Meshugger

Have you stopped beating your girlfriend? lol

So what is your solution here? An open panel discussing these three questions would be a start.

Has this been posted? http://www.cbsnews.com/news/orlando-shooting-omar-mateen-texted-wife-during-massacre/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab7e&linkId=25633428

I presume he means that any indictment would be politically blocked. Get the federal prosecutor to decline to prosecute? Say that the emails are inadmissable since they were obtained illegally? Claim any incriminating emails were planted by hackers? I'm sure they could come up with something. You'd kind of hope that even a recommendation to indict would kill off a presidential candidates chances, so maybe something prior to recommending an indictment... There are certainly plenty of people who'd happily spike the investigation for political reasons. In any case, not like Wikileaks has actually released anything yet. Except chemtrails, I hear reliably they're up to their necks in that little attempt to mass medicate the world clandestinely. Why else would Assange spend all his time inside, hmm? Unless he was trying to avoid the chemtrails! Quod erat demonstrandum. Who knows? Sometimes we all fall into the trap of thinking that all parties involved are acting upon the objectively most optimal, sound or most rational model and make such decisions thereafter....which in fact doesn't happen so often.

Maybe for the same reasons that the Russians still haven't released the rest of the deleted emails that they stole: bargaining power. Hmm? Assange says they're just getting the stuff processed and it will be released. He's not bargaining with it. Or are you saying the FBI would desire to bargain with Clinton for some reason? I meant the FBI, yes. But i still think it's quite unlikely, but not entirely unprobable.

Jesus christ. RIP.

The wife should consider herself lucky if she doesn't end up being prosecuted.

Maybe for the same reasons that the Russians still haven't released the rest of the deleted emails that they stole: bargaining power.

- Obama treats the US like a Baseball-arena, but he foolishly expects everyone to come to together and like baseball on their own accord. Nobody is really happy, not even the baseball fans, but nobody is really furious either. Nothing is really solved but at least the game is alright. - Hillary treats the US like a game of Civilization and she wants to score the highest score. She has read all the strategy guides and played it several times, but this time she's determined to win. Democracy and the electorate is just a stepping stone for her victory conditions. She is not interested in the Cultural or Science victory, as she hasn't understood them fully, and Domination appeared to be detriment to the current strategy of governance (possible rebellion = minus points). She is placing her bets on the United Nations victory instead. The only ones cheering are the cheerleaders to whom she gave the illusion of having political power or influence over her. Which is nonsense of course, she has a game to win and a high score to beat after all. - Trump treats the US as his garden. He wants it to flourish and he understands that in order to do so, it has to be carefully tendered. There's a lot of weeds that need to be taken out and other flowers that are in dire need to be cultivated once again. A new hedge is needed and he wants it to grow thicker and be better kept than before. There are of procedures expected from him to do so, but they were done by the previous gardeners who were bozos who caused the garden to in the very shape it is now, so why should he even listen to them when he can do it his way? As for financing, he will have a high entrance fee for those who wish to visit it. His taste is a bit tacky though, so expect some cheesy or weird monuments here and there in the new garden. - Bernie treats the US as his classroom and he is the teacher. He wants all the students to succeed and wants to throw the troublemakers out if needed, but at the same time have tries to accomodate students from troubled backgrounds. He is well intended, has some flimsy ideas on how the finances should be kept and resources should be distributed among the students, but all in all, he wants them all to do well one way or the other. His methods aren't liked by the school board and he is in a constant fight with them, but hopes to win them over with his rationale alone. He blames the city council for mismanagement of the schools resources and wants them all thrown out. Since the schoolteacher was replaced i have to concede to the gardener, if i was to decide.

For 160 million you probably get some high-quality animatronics. It would've been more fun as well.

They're not completely unfounded. Check KP's video on the previous page. In other news, the japanese have made their choice already. Trumpu-chan sugoi desu neee

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/06/14/inside-the-hate-filled-mind-of-a-mass-murderer/ How progressive of him.

You may not have been worried. I'm worried about the constant stirring of the hornet's nest that is the Middle East, considering that it contains the most insane nuclear player anywhere in the world. You can sleep well as long as they have the undivided love and attention from Washington DC.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/14/hillary-clinton-received-secret-memo-stating-obama-admin-support-for-isis/ TL;DR-version: An internal memo reveals that the White House actively supported AQI despite being aware of their goals in the region. AQI later became ISIS.

I still remember a time when it was cool to hack the GOP servers. They were going for nudes of Ivanka. EDIT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoGeDGHmwJU Bernie supporters hating the Democratic Party is a dream come true. Why are the procedures so incredibly complicated? End this unnecessary complexity and you will end these strange discrepancies.

I do not think that anyone has been worried about a possibility of a global jihad war in the vein of a total war like World War II, but rather the rise of terrorism. (Besides, i think that the article says something very important when mentioning South East Asia: Namely radical Islam becomes more peaceful once it gets political power, meaning that you have a society like Indonesia or Malaysia where different degrees of Sharia are implemented. I do not think anyone in the western world like a society like them.)

They were talking about this on the Micheal Smerconish show on the radio today. There is a definite link between the Orlando mosque of the Imam that said repeatedly that gays should be killed as a "mercy" that the shooter occasionaly attended and a network with terrorist ties centered in California. The FBI & DHS were investigating that network when the plug was pulled by the State Department (which Hillary Clinton was in charge of) for fear of an investigation that appeared to be "targeting" Muslims in the agents exact words. It is a tenuous link between Hillary Clinton and the Orlando mosque and an even more tenuous one between HC & the shooter. Too tenuous for a real correlation but it does make for interesting reading. I wonder if it might have to do with the possible contacts of Hillary's aid, Huma Mahmood Abedin. Just a hunch.

