Ben No.3

Oh no

And who are these mysterious masters? Bilderberg? Nazis? Wall Street? Zionists? Aliens? Lizards? Sesame Street? Scrooge McDuck?

First, german right extremist soldier tries to fale Muslim terror attack. Then, London. And according to independent, some Muslim girl got beaten up in Virginia. Tide's turning

We have it legal around here.

"For example one of the early ones where you described slapping womens asses in your factory, so I can absolutely say I consider you homophobic, sexist and racist. You are bigot but that doesnt mean we cant have debates. Frankly I cant care to pass Internet SJ opinions anymore" So what, kill the bourgeois scum? Brucie, how does ones low treatment of women make one a racist or an homophobe?

Really? A guy who have blackouts and sometimes is so stoned he doesn't remember what he posted a page earlier claims to have photographic memory? That's Rich Well Bruce I remember how you said that: a) you supported Apartheid when I asked you up front was A. a good thing. And that you regret you couldn't live in that period. b) you go on radio shows to tell black people how they should think and what their opinions should be and to explain to them how wrong they are and how they should just "trust you and listen to you" or any other white guys. c) you only date strippers, especially human traffic victims foreign strippers, because they are vulnerable and you can exploit their desire to escape their life. d) you hate Milo Yiannopoulos because not only he have opposing views but he's gay. e) you provided drugs to your underage niece and throw her on the streets because she refused to "be with you". So excuse me if I will just laugh at your insinuations about me, because frankly there are numerous posters here that throw up a little every time they see your nickname. Wait wait wait what? Brucie has been a bad boy? Please do tell me more

Hello, newbie here as well. You should have a blasts here! I have a feeling a lot of future disappointment is building up

Hi

How's that funny

Come on Ben. We both know that's not true neither morally nor legally.Would you employ such a person in the White House? To me at least, "extremism" implies something more grave than internet posts. I think there's an important difference between a radical and an extremist; a radical has ideas or acts in ways that are very different from the norm, an extremist has similarly radical ideas but acts against the norm (for example through terrorism).Ok. I understand. Going by those definitions you are right.

[senseless attacks, nvm]

Come on Ben. We both know that's not true neither morally nor legally.Would you employ such a person in the White House? To me at least, "extremism" implies something more grave than internet posts. I think there's an important difference between a radical and an extremist; a radical has ideas or acts in ways that are very different from the norm, an extremist has similarly radical ideas but acts against the norm (for example through terrorism).

What are you talking about? Security departaments have grown in the last couple of years. There are more agents and private contractors hired recentlt then there was all agents in the cold war era. So your argument doesn't pass the smelling test pal. The fact that there are private contractors is reason enough to not trust those people with any more power. Now we know there is little to no vetting process for them. I wouldn't trust that Reality Winner on the sole basis of her idiotic name. Yet she has been hired and granted access to vital secrets when a brief look at her twitter and Facebook account shows she is clearly a leftist extremist. who is she and what did she do? E: looked it up. Is being anti-Trump left extremism now? Nvm tho, let's rather enjoy this alliance Wanting to burn down the White House and sympathizing with terrorists is extremism.People say crazy sh*t online. Important is what they actually do, and last time I checked, the White House was standing.

What are you talking about? Security departaments have grown in the last couple of years. There are more agents and private contractors hired recentlt then there was all agents in the cold war era. So your argument doesn't pass the smelling test pal. The fact that there are private contractors is reason enough to not trust those people with any more power. Now we know there is little to no vetting process for them. I wouldn't trust that Reality Winner on the sole basis of her idiotic name. Yet she has been hired and granted access to vital secrets when a brief look at her twitter and Facebook account shows she is clearly a leftist extremist. who is she and what did she do? E: looked it up. Is being anti-Trump left extremism now? Nvm tho, let's rather enjoy this alliance

