Tale

A change doesn't mean it has to be their worldview. More interesting than a character in a situation the audience is unfamiliar with is one in a situation the character is unfamiliar with. There's again, growth and change to be had there, even if it's simply becoming comfortable with their environment. The improvement here is that the change makes the character vulnerable. A good character is one you want to see attempt a challenge. And if it's a personal challenge, all the better.

Still on Bravely Default. I'm officially hooked with over 65 hours of play. Though the chapters after 4 seem to be filler material. Decent filler material, in that the enemies are well fleshed out in 6, and the boss fights are challenging in 7. But there's no new areas to go through and the story is excuse driven.

I don't know how I feel about DA:I. I have resigned myself to some combination of "hopeful" and "rent it first." But the idea that I shouldn't even hold that level of interest makes more rational sense to me. I wanted to type here that I've stopped patronizing other developers for less. But in actually giving it thought, I don't know that I have. Assassin's Creed, Call of Duty, Mass effect, and even Dead Space, Dragon Age has not quite sunk to their lows of rehash or not giving a crap. So perhaps I should be more comfortable with my cautious optimism, even if I have written off the other half of the studio making it. Seriously, if you see me in a ME4 thread, it'll only be to make brainless jokes. I guess what I'm trying to illustrate here is that people's opinions and hopes for the game may be complicated.

From the Gearbox article on ars ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH

As long as he's not falling into the haunted nice guy. Maybe he can be a chain smoking womanizer. Or an ambiguously evil eunuch. With a moustache!

I prefer "relevant archetype" to be honest, but it's ultimately variations on a theme. Give the player a consistent set of choices so they can try to be consistent. Especially important in voiced games where the player can't just fill in the gaps between text and delivery. It's a combination of consistency, budget, and console UI design. Most dialogue options aren't choices, they're just opportunities to react and express the character. So the player can pick whether he wants to react as a sarcastic **** or a nice guy like he's been doing all along. I blame voicing the PC. Still not a fan. I can see the motive behind wanting to be cinematic and have voiced dialogue, but it's not worth what you lose. They're still using basic shot-reverse shot for dialogues. It's not worth losing what my imagination can contribute, the expanded word count, or the clarity of knowing what's actually said just so the game can look and feel like a cheap TV show (or the Star Wars prequels).

The basic rule I have for any character is they must try to grow or they must go away. That's my rule 1. Beyond that, the best characters have interesting stories to tell. And I enjoy seeing characters in conflict, ones that speak up their mind about differing opinions on issues they feel are important. I like them to have their own motives that tie into what's going on.

There's a popular quote attribute to Socrates through Plato. The attribution is certainly false. In some brief research, the earliest citation I can find is 1953. But I hope we can agree it is not a sentiment that started there, but is likely one that has gone on for much of history. And that in this constant issue of children experiencing the world wrongly according to their elders, it is a surprise that humankind has not yet gone extinct. Why, I shudder to image what those kids who grew up on rock and roll which made them think the world would be nothing but sex and parties will turn out like. Surely the disaster of their adulthood will be any moment now.

Only speculating, but sometimes it's a regional distribution issue. Regional publishers with their own dates, if ones even been signed yet.

I always find this idea interesting. On one hand, people who engage in offensive behavior see themselves as somehow stronger. On the other hand, they can be seen as people who lack in self-control, which is unquestionably a weakness. And by that same token, people who self-censor can be seen as lacking assertiveness. But being kind and considering others in how you behave is not a weakness. All in all, we should endeavor to be like Vin Diesel or Dwayne Johnson. I hear they're both terrifically nice guys, but you'd be foolish to mistake them for wusses. I'd have a hard time imagine them spurting out passive aggressive insults on message boards. Or even just the regular kind of aggressive commentary.

Same here. DA:O was one of the very last, if not THE last, Origin-free EA games, wasn't it? Dragon Age 2 also released on Steam, but was pulled once the DLC came out. Crysis 2 is on Steam (pulled once, then put back with a DLC bundle). It's an EA partners game. Amalur Reckoning is an even more recent EA partners game.

This is why I hate having to do best or worst. You guys keep reminding me of why I hate other games here. For all my hate of Neverwinter Nights, at least I was able to complete it that one time. Though I had two or three failed attempts that made it to Act 2 before boring me to tears. Two Worlds I had to cheat through or I wouldn't have lasted 3 hours. Two Worlds 2 only lasted as long as it took for me to finally experience the magic system, it's awful. Which of these three is the worst? Find me a six sided die, we'll roll it, and I'll be content with that.

If Trey is to be believed, you can get a girl skin after completing a particular level.

Riiiiiiiiiise So I started The Hero with a Thousand Faces. I'd heard how important influential the work was and my only personal familiarity was wiki summaries. Well, I'm not far into it and I have to say that I have trouble taking seriously any work that counts psychoanalysis among its influences. I'm hoping this changes when we get deeper into the comparative analysis, but if he's going to continue with the idea that these myths are commonly rooted in Oedipal complexes and makes use of dream analysis, I might have to put it down.

I'm kind of with JFSOCC. Shared universes tend to venture into Too Many Cooks very quickly. If some of the actual game writers want to do a tie-in novels, prequels to the games, stuff in other parts of the game setting, I can get behind that so long as they have a really good editor.

I really should have followed NWN1's development. When it came out I still thought I could transfer my Baldur's Gate character. And after it turned out I couldn't, I was further surprised that I couldn't make my character an assassin. It only went downhill from there.

We need more sexy cosplay.

Agreed, we've lost developers that post, but don't gain as many.

Aha! I think I've identified the real problem.

I think Eurogamer specifically mentioned not finding a narrative fork in the hour they had with it. I recall hearing we get a choice between which army we support, Cartman vs the elves, at some point. But I could easily be misunderstanding what I heard a year ago.

I can agree with that. So I'd have to change Too Human to Neverwinter Nights' original campaign.

Too Human was awful and I remember it having progression and loot systems. I don't know if it counts as an RPG, though.

Is it just impressions or are we getting a full embargo lift on reviews?

This is one of those moments where a cane appears and drags someone off stage.

Whatever it is, it better be a thinly veiled reference to colonnades. What's a game about pillars without architecture puns?