I still remember a time when it was cool to hack the GOP servers.

Gay or not, he had already placed his priorities long ago: http://nypost.com/2016/06/13/orlando-killer-cheered-911-attacks-former-classmates-say/

*sigh* http://pamelageller.com/2016/06/screaming-allahu-akbar-muslim-murders-police-officer-takes-his-family-hostage-near-paris.html/ I don't know if it is ISIS, but still...

Nevermind that, this: https://archive.is/3TFUY Is he not aware how long Bernie has been in politics...? I have to admit that idiocy in your link is more nuanced.

http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2016/06/13/noor-zahi-salman-second-wife-of-orlando-terrorist/ Interesting. His wife has erased her social media history and he sold his house to his sister for 10$. If one were to ask "did they know?", these circumstances might turn out to be quite incriminating. The source is dubious though (reddit, lol)

You are comparing the modern version of Christian salvation to the extremist version of the lesser Jihad in Islam. ...and there we have it. The solution is not for banning guns or more survaillence. Rather, it's about Islam accepting the gay. They are clearly not inclusive enough and we as society need to focus on the toxic masculinity which is spread in their mosques. Homosexuality is rejected by the Muslim world, they must be the most intolerant religion as far as homosexuality is concerned In the ME many countries have the death penalty for anyone found to be gay If this guy was indeed gay he would have been in this permanent state of confusion and he would have been conflicted. Sadly when certain people refuse to accept who they are as far as sexual orientation is concerned they sometimes resort to violence as a way to somehow deal with the frustration of not being able to be themselves I have seen this before, sometimes the worst bigots end up being gay themselves Keep in mind the message that ISIS puts out: First, it is the duty of the faithful to come to Syria/Iraq and join the fight to re-establish the grandeur of the Caliphate. But, if you can't do that for whatever reason, it'd be great if you could kill as many infidels as you can where you are. This offers a way for unstable folks with violent tendencies to feel justified-- even holy-- in acting out their fantasies of bloodshed. ISIS bears no cost, and gets the benefit of looking scarier to the outside world ("Lone Wolf" attacks are by nature more difficult to prevent than ones involving central coordination), as well as inspiring nativist and anti-Muslim reactions that feed the cycle of recruiting. Thus, "ISIS-inspired" attacks like Orlando (guy who might well have been a self-hating homosexual kills lots of gay folks) and San Bernardino (terrorist attack that just happened to target the perpetrator's co-workers) where religion appears to have been the final justifying factor for violence that already-unhinged perpetrators really wanted to inflict for other reasons. It's the key difference between Islam and Christianity really. In Christianity salvation is inward where no matter what you have done previously, confessing ones sins, regretting them and asking for forgiveness is the path to salvation (Just look at all those gay pastors asking for forgiveness after getting caught). In Islam it is outward, namely you can commit murder in the name of Jihad and the sins are washed away and salvation is given. This is all well and good, but actually there's no lack of Christian congregations spewing hateful rhetoric and downplaying that whole salvation and redemption angle, so I'm understandably sceptical of its inherent superiority. Oh, i am not saying that there aren't hateful groups within Christianity. What i am saying is that you have it easier to find theological justification for murder in order achieve salvation in Islam than in Christianity.

http://archive.is/Y92ii Well, they sure told me.

...and there we have it. The solution is not for banning guns or more survaillence. Rather, it's about Islam accepting the gay. They are clearly not inclusive enough and we as society need to focus on the toxic masculinity which is spread in their mosques. Homosexuality is rejected by the Muslim world, they must be the most intolerant religion as far as homosexuality is concerned In the ME many countries have the death penalty for anyone found to be gay If this guy was indeed gay he would have been in this permanent state of confusion and he would have been conflicted. Sadly when certain people refuse to accept who they are as far as sexual orientation is concerned they sometimes resort to violence as a way to somehow deal with the frustration of not being able to be themselves I have seen this before, sometimes the worst bigots end up being gay themselves Keep in mind the message that ISIS puts out: First, it is the duty of the faithful to come to Syria/Iraq and join the fight to re-establish the grandeur of the Caliphate. But, if you can't do that for whatever reason, it'd be great if you could kill as many infidels as you can where you are. This offers a way for unstable folks with violent tendencies to feel justified-- even holy-- in acting out their fantasies of bloodshed. ISIS bears no cost, and gets the benefit of looking scarier to the outside world ("Lone Wolf" attacks are by nature more difficult to prevent than ones involving central coordination), as well as inspiring nativist and anti-Muslim reactions that feed the cycle of recruiting. Thus, "ISIS-inspired" attacks like Orlando (guy who might well have been a self-hating homosexual kills lots of gay folks) and San Bernardino (terrorist attack that just happened to target the perpetrator's co-workers) where religion appears to have been the final justifying factor for violence that already-unhinged perpetrators really wanted to inflict for other reasons. It's the key difference between Islam and Christianity really. In Christianity salvation is inward where no matter what you have done previously, confessing ones sins, regretting them and asking for forgiveness is the path to salvation (Just look at all those gay pastors asking for forgiveness after getting caught). In Islam it is outward, namely you can commit murder in the name of Jihad and the sins are washed away and salvation is given.