Those are all good points but if you're living in a society that corrupt then they don't need your DNA to "get you". Also, the pattern of your DNA existing in a database does not provide anyone with the actual physical DNA.@ Sharp_one I can understand your concern but dont confuse corruption and incompetence that exists within the police force where you live as a global standard. This wont be used to frame innocent people I can assure you I side with Sharp. Brucie, it doesn't even have to never illegal or attached to corruption if people buy your data. Remember the NSA spying on you? Remember that law that your browsing history can now be bought and sold? Same thing, Brucie. Would you be comfortable with that? That people can essentially buy who you are? "This won't be used to frame innocents"... how can you possibly ensure that? Bennie the NSA is our friend, they are an invaluable instrument in the war against extremism There decisions need to be accepted in the interests of the greater good, You did not answer the question. You did also not give valid reasons as too why we should accept the NSA in its current state, aside from "they're good because they told me they were". Bennie there are people in this world who have worked for decades in government security departments who you must admit will know more than you about real threats countries face. This is based on accurate and quantifiable intelligence and information gathering using numerous sources and mediums such as? I don't doubt that there are people who want to help. But tell me, what exactly will stop those who are only acting in self interest? What guarantees you that the incredible power you want to give these people does not get abused? Furthermore, what will stop these vast amounts of information of getting commercialised; open for business as our browser data was just now? What guarantees me that the informations gained will not be used against me because I pissed of the wrong people? These are important questions and you cannot answer one of them in any satisfactory way. Don't ever trust anyone with power over you. Tell me, Brucie, aside from them telling you that they only have your best interest in mind, how exactly do you know that they actually do? How can you possibly know that you can trust them?

Bruce is a perfect target for Nigerian prince scam e: Me stupid

Those are all good points but if you're living in a society that corrupt then they don't need your DNA to "get you". Also, the pattern of your DNA existing in a database does not provide anyone with the actual physical DNA.@ Sharp_one I can understand your concern but dont confuse corruption and incompetence that exists within the police force where you live as a global standard. This wont be used to frame innocent people I can assure you I side with Sharp. Brucie, it doesn't even have to never illegal or attached to corruption if people buy your data. Remember the NSA spying on you? Remember that law that your browsing history can now be bought and sold? Same thing, Brucie. Would you be comfortable with that? That people can essentially buy who you are? "This won't be used to frame innocents"... how can you possibly ensure that? Bennie the NSA is our friend, they are an invaluable instrument in the war against extremism There decisions need to be accepted in the interests of the greater good, You did not answer the question. You did also not give valid reasons as too why we should accept the NSA in its current state, aside from "they're good because they told me they were".

Those are all good points but if you're living in a society that corrupt then they don't need your DNA to "get you". Also, the pattern of your DNA existing in a database does not provide anyone with the actual physical DNA. @ Sharp_one I can understand your concern but dont confuse corruption and incompetence that exists within the police force where you live as a global standard. This wont be used to frame innocent people I can assure you I side with Sharp. Brucie, it doesn't even have to never illegal or attached to corruption if people buy your data. Remember the NSA spying on you? Remember that law that your browsing history can now be bought and sold? Same thing, Brucie. Would you be comfortable with that? That people can essentially buy who you are? "This won't be used to frame innocents"... how can you possibly ensure that?

This is superb

Whats wrong with that? Surely if you not breaking the law it wouldn't be a problem ? please tell me your being ironic? It means that I am investigated against when I am literally as innocent as can be (since I was just born!) what about innocence until proven guilty? No?

This is perfectly understandable considering the terrorist threat Germany faces, you should be grateful Bennie....you young people nowadays, very ungrateful for everything you have "Don't worry Bennie. Big Brother is a brother after all". https://youtu.be/_toRV6ziOYg Do you agree with this Brucie? Then tell me you sweet summer child, how should a child ever develop a critical mind?

Germany's ministers just decided to not only allow police to tap into private messaging apps (up until now it was only phone calls and classical messaging), but also decided to take the fingerprints of all refugees as young as 6 years. Some freedom.

Yes and yes. Feuerbach had an interesting notion that man created God rather than than the reverse. That people see good in themselves and project it outwardly in our minds as coming from a benevolent supreme being. Not a theory I'd buy into myself.There's more to it. The idea that man created god, more specifically, an image of God, is shared both. Their reasoning is different. Feuerbach assumed that religion is in a way like a tool to make philosophical progress easier: The god(s) created by a specific society are a projection of the state of the human mind. "Outsourcing" that makes it simpler to reflect about it. There's also a development... for example, Greek and Roman gods are representatives of certain characteristics, Christianity then is representative of human ideals. Freud saw more of a parental thing, of course. According to him, we long for a sense of all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good protection that we had in earliest childhood from our father (or rather, we perceived that we had it). This need is deeply ingrained, and especially if you were brought up to be religious, Freud thinks that you will project this imagine of your father into god during adolescence and after, as you get more independent and as you realise that your father can in fact not do all of this. Mind you, although implying gods non-existence, it does certainly not prove it.

Do you know Feuerbach? Or Freud, for that matter?

Hi there