Lare Kikkeli

i don't know which is funnier, obama getting the prize or american right wing nuts ****ting their pants over it

Rosemarys baby is a pretty damn good movie. I liked the 7th gate, too, although its nowhere near his old work. I like pretty much everything I've seen from him.

or civilized poles

a guinea pig is neither from guinea nor a pig

poor old white man, cant even **** a kid without going to jail anymore also i could make up a theory involving aliens, lizard men, jews and a nazi plot to create a master race (than god he put it up her butt!) with all the facts fitting and it'd be about as plausible as her being an evil temptress who just tried to trick a poor old man.

Alright first of all I don't believe you. In Poland, 13-year old girls rape you? Yeah right. Second of all, anocdotal evicende. Even if thats true it might be a bunch of girls in your neighbourhood, not the whole of Poland and certainly not all over the world. Third, suppose that happened in Poland. What does it have to do with what happened in Jack Nicholsons estate 30 years ago? Nothing, that's what. Albinos get killed for their body parts that get used in witch rituals in africa. By your logic, all albino murders that happened 30 years ago could very well have been witchcraft related. See the logical error here? This has been covered by smarter people than me but I'll say it again: Being white, old & rich shouldn't keep you out of jail for crimes young poor black men go in for the rest of their lives. I know I'm probably an idealist and now some deucebag will lecture me on how the world doesn't work that way & that it is natural so save your breath. If there is any justice in this world Polanski goes to jail.

what im calling you out for is that on the last page you said that polanski should walk even if he did have sex with a minor and you also said that the victims mother or maybe the victim herself is as much to blame for this as polanski is. WRONG! she was 13. a child. do you talk with kids a lot? have you forgotten how naive 13-year olds usually are? obviously you have...otherwise you wouldnt be defending a middle-aged man who had sex with a 13-year old.

rolling with the punches, eh? need i remind you of this post from the last page: here you're saying because he had some pretty bad things happen, because he's directed a few movies and because in some other cases women have yelled rape after having sex we should let polanski walk.

First of all, way to cherry pick quotes PoziomyPion. Who's stating facts here? We're all expressing our opinions on the matter. I believe the girl because she was 13. An over 40-year old man saying a 13-year old girl seduced him? REALLY? Then there's also the fact that not only did Polanski not take it like a man and face the consequences of his immoral actions (with or without the rape), he fled. He ****ing fled the country and was not only not remorseful of what happened, he BRAGGED about it on national television. In light of these facts I believe the girl. Now the only thing you have to say in defense of Polanski is that we have no real evidence. He admitted they had sex, and the girl says she was forced into it. Are you saying most statutory rape cases, or pedophilia for that matter isn't punishable unless there's a video of it? A tape with the victim saying no? How much evidence would you need to put away a man who admits to having sex with a 13-year old but says the child seduced him? Most people in this thread believe he should take responsibility for his actions. Some also believe that in reality he did rape him, but sadly only was convicted of unlawful sex with a minor. I certainly didn't say he deserves to get raped, I only said that he deserves to do the time for his crime, be it rape or unlawful sex with a minor. What are you arguing against again? You sure sound like it, with your talk about no physical evicence. The girl was 13. I repeat, SHE WAS 13.

Yes you are. You're saying we have bias against Polanski. You're saying we should not think he's guilty of what the girl says he did. Thats telling us what to think. There's his word against the girls, and I believe the girl. Why do you belive Polanski? His actions certainly make him look guilty. You don't know he didn't do it. No one except Polanski and the girl do. Ah yes, the age old don't wear a short skirt defense. Now the mom was probably careless to let her daughter in that house, but its in no way her or her daughters fault that a horny old man had sex (possibly raped) with a 13-year old girl. Polanski should take responsibility of what he did, or at the least what he pled he's guilty for.

So you're saying we should be more inclined to believe a man who had sex with a minor and fled the country rather than did time? Who has bragged that he "beat the system" by fleeing the US? To be honest I think he should be sentenced for rape, but at the very least sit the time for the crime he admitted he was guilty of (unlawful sex with a minor).

I think he should serve time just like any other rapist. Money, fame or "having lived a tough life" is no reason not to get punished for drugging & raping someone, much less a 13-year old. And he actually was convicted, not for rape but iirc having unlawful sex with a minor. He pled guilty but fled the country on bail. Thus he deserves to do the time he was sentenced, since he you know, pled guilty and fled. After he's done time I agree that he should pay money to organizations that help rape victims.

