Volourn

Nope. Lebron James will still be the MVP.

Just as impressive, he had zero turnovers. Not bad cosndiering how much he has the ball. he should be MVP since points seem to impress people too much even though the true MVP is LeBron james. Also, Durant is no MVP. his team played without him and still won by nearly 20 points. L0L

He did outplay him. Brodeur had the better team.

Mine: 1) Miami 1 million) Everyone else. MIA doesn't give a crap about RS. Until someone beats MIA in a best of 7 playoff series, they're trying to be 2nd best. It's why a team like Indiana is DESPERATE for home court advantage. They actually have the fantasy notion that it'll make a difference in the playoffs versus MIA. L0LZ For the record, MIA has basically the same record they had at this time last season. Meaningless.

This hurts Denver's chances. But,t he fact the game isn't played in Seattle hurts that team's chances.

Nash shouldn't have even won one MVP.

So... jealousy. K.

Nash is a fraudient MVP two times over! The good thing about him he suckered LA to pay him for doing absolutely nothing. L0L

Krappy chokes again! Wilson will need to play like he did in 2nd half if Seattle wants to beat Denver. Seahawks will have to prove they don't need the '12th man' to win games. I'm just glad SF gets stuck being a bridesmaid yet again. HAHAHA! I want to Denver to win for Peyton but I could live with a SEA win.

Disagree. he was the main character. It's success was 90% of the character. This should be undisputable. Afterall, 2 other movies wer emade for the character not other characters. Case closed. I actually don't think the 2nd film was all that horrible. It wasn't all that great either. Then again, Pitch Black was overrated to start with.

Brady and the Pats choke again! When are they gonna win again!?! Also, in the playoffs, Brady and Manning are even at 2-2 so all things are equal since we know RS doesn't matter. RIGHT, DAN MARINO, RIGHT!?!

K.

"Don't get me wrong, Hollins is a good coach but he was a bad fit with Pera's approach and he went out of his way to make sure everyone knew about it. " Then, perhaps, he shouldn't have hired the coach in the first palce. Afterall, don't teams research coaches before hiring them. LMAO

D-wade didn't sacrifice anything. He is Lebron's 'sidekick' because Lebron is simply the better player. None of those other players would have had a chance to even step up if Lebron wasn't on the team. He makes his team better. Guys like Battier are nothing, Allen is a one dimensional 3 pint shooter past his prime, Bosh is a greta player who led a crappy team while Lebron dragged a crappy Cavs team to the finals, Wade won his one pre Lebron championship on the coattails of the bestc enters yet somehow gets all the credit for it despite the fact as soon as Shaq broke down the Miami team became crap. The coach is 'flexible' means he is doing the smart thing - basing his team's plans around their best player. Any coach worthy of coaching should know to do that. Anyone who claims KD or any other wannabe is better/more valuable than Lebron is smoking some rather silly drugs.

You can quote all the silly stats yiu want, Lebron is the better player and more valuable to his team. Without Lebron, Miami is lucky to be a playoff team let alone two time champion. With or without KD, OKC is still a no time winner and we all saw what happens to OKC when they lose their true MVP last year in the playoffs. It is ludicrousd that people are stil trying their best to pretend that Lebron is not the best player in the game. L0L

No way should anyone get MVP but Lebron. But, you are right. the voters won't want to give him a 3rd straight plus they likely feel it's a way to punish him for his 'evilness'. KD is good but he (and nobody else) is at Lebron's level. Plus, I'd argue that KD may not even be the MVP of his own team as shown in last year's playoffs. And, his points aren't hat impressive considering how much of a ball hog he is and how he pretty much shoots the ball all the time. Lebron averages 25ish points with less shots. 8*hrug*

"HAHAHA wow. Are you serious? Scorcese is adored by hollywood. That won't be why either won't win if they don't." Yeah, he may be but the movie is mixed. There's half who love it while the other half think it's filthy garbage that seeks bestow sainthood on its bad guy main character. Which is so ridiculous - especially considering the previous movies that have even worst main characters than Belfort. I mean, a movie was praised when its main character liked to eat human flesh. LMAO And, no, Dicaprio was definitely a dark horse nominee here. In most prediction he wans't in the top 5 but the movie did gain momentum hardcore. And, chances are the film itself got nominated because up to 10 pics can be. And, you only need 5% of #1 votes to get it. It's not ahrd to imagine Wolf having 5% of supporters, but I don't see it or Dicaprio winning even if they should. P.S. Meshugger, his acting is ALWAYS Oscars worthy. He should be AT LEAST a 12 time winner!

It says a lot when it is the young new star filled teams that are the ****y ones while the teams out west play the solid PC game.

Look at that. The horrible King gets ANOTHER shutout. R00fles!

"oh, come on... Jennifer Lawrence doesn't even look the part, she was so out of place in it she's a good actress, but there's no comparing them really, different leagues." Nice try. Lawrence is the best actress/actor in that movie. Period.Her scenes got the majority of the reactions/attention from the theatre audience. Quite frankly, Adams got outacted by the clothes she was wearing. L0L "Matthew McConaughey is a shoe in for the Oscar. Dicaprio will lose again." Yeah, probably, but that is just because the Academy has proven to be braindead hence Gravity's multitude of underserved noms.

"Matthew McConaughey is the one who deserves a Best Actor Oscar this year the most" No, he's a wannabe compared to DiCaprio. It should be a two way tie between Leo Dicaprio and Leo Dicaprio. Amy Adams was good in Hustle but she wasn't even the best female performer in her own movie. EPIC FAIL.

The only thing that matter to me were the Wolf and Dicaprio nominations. Too bad neither will win because of old farts and ignorance.

"Noone's saying he's bad" "no rings for lundqvist still means he's garbage. " Why are you lying? Go to any hockey/Ranger focused board as well, and all you hear about how 'Lundqvist sucks', 'Lundqvist injury prone', 'Lundqvist broken down', 'Lundqvist is overpaid', 'Lundqvist should be traded', 'Lundqvist was a cheater cause he can't play with smaller pads', 'play the rookie he has better stats (even though he plays against weaker opponents lmao) etc., etc. These are the same garabge 'fans' who were sucking his b00bs ptreviously. Youa re no different. I'd rather have Ludnqvist 'at his worst' than majority of goalies 'at their best'. Lundqvist is the best. Period.

Oh, you are one of those. No rings = garbage? That's beyond nonsense. And, anyone with any knowledge of teams sports realize that. But, hey, I know youa re just trolling. Not surprising with a name like Krappie.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=700428&navid=nhl:topheads Yeah, the King is 'so horrible' that he is name a Three Star of the Week. People who are wishy washy 'fans' are really sad individuals.