just a trick of the simulation, trying to get in your mind?

"It's borderline, but you were obviously (?) more intent on inciting a response, so I'd put it down to trolling." The prophecy misread, could have been." With the post, yes. Not so much with that particular line. edit: Besides, I was clearly using the synergy bonus for flaming to boost my trolling there. IF I had been doing something like trolling there. Which I clearly wasn't.

"That's trolling, not flaming." I'm accusing you of participating in a circle jerk. That's not a flame?

So, this is a gigantic circle jerk of some kind? (Oh, you lovely Flame skillpoints, what would I do without you?) SIGN ME UP!

"On the issue of his knighthood. I believe the Exile was just about to become a full ranked knight but than the Mandalorian wars came beckoning. He was probably very powerful and just hadn't gone through the Jedi trials yet, and he was good enough to become one of Revan's trusted generals." According to Master Vrook, the Exile was a mediocre student of the Force. Only thing special about him was his innate leadership abilities and him creating Force bonds "willy-nilly".

Blizzard. They said it sucked.

"I'll pass. I like to be able to fall asleep at night in my room without having to leave the light on." Think about it.

See, that would help if you didn't have a tendency to get in arguments with forumers. Arguments that do not progress at all. I know this, for I tried it once. The goggles did nothing, so to speak.

"P.S. Just because something happened in the past doesn't make it irrelevant" Ignorance is Hateful and deceptive bliss!1

"Yeah, But for me HL2 won't install. the third disk is being Difficult and then Steam won't recognize my CD Key." If you paid money for it, you can acquire it through other means without any reasonable ethical restraints, should the copy you received fail to work. Do it.

"Now, Kae has a child and she's exiled for it? Next to Jolee, that seems to be an exceedingly harsh and cruel sentence. So she fell in love and had a child. Big deal. Jolee not only fell in love, he married and taught the force to someone who then couldn't handle it. His crime was far greater, yet he was pardoned? Odd..." Is it really a greater crime? Kae no longer had allegiance to the Jedi after having a child. The child would come before the Jedi - no matter what.

$10 says it will never see the light of the day. Just like WarCraft Adventures.

"Btw, what format is TGA?" Targa.

"Until they improve the console interface to the point of parity with the PC (if and when such a thing might happen). Whilst the console is just ten buttons arranged for optimum twitch reflex, not much in the manner of cogent verbal interaction is possible." This is different in some significant manner from what we get on PCs?

I think reason #1 would have only warranted the deletion of the offending posts. "Dude, you flamed and you got a thread locked. Get over it." Dude, I totally took it into consideration that it might be locked. But locked for reason #2? That's just bad moderation. "Well, since the total abscense of defense, it turned into a flame war at page 3..." Funny that the "flame war" ended one or two posts before the lockdown. Funny.

Since when has it been a reason to close a thread based on the supposed invalidity of one side's arguments? It is almost as if certain mods were using their powers to support their own personal opinions. Discuss.