I know nothing about hockey? That's a pretty lame shot, considering atleast I kept my arguments to the topic not about whether or not you had a clue what icing even was.
I'm not sure what other stats you want me to present you. You say I didn't "compare and contrast", well I told you where he finished in scoring (118th place), so that is a good "comparison" to point totals of other players in the league.
Shooting percentages mean nothing. Take a look at guys like Pavel Bure's shooting percentages. His shooting percentages were always between 10 to 15%, which never was close to leading the league, yet when he was healthy he was considered one of, if not THE best snipers in the league.
+/- is also a weak stat to judge a player because you have to take into account the situations they're placed in. A defensive forward will likely have a worse +/- than a scorer because they're on the ice against the other team's top line.
And a mediocre player, IMO, is an average player. Perhaps I should have used "average" instead, since you seem to want to ignore the FACTUAL STATISTICAL evidence I presented and instead latch on to the word mediocre. So instead, use whatever word you want to describe a player that is a decent, average NHLer, but way past his prime as a "great" player.