Meshugger

Remember folks, all people are equal, but some are more equal than others: FBI edition. Kidding aside, when you have the head of the FBI saying that this kind of behaviour is unacceptable for security and administrative personel and should be penalized but then doing a 180 and not recommending indictment shows that there's some serious politickin' going on behind the curtain.

I've met people with ridiculously high IQ. They seemed to be more obsessed with weird stuff, like using formal logic notation to prove the most efficient code written or dwelve into esotericism or metaphysics. Point being, they seem to be on their own plane of consciousness and not care about wordly stuff that much.

Come to think of it, the only popular litterature on the subject is the Bell Curve, but i haven't ever gotten myself to read it though and i quite certain that it has gotten quite the critique. On the other hand, claiming that different ethnic groups developed in different conditions in different parts of the world for millennia would have no effect whatsoever in their group mentality or behaviour and that political theories is the only solution is also preposterous. I am however unsure where the nature ends and nurture begins (see for example Thomas Sowell's research on early 20th century development among black, jews and other minorities. Different factors and potentials for each group and all that).

Bull****, you made at least one member (me) more open to gun rights and freedom of speech. I don't know if it helps, but it is something rather than nothing.

Indeed, source would definately be good to have as 75 as mean IQ is borderline for the medical term imbecille.

Who's the bigger nitwit, Trump Bruce or (we) the people who keep engaging with and/or insulting him? The people who engage him. It's clear by now he's either a troll or an idiot, either way it's a waste of time. Anyways someone on Trump's staff browses /pol/ It took me a while to understand the connection with the star, very subtle indeed. Who's the bigger nitwit, Trump Bruce or (we) the people who keep engaging with and/or insulting him? The people who engage him. It's clear by now he's either a troll or an idiot, either way it's a waste of time. Anyways someone on Trump's staff browses /pol/ Hey if you guys want me to screw off, I can take the hint. Don't ever let your conscience for posting be in the hands of approval of others, just keep on truckin'.

Who's the bigger nitwit, Trump Bruce or (we) the people who keep engaging with and/or insulting him? I like you In other news, Trump is now a villain in comics as well: http://archive.is/ClLg6

But ironically my views based on " sounds like a something a girl would make on the school playground with the same arrogance that comes with it, as boys don't hit girls " happen to be correct in this case ...strange that I also reject this notion öf " arguing like a man " , thats 1980's and sexist. Nowadays we just debate like people in a debate, there is no " mans way to debate " But ironically my views based on " sounds like a something a girl would make on the school playground with the same arrogance that comes with it, as boys don't hit girls " happen to be correct in this case ...strange that I also reject this notion öf " arguing like a man " , thats 1980's and sexist. Nowadays we just debate like people in a debate, there is no " mans way to debate " Case in point. You have absolutely no idea what i am talking about and just throw killing words to end the discussion, while thriving over the attention given from everyone talking about you.

LF: No need to get upset about Bruce's antics. He has confessed of being brought up in matriarchal household with little to no father figures or heroes, which also explains why his arguments sounds like a something a girl would make on the school playground with the same arrogance that comes with it, as boys don't hit girls. A normal man knows that that kind of attitude would get him beat up or even put behind the sauna as we say in Finland, but he simply doesn't understand for the reasons i just stated. If you drop all assumptions of him arguing like a man among men, but as a little Daisy trying asserting her dominance as queen hen of her pack and you can have a chuckle and move on. As for the Hillary case, i am still waiting for the scapegoat(s) to appear or to be found.

I'd bet on the former. No e-cookie for betting that. The other one is based on the rumour floating around that all this about emails are a smokescreen for the Clinton Foundation, which will be indicted according the the RICO law. That would monumental, if one were to look from whom the Foundation gets its money from.

The developments the last 24 hours makes me wonder if some scapegoats will be discovered or that the head of the FBI will resign.

Hercules thinks that Jesus would vote for Trump http://imgur.com/gallery/HYYF0X2

Oh boy, that will sure take a while to get through and to connect some new dots.

There it is, thanks! I have to see it for myself some day.

I have a hypothesis that a liberal in its most perverse form is masochism (hatred to ones own kin, hatred of ones gender, norms, cuckholding, etc) and a rightwinger in his most perverse from is sadism (do i really need to explain the type violence perpetuated in WWII?). Some important scientific discoveries can be done in this area! As for Molyneux, even if i agree with him, his jokes come off at the autistic spectrum too much. Perhaps he suffered some emotional distress at a younger age leaving him only with pure reason to console to and here we are with people falling over themselves trying find ways to discredit him, which is hilarious in itself. On the other hand, i have never met someone claiming to be a philosopher who hasn't come off as a bit loopy. Just look at Zizek for other modern ones. His debate with Horowitz was hilarious. Where am I? Aaaah yes, morning coffee. I need it now.

The World: Here's what we think about your leaders and what policies you should enforce.... The US: Blow it out your ass *puts on sunglasses*

President Hollande thinks that Trump presidency would be dangerous: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-3666661/Frances-Hollande-says-Trump-election-dangerous.html Nigel Farage thinks that a Hillary presidency should not be happening: Just a small insight on what goes on in the corridors of the political power.

^Excellent polling data there. Once they get rid of old, white and christian people, Britain will never have to worry about another Brexit again.

Is that the Old Faithful?

What are you talking about? The heavenly blessing of suicidial sacrifice for The Great Lord Athe with his eternal tipping of the Fedora can make even the most meek one enlightened into a fanatical frenzy. This is no joking matter.

Definitely looks like ISIS though they usually claim responsibility fairly quickly. But Kurdish groups (especially TAK) have used suicide bombings before despite being secular/ atheist in philosophy. 41 dead now and still no official word from any group. Quite odd indeed.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36658187 36 dead, 147 injured. I somehow doubt that this attack was conducted by the kurdish nationalists.

I may not always agree with Taibbi, but boy is it fun to read his articles. Full of fire all the time.

How intolerant of the EU parliament to not accept different debate cultures, such as the british. That was so much tamer compared to day-to-day debates at Westminster, and most certainly compared to Thatcher vs. the opposition in the 80's. I am disappointed Wishing for death upon someone because he has a bad attitude? You gotta have one hell of a kill list stacked under your bed.