Fighter

One good thing from this is how well it filters who the unsalvageable **** are. We have a "SJW" definition thread here. Well if you throw a hissy fit and reach straight for the mysoggyknees over a guy who literally says nothing at all about gender politics you're an SJW. It is the quintessential example of going after someone without demonstrable cause and seeing a problem where no evidence exists to support such interpretation.

He isn't only the original 'angry' reviewer but one of or the original 'nostalgia' reviewers.

I didn't think there was anyone who's into games and didn't know AVGN. He even made a movie from community donations. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2123146/?ref_=nv_sr_1

The 'hate' for the trailer wouldn't exists if not for the back and forth around it. I don't think that was his goal.

So what's the truth about 'no go zones' in Sweden? The supposed places so flooded with immigrant gangs police can't deal? It sounds pretty ridiculous. Basically parts of Sweden have been conquered and colonized by foreigners.

The Daeneris plot is just retreading it's own story. We have already seen this at the end of season 1 and it's almost exactly the same. And it's lost its zing by now seeing her yet again achieve everything through a dicey stunt that should not work more than once. But then SOIAF always felt like two different books.

Nothing he wrote says "Give money to the rich". Unless you think letting people keep the money they made is "giving it to them".

This is what SJWism is in its ultimate form. Hilarious but sad that these people have power over anything. youtube Warning: Swearing.

I've played the BF4 campaign. It has cringe worthy writing. I was going to drop it but then it ended.

At best they are the 'feel good' internet slacktivists who unfortunately can do real damage. Multiple people who lost their jobs over non-issues like innocent jokes come to mind. See: Tim Hunt. At worst they are a communist cult.

Well SJW are after removing statues these days.

The biggest crime is how boring that dialog seems. I bet they don't give you any choice to engage with the subject at all. They want to make a progressive point but are probably too afraid to write anything with any real bite. To give the player something to think about other than, "This is the correct thing to think". I bet they could get a lot more respect if they would engage the player with a dialog and not just try to give them a diversity seminar.

Yeah I get that. It's just a thought. No one wrote some article titled "Skyrim modding community has a problem" or the like.

Yeah I'm not a fan of the skimpy armors either,

First I'm not talking about adult mods necessarily as not everything sexualized is considered adult content. And second you're wrong, true adult mods are very easy to find. They are all over Nexus which is where all of the normal mods are.

I wonder why no one went after the Skyrim modding community. All those curvy and "unrealistic" female body replacement mods and skimpy armors.

I remember reading the initial news and was surprised this was even an issue. Things get hacked all the time and by people with far less resources than a government.

Shtora cannot stop TOW-2 or Kornet (some of which the rebels/ISIS may still have). The way it works is by mimicking the light the missile emits by seeing which the launcher optic keeps it on course. But TOW-2 has a xenon light which blinks in a coded pattern and Kornet is laser guided. The missile in T-90 video is TOW-2A. Also the Syrian T-90 are the 1992 version which has lower protection than newer variations but its front armor and reactive armor is still a lot to overcome.

I am open to alternatives. But the only alternative I see on the table is something seen in a Mad Max movie.

^ Airstrikes against ISIS will continue: Click. As far as what Russia should do as an ally. Well who is the military expert here to say how much exactly is necessary? I think after the US trying to destroy Taliban and... well ISIS for many years now everyone would have learned a lesson about realistic expectations. EDIT: Also this was said by Putin last October aparently: "Our goal: to stabilize the lawful authorities and create conditions for a political compromise".

Some people may not want to admit this but Assad's regime intact is more damaging to ISIS future than anything. Because if the "democratic rebels" win and the country will turn into a wasteland ruled by warring factions covered in sh*t, blood, and sharia tyranny. As everyone knows it would. That's when ISIS would thrive the most.

Everyone about this issue is being obtuse for some reason. Russian airforce is not leaving Syria. Only some of the ground units that weren't doing anything (at least officially). It's a political move that is not going to change anything. The militants are no longer advancing and closing in on Assad's strongholds, his removal by force is no longer on the table. So as far as "what was achieved". What was supposed to be achieved realistically? Russia should have gone all in trying to hold Syria together on the ground like US did in Iraq & Afghanistan? Because that ended well and achieved lots... I don't like Putin but I have to pat him on the back for not getting bogged down in anything like that (yet).