Darth Nuke

Is there a Fleet Battle in the Game? I don't want to be spoiled on the details, just a yes or no will be fine.

Does this game share the feel of the movies or the feel of the TOTJ comics?

Is CANDEROUS, MANDALORE?

So does Canderous= Canderous, or does canderous=mandalore?

We knew Candy was alive, but is he Mandalore?

No it's not just you. This chronicle is confusing some of the things that were made clear in KOTOR.

I'm probably reading it the wrong way, but I don't think Master Vodo is gonna be overseeing anything. He's kinda dead. (w00t)

Quite possible

So Malachor isn't a Mandalorian planet. The UK Xbox Mag was wrong. Interesting info though. Kinda makes the Mandalorians seem even more awesome. Only the power of the Sith could be used to defeat them. Well this answers why Malachor V doesn't have any info for the main site. I was wondering last night why Obsidian didn't put the Mandalorian Planet up on the site, now I know. Malachor must be where it all ends.

Actually he said he was the best Basilisk rider other than Mandalore, not the best Mandalorian. According to continuity they didn't see the error of their ways.

Not really. Canderous doesn't have the power to lead a Sector of people. A Mandalore is a symbol of strenght and hope for the Mandalorians, and Canderous just doesn't fit the symbol. He said it himself that he feels that the days of honor and glory were over for him. This shows weakness, and a MAndalore can't afford to be weak. He will only make the Mandalorians weak, not strong.

LOL :D I hope he dies aboard his ship in both light and dark. Personally I enjoyed Admiral Dodonna, hope we get to see her again. But this is interesting, all the KOTOR 1 character are getting high positions: Mandalore=Canderous, Admiral=Carth. What's next, Mission=Supreme Chancellor of the Republic?

I really dislike the idea of Canderous being Mandalore. A follower of Mandaloer, fine, but not the ruler of the Mandalorians. IT's a cliche from hell. I'm sure Obsidian did an excellent job with the story, but maybe they should have thought about some of the ideas that went through their head before making them offical. Such as Canderous being Mandalore, if they would have thought about it, for at least 5 minutes they would know how dumb the idea was.

Actaully it is fact. The dialogue pretty much gives all the info needed, and I see no reason to alter it for interpretation. Mandalore is killed during the Mandalorian Wars. Canderous knows of this, and the Mandalore's death ended the Mandalorian Wars. Revan and Malak find maps, and attack Galaxy. Revan builds HK-47. Hk is sent to Mandalore Space and is defeated by New Mandalore New Mandalore sends Mandalorians to Kashyyk to test weapons that were used against them in the Mandalorian Wars. I see no problem

Really that's just arrogant it's not proven fact. Indirectly you are saying despite the fact then when I played the game I saw it differently to you that my perception is wrong and so is anyone else that saw it like me. Proven fact my ass Nuke, I am not saying you don't know your stuff you definetly do but you are drawing factual conclusions on limited information that can be otherwise interpreted - not to twist it around for disagreement fun - but simply because when I played before any of such discussions was that it all happened pre-Kotor. The only facts we have are a) HK-47 was constructed when Revan and Malak began there war on the Galaxy We can argue this all day, When did they began that is purely a status of opinion, wiping out the Mandalorians could well have just been a step in that war for Revan. The Dark side is not traditionally up front about such things, Revan didn't send a memo to the Republic saying "I have began my war against you today, I have the following planets marked for ass kicking, Kind regards the New Dark Lord of the Sith" b) A datapad on Kashyyk mentions the Mandalore and those fighting you seem to be in service to him. Now I could be mistaken but that message didn't came with a date now did it? I also envisioned that group some lost platoon of warriors stuck on some remote contact doing what they were told on the bottom of some forest sticking to there last orders. If you go through my e-mail without dates, you'd get some weird impression about whats going on in my life because I dont have any personal e-mails there newer than 4 months old. They were just last orders to a lost force in my mind. Could I have been wrong sure, I might still be wrong, but it aint becuase there are some facts proving me wrong, there just no there yet. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Your making it harder then it is. The info clearly states a Mandalore is around during KOTOR. HK-47 said he was built after when Revan and Malak began their conquest of the Galaxy. Your interpreting it, I'm not. It's clear HK was created when Malak and Revan began their Sith War after the Mandalorian Wars. Canderous said the War was over and that Mandalore was killed in the Mandalorian Wars. Yet that's the Mandalorian Wars, not the Revan War. So it's very clear. And again your looking to much into it with the Kashyyk Datapad. There is no reason to suspect that the Mandalorian is talking about anyone other than the Lord Mandalore.

Being wrong is no problem. Being wrong will make me happy to know that the Mandalore from KOTOR hasn't been forgotten, good for me.

Whatever, but there was a Mandalore in KOTOR. Proven FACT. You can twist it or alter it to fit the way you like, but the actual continuity says a Mandalore was around during KOTOR. I have watched Akari lurk for a while now, and since he's not going to join the fun, I'll just wait and see. Or should I say come back when I finally confirm that the KOTOR Mando has been forgotten.

You don't need anymore facts. HK was built after the Mandalorian Wars, Revan killed Mandalore to end the Mandalorian Wars. IT even describes this pretty well in the bio. So if Revan killed A Mandalore to end the Mandalorian Wars, and HK was built and faught a Mandalore after the Mandalorian Wars. Then it's clear a new Mandalore was around. If not that then the Kashyyk datapad does the deed.

It has been confirmed. If the Mandalore in KOTOR was still around, then the Mandalorians who became mercs,bounty hunters, and raiders would instead be with their leader. KOTOR says many, but not ALL, stayed and became those things. The bio hints that all did, because there was no Mandalore until around the time of KOTOR 2(who is, Canderous, it's no spoiler, it's Canderous).

For 7 years before the Mandalorian wars, the Mandalorians held recruiting drives, conquered world increasing supplies, and training. Not to mention I'm sure not every Mandalorian from the Mandalore Sector faught for Ulic, I'm sure Mandalore left a good size army to defend the sector.

Don't need to play game, bio has already decided the fate of the Mandalore from KOTOR. See in KOTOR 2 the Mandalore SHOULD be the one from KOTOR, but instead it's the guy who isn't worthy of the title(CLICHE,CLICHE,CLICHE).

Clearly there was a known Mandalore in KOTOR, becuase he was already sending Mandalorians to to deed like test weapons. Oh and if you listen to Jagi he says he tells the REMAINING CLANS of the battle between him and Candy Cane. Candy so far has said their was no Mandalore, when there was, and he said the Clans were all gone, when they weren't. As long as their is a Mandalore, the Mandalorians will follow him.

Obsidian people wrote the story, they are to blame. It's clear now that reading every Star Wars Novel, playing every game, reading every comic, doesn't mean you know everything about Star Wars. Clearlykeeping ingame continuity wasn't that big a deal. Oh,and the Mandalorian Wars happening after the Exar Kun War, make no problems.

There is no way around it. There are now 2 Mandalore's.

Both HK and the Mandalorian writing in the Datapad have no reason to lie. HK lie would have been him saying that he actually killed the lord Mandalore. And the Mandalore in the Datapad has even less of a reason, for his thoughts are his own.