Not in Finland, and I'm pretty damn sure nowhere else in the western world. At least not in the circumstances we were in. Two 13-year olds dating and having sex the first time is rape? You can't be serious...

Nah she was 13 as well. So if having sex with a 13-year old is automaticly rape, did we both rape each other?

I know plenty of people, myself included, who had had sex at 13. Is it different because I'm a male? Did I rape my first girlfriend Hiro? Are you calling me a rapist?

"Honest, judge, this six year old girl said she wanted to have sex with me!" "Oh ok then, no rape. You're free to go. Statutory rape is for cowards!" A brick suddenly seems intelligent. In comparison. well, a 6-year old cannot give conscent while a 13-year old can. or so some think, i personally think anyone over 20 having sex with anyone under 18 is an immoral pervert and should get locked away, but im not a judge or a politician so my opinion is moot. but yeah having sex with a 6-year old is not rape, its a different crime (child molestation? unlawful sex with a minor? statutory rape? i'm not sure what the legal term is in english). just like copyright infringement isn't theft

how is supporting universal health care greedy, but not supporting it because you dont want to pay more taxes not? especially when in other countries with universal health care the cost per capita is less than in the states? you fail at logic. oh and its really funny how taks hides behind his ITS NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION-argument. guess what taks, the constitution is nothing more than a piece of paper, an agreement made hundreds of years ago. it's only valid as long as it's useful, and looking at the ****ed up state your country is in its obviously not working for you anymore. you're about as credible as the people who hold the ten commandments as some kind of unbreakable laws. or the quran i guess.

lol @ the americans who'd rather pay more for just their own health care than the same amount or less for their and their neighbours health care. you pay more per capita for health care than any other western country, and you put it in the hands of greedy insurance companies who hold the right to terminate your health care if you get too sick. how stupid can you be? also i love how monte carlo is against all other forms of moderate socialism (reasonable unemployment benefits, public housing, free education) except universal health care BECAUSE UHC saved his son. i wonder how he'd feel about the rest if he were in a postition to either starve or be homeless without them? or if his precious son would need them in the future... thats whats wrong with all these neocon ****, they only think of themselves but the minute they lose their fortunes due to some unforeseen circumstance they start crying for the big brother to bail them out (see: monte carlo, wall street...) oh and taks and whoever it was who was crying about the 13% increase in taxes, guess what, universal health care would mean that your medical bills and insurance costs would eventually go down, thus saving you money in the long term.

Gut Punch Abortion

How is the pricing? There's a monthly fee right?

The veil stuff as a whole felt a bit underdeveloped. I would have liked something more scary than little fat floating bugs to come after you... Not really seeing the JK angle. Keep playing, it manages to mix stuff up quite a bit. I don't know, maybe its just me. I just feel like Raven recycled some design from JK, like the level design of the mine map and some other stuff as well. I guess it just makes me wish for the game to have kickass melee combat and that it was designed around force (Veil) powers like the latter levels of JK.

I c what u did thar. I also finally figured out why I liked Wolfenstein. It's because the game did everything that it wanted to do and did it well. It didn't try too much and fail, Raven played to their strengths and succeeded. Im currently playing through it and while i'm enjoying it I have a few complaints: 1. The visual effect of the Veil mode is way too green. It should have been toned down A LOT. I have no idea how most of the maps look like since everything is the same shade of green with the Veil on. 2. A lot of the game feels like a rehash of Jedi Knight. For real, your Veil powers, the mine map and a lot of other subtle similarities makes the game feel like an unmade sequel to Jedi Knight, only with a different license and without what arguably made JK such a blast, lightsaber combat. Overall the game is pretty fun. I love that occult nazi **** setting and the game while way too easy is strangely satisfying.

Did you try to run the installer and see does it give the option to uninstall? If it doesn't, I guess you need to reinstall Fallout 2 Yeah:

I did install that, and now looking through the readmes theres no mention how to uninstall it. Annoying.

Can't you do damage to anyone, or just people with metal armor? I think there is some weapon damage mod in RP, which changes how bullets work on different armors, meaning basically that you need AP rounds for metal armor. You shouldn't install it if you ask me. 0 to metal armor, 0-2 to leather armor. The 10mm is basically useless, and even the magnum or hunting rifle does 5-8 damage tops. All melee weapons do no damage whatsoever to leather or metal armor. Does this mean if I want the battles to last less than 20 minutes each I need to uninstall the Restoration Project? Thats such a retarded feature that I can't even begin to understand why anyone would think it's a good thing. Make AP make more damage against armor? Sure. Make HP, melee and lower tier small guns in general useless? ****ing retarded.