Jump to content

Nartwak

Members
  • Posts

    1891
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nartwak

  1. "Shrill" isn't a noun. Also: Your links don't work.
  2. Jane, you ignorant ****, don't discuss subjects you can't understand.
  3. That is Bao Dur. He's a Zabrak and his character class is Tech Specialist.
  4. I suspect as much. There was a dev post that stated the 'Mandalore' character didn't always come in Chrome. Or somesuch. Don't start with a specious premiss. You won't come to any accurate conclusions.
  5. Winter Sora.
  6. Maher is fantastic.
  7. jaguars4ever wins the thread!
  8. Well fine then.
  9. Yes. :D
  10. I'm soundly impressed by your appeal to authority. I actually vomited on myself in admiration! Read: Please include a cite for your thesis.
  11. You're speculating. A church is not required for a state to commit religious persecution. See also: Soviet Union
  12. Bull**** It works both ways.
  13. Thousands of years actually. I get your point Dakoth, it's part of their social perogative. I'm saying that with regards to the working of our federal government, all marriage ceremonies performed by religious figures or those civil unions performed by Judges or those provided by common law are equal legally. I'm just sayin', I don't think that homosexuals entering into civil unions, or those married by religions with provisions for them, undermine any religion's authority to declare a union sacred or profane as according to the tenants of its dogma.
  14. With regards to the government, it's just a contract. Judges can oversee the process with equal legal authority. When homosexual marriage was 'legalized' in SF the couples went to... Besides which, some Churches have reinterpreted their dogmas to include the practice. Good job there. I wish I lived in that universe.
  15. Laozi turned this thread from to .
  16. Oh, yeah I see that. My guilt overshadowed your words. As to a chat box; I think it's hard to enforce moderation, and that physically monitoring it would tie up an overproportionate amount of time. So... nay.
  17. Were you being sarcastic? If so, I tell ya, you're gonna have to work on it. By the by, you're welcome; but you shouldn't be so kind as to thank me.
  18. That's entirely too polite of you. *sigh* I wasn't offended so much as I am just a assface anyways. I apologize and am sorry I was rude to you. I was entirely out of line.
  19. How about you post suggestions where they belong?
  20. Thanks. I think I'll let the "your kind-my kind" dichotomy you put forth speak for my assessment of you.
×
×
  • Create New...