SAS better than Delta Force/ SEALS
Frankly I suspect that most SAS men would argue they were better in their role as all-round special ops for four reasons:
- They have a selection process that looks predominantly at other things than physical strength (without making them weedy)
- They see far more, and far more varied action, developing their ability to be creative and versatile
- The strategic and operational control of the SAS is far clearer and more professional than Delta and the SEALS, who have suffered in the past from interference from high commanders.
- Historically, all US operations have suffered due to all services trying to get a piece of any strategically significant or newsworthy action.
But the SAS would also acknowledge that US kit is superior, from boots to rifles to dedicated submarines. Moreover I don't think either side would relish taking on the other, beyond a grim satisfaction that people could then stop asking the same damn question of who is better.
~~~
As for nobodies...
I'm not saying anyone doesn't matter. I'm just saying (see the hegemony thread) that someone would be doing it if not for them. So relax and let them have their fun.