Sand

My next video card is going to be a Nvidia GeForce 8600. I want to go SLI with an affordable DirectX10 card.

Just wait for DirectX 11.

Indeed, J.E.. Hell, the US have done its share of putting dictators into power. The US government would rather have a ruthless dictator aligned with them than a democratically elected government against them.

Well, I found an AMD 5200+ X2 for $175 at Newegg. It is a 2.6 Ghz dual core. The e4300 is only 1.8 dual core.

Of course I am right. I am always right, except in rare cases that I'm not.

Yes, but they are so expensive.

They look kind of lame.

I didn't like the first one so I haven't seen the 2nd and have no interest in seeing the 3rd.

There's nothing wrong with 2D and it should remain 2D. This would force the developers to work on a great story and not be fixated by lame 3D graphics. O NOES! We have to make this tree look as realistic as possible. Yes, there is something wrong with 2D. Its not marketable.

Azarkon gets it. If you are to interfere it requires thought, precision, and a delicate hand, not with guns blazing. If you cannot make the situation better then it is currently it is best not to act and interfere. Of course Volourn would say that the invasion did make things better, but I wholly disagree. We have billions of US dollars lost in that sinkhole, thousands of Americans dead for nothing, let alone hundreds of thousands Iraqis dead, injured, and/or missing due to sectarian violence which the US military has been completely inept to stop. Also this sectarian violence between the Sunnis and Shiites threaten to spread over in other Middle Eastern countries, totally destabilizing the region. How is that better, Volourn? Bottomline, it isn't. The invasion didn't make the Middle East more peaceful and stabile. It made it worse.

So, that means you have the right to interfere what goes on in another country? I don't think so.

Hardly, Volourn. My view is this. The United States government is responsible to US citizens, as Canadian government is responsible to Canadian citizens, as the Iraqi government is responsible to the Iraqis.

It doesn't matter that Iraq had WMDs in the past. The point is that Iraq nad no WMDs when we invaded and none were found.

That sounds like a medical problem.

The difference is that I don't go off bother other people. If people ask I tell, but beyond that I leave people alone. EDIT: With the exception of posting on this forum...

I do see a lot of different colors, but when it boils down to it there is only right and wrong. I live my life on what I think is right and what I think is wrong. Sometimes that meshes with the world, and sometimes it doesn't but I deal with what comes at me as it comes at me. If you are sure of your convictions, steadfast in your beliefs, then you have the power to shape the world around you than be shaped by the world.

YAY! Someone likes my idea!

Those who are proven to be our enemies deserve no less. If they are aligned with our enemy then they should face the same fate. If they surrender we should accept such surrenders graciously. Al Qaeda. They claimed responsibility and the Taliban backs Al Qaeda. No, but if we are going to use a large amount of resources, then we need to make sure that those resources are well spent and the returns are worth it. So far Iraq has proven to be a failure.

Why not 3D? 3D is a whole lot better nowadays than the day of the original Fallouts and the Infinity Engine games. Also with NWN2 camera style you can emulate the Isometric view. Besides, even Van Buren was going to be 3D or have you not messed with the old VB that Black Isle was developing yet?

Its bloody snowing outside! BLOODY SNOW! AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

Tactics.

Could be-s and probablies don't cut it when it comes to justifying an invasion another country, Walsh. There has to be a 100% certainty that country is a clear and present danger to the US, capable of attacking US citizens on US soil, to justify an invasion. That is why I had no problems when we invaded Afganistan. Al Qaeda and the Taliban government made an direct attack on the US. We should have focused on them til not a single member of Al Qaeda or Taliban was left alive. To use our Idiot President's words we should have "stayed the course" but we didn't. Al Qaeda is gaining strength, the Taliban is back, and what gains we have had in the region is eroding. All because our Idiot President couldn't "stay the course."

What I would do to make Fallout 3 is use an engine similar to NWN2 but have true 3D movement to allow jumping, climbing and swimming. Have a toggle between Turn Base combat and Continual Turn Base combat as was in Fallout Tactics. I would also allow crouching and prone positioning as well. Give the game a full gore setting so we can keep the lovely death animations but in truly gruesome lifelike 3D glory. Then make the game's baseline difficult be along Stalker's difficulty level.

Or that he is so gulliable that he bought Bush's lies hook, line, and sinker. Also, Volourn, I was against this war long before the media jumped in against Bush.

What so basically in the same game engine? Of course. really hoped you wasn't going to say that. It wouldn't be Fallout if it didn't use the classic engine. It wouldn't be marketable either.