Playing devil's advocate is hardly "being dishonest."
The mere fact that different countries have different laws for the various different ways for people to take the life of another human being, including situations where it is acceptable to take the life of another human being, proves that it's not a simple issue.
It gets even more muddied up when different countries agree on different recourse for retribution for the crime.
Laws get redefined ALL the time. For instance, there is no crime known as "rape" in the Canadian Justice System. This is because rape had certain associations, requiring sexual penetration, attached to it, and they felt that a "rape" crime was far too narrow in scope. We now have varying degrees of "Sexual Assault" depending on the various factors associated with the sexual assault. It was also at this time spousal protection was enforced, because until then (early 80s) it was impossible for the legal system to recognize that a husband could rape his wife under the rape law. A whole slew of changes came at that time regarding sexually related crimes.
But yeah, before 1980, it was perfectly okay for a husband to rape his wife, and good ol' Hades supports it 100% because there's no Law preventing it!